CoopsII wrote:SgtPepper wrote:Considering I was one of those in the crowds at Silverstone cheering when his car stopped, I consider myself 'that sort of person,' but whatever. I'm not actually offended, more just trying to show that you can't deleniate, generalise or dismiss a section of the fanbase quite so readily purely because they may differ with either your opinion, or way of expressing it.
Im fine with the cheering as I was when the Germans cheered Hill tanking out at Hockenheim in '96. As you've linked the booing and cheering, not me, may I ask if you approved of Vettel being boo'd?
Yes I did, and it's for a similar reason I wrote that long article on Coulthard, and why my respect of Crofty and Kravitz has increased exponentially in recent years. We all know the F1 world is a small one, and quite a lot of the time I really like that - we see familar faces knocking about the paddock, former drivers commentating or being involved in teams, it gives a great sense of continuity and we can familiarise ourselves with differing personalities (which makes it all the more interesting when there is conflict, as the contrast gives greater depth). The problem is that it also has an occasional tendency to close ranks, and narrow its own gaze. Alongside this drivers, teams or commentators having a vested interest in masking their opinions because treading on toes is both rude and going to get you nowhere - if you criticise a driver or team, why would they want to invite you back for another interview? This is one of the issues that really became apparent through the Vettel domination years, the paddock generaly held ranks perpetually insisting we accept Vettel's greatness (apart from the odd comment by Hamilton or Alonso, and the 2012 driver of the year vote), whereas the fanbase was very clearly split down the middle.
Now when it came to the booing, the F1 world was finally forced to realise, and more importantly
acknowledge that perhaps something was awry within the fanbase - commentators were grasping at a variety of explanations to try explain it - whether it was the events in Malaysia, weariness of one team's dominance, or simply the doubt concerning Vettel's 'greatness' overall, these were finally forced out into the open whereas before we cannot know if the F1 world was too cosseted to be aware of them, or too driven by vested interests to voice them. Admittedly there was a concerted PR effort by Red Bull to try give Vettel a more likeable face which did manage to alleviate and diffuse much of the tension eventually, but the point is that the issues that had been bubbling under the surface was brought to light, despite the best efforts of those involved on the contrary.
Edit - For the record I found the booing of Hill in Germany disgusting, because as far as I can tell Hill was always the consumate sportsman, and the cheering of Schumacher crashing in '99 disgusting as well, as there was a serious chance Schumacher could have been very badly injured or worse (I mean in regards to how much the fans would have known at the time of the incident.)
F1 claim to fame - Offending Karun Chandhok 38 minutes into the Korean Grand Prix's FP1.
PSN: SgtPepperThe1st