UgncreativeUsergname wrote:go_Rubens wrote:Well, the voting is over. As much of a gentleman move that is on your part watka, I'm not sure whether doing that would be allowed. Although, someone besides a competition winner did decide a challenge as the one who won that time didn't show up for a while to decide, but that's it. Since I'm one who tends to post tracks and results during a competition, but doesn't have a grasp or authority on deciding anything in such situations, I think I'll let UgncreativeUsergname decide the fate, as he ran this for a long time before I came along. My personal opinion is that we should stick with what actually happened, but if it was a misunderstanding (and it appears it was), and Stramala would them get a vote from you watka now that the misunderstanding is resolved, which would propel him into winning status, I believe the next theme should be drawn up by Stramala as a solution, as this thread should not be run too strictly. It's all for fun, right?
The scores have been announced, so the vote's closed, so watka is still the winner of the competition. It's not like Jimmy46 where he disappeared, he just can't think of anything, so he gets to keep the win.
So here's the new rule, since apparently I can autocratically make them when needed: if the winner can't think of anything, the runner-up can make a challenge if they want. So if Stramala wants to make a track brief, he can, as he's the next one in line. If he doesn't feel like it, then tommykl gets the privilege next. Here's the full list for this round:
1. watka
2. Stramala
3. tommykl
4. peteroli34
5 (at this point we decide by fewest reject points; this is not a new tiebreaker for the regular results). go_Rubens
6. dr-baker
7. roblomas52
Of course, it's unlikely it'll ever get down very far in a competition, but it's better to be safe.
I know I'm 6th on the list and therefore unlikely that I'll decide, but I do have 2 or 3 ideas if people want...