![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Virgin are the current candidates. Outqualified by both HRTs...
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
GwilymJJames wrote:I'm voting for Maldonado. I don't have a good reason yet, but I'm sure I'll get one.
Peter wrote:I think Pastor is saving his tyres. If everyone else prepares for a wet race tomorrow, but it turns out to be dry, he'll be a step ahead of the rest, as he was saving tyres, while the rest of the grid seemed to use their tyres quite a bit more than normal in qualifying today. If it rains, though, his idea is ROTR worthy though.
Code: Select all
14:03 RaikkonenPlsCare There's some water in water
Shizuka wrote:Peter wrote:I think Pastor is saving his tyres. If everyone else prepares for a wet race tomorrow, but it turns out to be dry, he'll be a step ahead of the rest, as he was saving tyres, while the rest of the grid seemed to use their tyres quite a bit more than normal in qualifying today. If it rains, though, his idea is ROTR worthy though.
Yes, that is definitely a hit or miss strategy. However, in order to make good use of it, he will need not only a good pitstop strategy, but also a fast car as well to at least have a shot of scoring a point.
If it will actually rain, there will be his tyres sitting in his side of the garage for nothing and that alone will be a ROTR nomination
James1978 wrote:For qualifying , I nominate all the weather forecasters who said it was going to rain any moment.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
GwilymJJames wrote:I'm voting for Maldonado. I don't have a good reason yet, but I'm sure I'll get one.
Code: Select all
14:03 RaikkonenPlsCare There's some water in water
kevinbotz wrote:Cantonese is a completely nonsensical f*cking alien language masquerading as some grossly bastardised form of Chinese
Gonzo wrote:Wasn't there some sort of communisim in the East part of Germany?
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
JeremyMcClean wrote:The stewards for penalizing Senna for no good reason at all - it was purely a racing incident. Oh, and Virgin's pit crew deserves a mention as well.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
kostas22 wrote:Marussia Virgin Racing
Every aspect of their weekend has been dire. Even by backmarker standards they were bad.
jpm wrote:kostas22 wrote:Marussia Virgin Racing
Every aspect of their weekend has been dire. Even by backmarker standards they were bad.
Hey, at least d'Ambrosio outraced Ricciardo and was ahead of Liuzzi before he retired! I'll go with the stewards for penalizing Senna (that was Massa-India style harsh), the weatherman, and Brundle who claimed that this was Lewis' first retirement since Singapore last year; actually it was Belgium when he CRASHED into Kobayashi. The time before that was Canada when he CRASHED into Button. Then you have Singapore. I'm sorry, but I for one won't be unhappy to see Brundle bugger off to a bigger pay-package at Sky next year. With Charlie Cox and Watty in the booth, we'd have no more "Vettel with 1 'l' there David" or "he's going faster...and...he says 14th". GOOD RIDDANCE¬
Back on topic, it was nice to see a return of unreliability too shake things up for a change. Why are people nominating gearboxes?
Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing, I wouldn't be in Formula 1