Tell me how many races did you watch last season in GP3? Tell me how Quaife-Hobbs, despite having 1 season of experience which is a huge advantage to debutants, never managed to deliver in 2011?
giraurd wrote:Tell me how many races did you watch last season in GP3? Tell me how Quaife-Hobbs, despite having 1 season of experience which is a huge advantage to debutants, never managed to deliver in 2011?
His GP3 season was dissapointing, but Potty had far more high level motorsport experience in general. And how do you explain his AutoGP domination. When AQH is ready for f1 in a couple of years he will be extremely fast
aerond wrote:Yes RDD, but we always knew you never had any sort of taste either
tommykl wrote:I have a shite car and meme sponsors, but Corrado Fabi will carry me to the promised land with the power of Lionel Richie.
You didn't answer my other question either. So let's rephrase -- how many motorsport races in total have you seen from Quaife-Hobbs to base your judgement on?
---
Yes, Bottas might be overrated (don't follow english broadcasts so I'm not sure about the level of its annoyance) but I'm a little bit annoyed too with seeing you straight bashing him 45 times a month here with no basis behind your analysis.
giraurd wrote: Yes, Bottas might be overrated (don't follow english broadcasts so I'm not sure about the level of its annoyance) but I'm a little bit annoyed too with seeing you straight bashing him 45 times a month here with no basis behind your analysis.
With his experience he should have been completely dominant, and he was absolutely nowhere in the first half of the season.
And besides, I really like Quaife-Hobbs. And he was born on the 3rd of February
aerond wrote:Yes RDD, but we always knew you never had any sort of taste either
tommykl wrote:I have a shite car and meme sponsors, but Corrado Fabi will carry me to the promised land with the power of Lionel Richie.
Bottas had had two seasons in GP3/F3 level cars before 2011, of which both in F3...Quaife-Hobbs had had one which was in GP3 cars. So there's no 'huge' experience advantage you talk of.
Furthermore, the team (yes, the whole ART team) did suffer from setuping problems (lack of top speed) throughout the first half of the season, then before the German races Bottas stated they had come around them and since that ART, and esp Bottas was rather dominant.
But obviously you wouldn't know if you didn't follow...
---
Point is, it's not my problem what's your opinion about a driver or how much you hate Bottas, but the one sided bashing*500 messages on a forum without a thought of facts is simply childish behaviour imo.
giraurd wrote: Point is, it's not my problem what's your opinion about a driver or how much you hate Bottas, but the one sided bashing*500 messages on a forum without a thought of facts is simply childish behaviour imo.
I hate him because he is overrated, some people are saying that he can be a future champion
aerond wrote:Yes RDD, but we always knew you never had any sort of taste either
tommykl wrote:I have a shite car and meme sponsors, but Corrado Fabi will carry me to the promised land with the power of Lionel Richie.
giraurd wrote: Point is, it's not my problem what's your opinion about a driver or how much you hate Bottas, but the one sided bashing*500 messages on a forum without a thought of facts is simply childish behaviour imo.
I hate him because he is overrated, some people are saying that he can be a future champion
You kids hate too much these days. Peace and love, man!
Colin Kolles on F111, 2011 HRT challenger: The car doesn't look too bad; it looks like a modern F1 car.
giraurd wrote: Point is, it's not my problem what's your opinion about a driver or how much you hate Bottas, but the one sided bashing*500 messages on a forum without a thought of facts is simply childish behaviour imo.
I hate him because he is overrated, some people are saying that he can be a future champion
I think he'll fit the Heikki Kovalainen-Mika Salo-JJ Lehto bracket pretty well: a regular points scorer who might luck out a podium once in a while, but no championship material.
But, eurobrun has been defending his views pretty aggressively in the past few days. Has the puberty finally settled in or what?
Eurosport broadcast for the 1990 Mexican GP prequalifying: "The Life, it looked very lifeless yet again... in fact Bruno did one, slow lap"
giraurd wrote: Point is, it's not my problem what's your opinion about a driver or how much you hate Bottas, but the one sided bashing*500 messages on a forum without a thought of facts is simply childish behaviour imo.
I hate him because he is overrated, some people are saying that he can be a future champion
I think he'll fit the Heikki Kovalainen-Mika Salo-JJ Lehto bracket pretty well: a regular points scorer who might luck out a podium once in a while, but no championship material.
But, eurobrun has been defending his views pretty aggressively in the past few days. Has the puberty finally settled in or what?
Maybe his special lady friend is having a much bigger effect than we thought
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
eurobrun wrote: I hate him because he is overrated, some people are saying that he can be a future champion
I think he'll fit the Heikki Kovalainen-Mika Salo-JJ Lehto bracket pretty well: a regular points scorer who might luck out a podium once in a while, but no championship material.
But, eurobrun has been defending his views pretty aggressively in the past few days. Has the puberty finally settled in or what?
Maybe his special lady friend is having a much bigger effect than we thought
Hmmm, I have noticed that I have been angrier recently. Don't really know why
aerond wrote:Yes RDD, but we always knew you never had any sort of taste either
tommykl wrote:I have a shite car and meme sponsors, but Corrado Fabi will carry me to the promised land with the power of Lionel Richie.
Nuppiz wrote:I think he'll fit the Heikki Kovalainen-Mika Salo-JJ Lehto bracket pretty well: a regular points scorer who might luck out a podium once in a while, but no championship material.
But, eurobrun has been defending his views pretty aggressively in the past few days. Has the puberty finally settled in or what?
Maybe his special lady friend is having a much bigger effect than we thought
Hmmm, I have noticed that I have been angrier recently. Don't really know why
For the love of HWNSNBM dude, just ask her out already and use it as a positive emotional release. Emphasis on the word positive.
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
eurobrun wrote: Hmmm, I have noticed that I have been angrier recently. Don't really know why
For the love of HWNSNBM dude, just ask her out already and use it as a positive emotional release. Emphasis on the word positive.
I was sort of half planning to sometime during school holidays, It is now school holidays over here
Strike when the iron is hot. And remember what I told you, passoa and lemonade...
Mitch Hedberg wrote:I want to be a race car passenger: just a guy who bugs the driver. Say man, can I turn on the radio? You should slow down. Why do we gotta keep going in circles? Man, you really like Tide...
I would suggest impressing her, with your F1 reject knowledge. How could she not fall for that?
Back on topic, I think the Austin GP will fail.
Still unsure about how New Jersey will turn out. The track & New York skyline thing seem OK, but if F1 didn't work at Indy, I'm left wondering what chance has it got, anywhere else in the states?
Coming January 2019 a new F1 book revisiting 1994.
The drivers profiled here certainly(from what we deduce) haven't feared rejection. it's what it's all about man just go for it and be a hero or something i guess
I believe in German BARawnda-Tyrrell-Simca(and it's working)
the only difference between the roman gladiators and racing drivers is that racing drivers sit inside the lion that is trying to kill them.
nome66 wrote:The drivers profiled here certainly(from what we deduce) haven't feared rejection. it's what it's all about man just go for it and be a hero or something i guess
And in the end they all got rejected, so that analogy doesn't help much.
I hope Grosjean wins the championship next season. With Bottas second.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l
Coming off of DC's article in The Telegraph, I can't help but say one thing: Stirling Moss and Gilles Villeneuve are overrated. Hamilton is much better than them.
And something that pertains to the likes of Gilles Villeneuve, Stefan Bellof, Ayrton Senna etc.: Why are those that died "in action", aka on the track, valued higher than those that didn't?
Sticking his neck on the line, one post at a time. Oh, and Singapore is still better than Monaco.
Coming off of DC's article in The Telegraph, I can't help but say one thing: Stirling Moss and Gilles Villeneuve are overrated. Hamilton is much better than them.
And something that pertains to the likes of Gilles Villeneuve, Stefan Bellof, Ayrton Senna etc.: Why are those that died "in action", aka on the track, valued higher than those that didn't?
Coming off of DC's article in The Telegraph, I can't help but say one thing: Stirling Moss and Gilles Villeneuve are overrated. Hamilton is much better than them.
And something that pertains to the likes of Gilles Villeneuve, Stefan Bellof, Ayrton Senna etc.: Why are those that died "in action", aka on the track, valued higher than those that didn't?
I have to laugh at the Di Rasta love in DC's article
aerond wrote:Yes RDD, but we always knew you never had any sort of taste either
tommykl wrote:I have a shite car and meme sponsors, but Corrado Fabi will carry me to the promised land with the power of Lionel Richie.
Pamphlet wrote:Coming off of DC's article in The Telegraph, I can't help but say one thing: Stirling Moss and Gilles Villeneuve are overrated. Hamilton is much better than them.
I disagree, Stirling Moss was easily the best driver never to win a title - don't forget, his career was cut short by injury. With all credit to Mike Hawthorn, I do think Moss would've won the title in 1958 if his Vanwall was anything approaching reliable, not to mention the fact that he was the only driver who ever looked like he had anything for Fangio after 1954. As for Gilles Villeneuve, well, come back when Hamilton won a race in a car that had no right to.
Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing, I wouldn't be in Formula 1
As much as I respect the man, I think that Michael Schumacher's a bit over rated. Admittedly, his 94 and 95 titles were impressive, won in cars that were theoretically inferior to the Williams. Again, his 2000 title was impressive, as I feel the McLaren was probably faster, and he had to work hard for his 2003 title. But in 01, 02 and 04, he had clearly the best car and the only person who had the same car wasn't allowed to beat him. In fact, his closest non-Ferrari challengers in those years were DC, Ralf Schumi and Button. Out of those three, I only rate one of those as a truly good driver.
takagi_for_the_win wrote:As much as I respect the man, I think that Michael Schumacher's a bit over rated. Admittedly, his 94 and 95 titles were impressive, won in cars that were theoretically inferior to the Williams. Again, his 2000 title was impressive, as I feel the McLaren was probably faster, and he had to work hard for his 2003 title. But in 01, 02 and 04, he had clearly the best car and the only person who had the same car wasn't allowed to beat him. In fact, his closest non-Ferrari challengers in those years were DC, Ralf Schumi and Button. Out of those three, I only rate one of those as a truly good driver.
Actually, 2001 was arguably as impressive as 2000 or 1995 as on any given weekend, Williams and McLaren were able to challenge Ferrari on pure pace alone. It's just that neither team was able to convert that to actual race results anywhere near as often as Ferrari managed to.
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
takagi_for_the_win wrote:As much as I respect the man, I think that Michael Schumacher's a bit over rated. Admittedly, his 94 and 95 titles were impressive, won in cars that were theoretically inferior to the Williams. Again, his 2000 title was impressive, as I feel the McLaren was probably faster, and he had to work hard for his 2003 title. But in 01, 02 and 04, he had clearly the best car and the only person who had the same car wasn't allowed to beat him. In fact, his closest non-Ferrari challengers in those years were DC, Ralf Schumi and Button. Out of those three, I only rate one of those as a truly good driver.
Actually, 2001 was arguably as impressive as 2000 or 1995 as on any given weekend, Williams and McLaren were able to challenge Ferrari on pure pace alone. It's just that neither team was able to convert that to actual race results anywhere near as often as Ferrari managed to.
2001 was mostly down to reliability and drivers that were just not good enough. Hakkinen had a horrible start and that took a lot out of him I think, while Coulthard was never going to beat Michael Schumacher unless he had a massive car advantage. Whereas Montoya spent most of 2001 either broken down or crashing into things, and Ralf Schumacher was in the same situation as Coulthard.
Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing, I wouldn't be in Formula 1