Cynon wrote:Wallio wrote:http://espn.go.com/racing/indycar/story/_/id/8525429/indycar-founder-tony-george-resigns-hulman-co-board
REJOICE! Looks like George did make his offer, and it wasn't considered serious. Also The IICS board has shot down the Indy Star report that Randy is fired, although they strangely said "Randy Bernard has not been fired this week". Some vote of confidence.
Randy's fate is uncertain, but I won't believe that he is fired unless Indycar makes an official release and tells him to get out. Bernard has the most thankless job in motorsports. Easily.
Nah, it could be worse. For once, Randy isn't in danger to get jailed for bribery in Germany.
On the hand, I really think IndyCar should be taken from the IMS. I mean, what's the purpose of IndyCar? To provide a full grid for the 500, but that's something another series could provide. Sure, some teams are getting subsidies from the speedway, but if they can't afford IndyCar, they should bugger off and do another series instead. Someone else (with more knowledge about running a business) will probably take over.
Ironically, as much as I want the speedway to restrict its influence of IndyCar racing, the Indy 500 should still lay the groundwork for the revitalization of IndyCar racing. Unfortunately, USAC doesn't sanction Indy anymore, or else they would have opened up the regs a bit. The sad thing is, it just needs relatively few changes, to get the ball rolling. Just allow different chassis manufacturers to enter, and allow different engine choices (Why not a 3.8l-V8 N/A (Based off a turbo factor of 1.7) engine as a supplement to the V6 turbos). Unfortunately, reason seems to be a foreign word in Indiana...