Headline of the year?

shinji · Post by **shinji** » 12 Feb 2010, 21:34

The Virgin's really having some difficulties getting up and running.

thehemogoblin · Post by **thehemogoblin** » 12 Feb 2010, 21:52

Phoenix wrote:That Virgin is really a beauty, especially with Glock on it.

The Glock likes the Virgin, and the Virgin likes the Glock.

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 12 Feb 2010, 21:54

thehemogoblin wrote:
Phoenix wrote:That Virgin is really a beauty, especially with Glock on it.

The Glock likes the Virgin, and the Virgin likes the Glock.

Except when the Virgin has issues. Then he switches to another Virgin.

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 13 Feb 2010, 04:38

Like a Virgin....Touched for the very first time

Or...

That Virgin is easy, it only needs one drink (petrol) to get her going.

or

That Virgin looks tight, but I reckon you can fit two inside it??? Might need some lubication though.

or

The Glock is working hard pounding away inside the Virgin

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 13 Feb 2010, 05:30

Virgin LOVES Glock.

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 13 Feb 2010, 09:12

virgin broken into by angry Glock

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 13 Feb 2010, 09:20

I'm getting far too carried away with this now, I'm starting to worry myself....but here's anotherone...

Glock slides himself into Virgin's tight little cockpit...(&has the time of his life).

CarlosFerreira · Post by **CarlosFerreira** » 13 Feb 2010, 09:51

Glock is refraining from making comparisons between the Virgin and others in his past. Gentlemanly of him.

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 13 Feb 2010, 11:15

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/81457

Sounds like the Virgin is getting frustrated its not getting enough.

Drivers all I can say is form an orderly queue.

CarlosFerreira · Post by **CarlosFerreira** » 13 Feb 2010, 16:30

ibsey wrote:http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/81457

Sounds like the Virgin is getting frustrated its not getting enough.

Drivers all I can say is form an orderly queue.

Do you reckon the Autosport reporter sniggered as he uploaded that?

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 13 Feb 2010, 16:54

CarlosFerreira wrote:
ibsey wrote:http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/81457

Sounds like the Virgin is getting frustrated its not getting enough.

Drivers all I can say is form an orderly queue.

Do you reckon the Autosport reporter sniggered as he uploaded that?

My humble opinion, I'm not sure any magazines / newspapers reporters have realised yet, how much fun they can have with this??? I certainly didn't notice anything unusual about Virgin GP's name until reading this thread. After having read it, it has warped my fragile little mind...so now every time I do read / hear about Virgin...I won't be able to help myself.

Maybe we should send some of these ideas to The Sun or other tabloids just to get things started?

p.s. I can't wait until the first time a driver "creams" into the back of the Virgin.

Post by **DemocalypseNow** » 13 Feb 2010, 23:37

Oh man...if Glock or di Grassi get into a Tomas Schekter-esqe scandal we will never hear the end of it from the tabloids.

Jordan · Post by **Jordan** » 14 Feb 2010, 00:35

Today I saw

"DiGrassi pleased with Virgin's pace"

LionZoo · Post by **LionZoo** » 14 Feb 2010, 04:31

How about...

Virgin frustrated by lack of action?

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 14 Feb 2010, 09:15

LionZoo wrote:How about...

Virgin frustrated by lack of action?

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/81493

Sounds like, The Virgin & Di Grassi are relieved to be finally getting down to some action, (on Valentine's Day as well).

Or how about this,

Di Grassi feels relieved by Virgin's willingness

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 14 Feb 2010, 09:22

Team strips the Virgin in preparation for some Glock.

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 14 Feb 2010, 11:29

Ouch! That Virgin is completely bent over.

Collieafc · Post by **Collieafc** » 14 Feb 2010, 23:45

Glock fires up Virgin

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 15 Feb 2010, 15:06

That Virgin is able to reach 60 mph in less than 3 seconds.

LionZoo · Post by **LionZoo** » 15 Feb 2010, 19:05

Considering recent testing times: Virgin is surprisingly fast.

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 15 Feb 2010, 19:37

Virgin struggles to fit Glock's refueling hose inside it.

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 16 Feb 2010, 23:18

Ohhhhhhh...Myyyyyy (Murray Walker style)........The two virgin's come together

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 17 Feb 2010, 13:53

The Virgins did an embarrasing performance today.

watka · Post by **watka** » 17 Feb 2010, 17:17

ibsey wrote:Ohhhhhhh...Myyyyyy (Murray Walker style)........The two virgin's come together

"I have never seen that before!"

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 17 Feb 2010, 17:35

Shock! Horror! F1 driver is willing to pay big bucks to get inside the Virgin.

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 17 Feb 2010, 17:39

Glock says Virgin "has a nice front end & rides well. But its a shame it is a bit unstable after the humps" (reminds me of an ex girlfriend) :lol:

CarlosFerreira · Post by **CarlosFerreira** » 17 Feb 2010, 17:46

Now ibsey, let's stop mocking the Virgin. It's been hard on them, this string of testing sessions.

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 17 Feb 2010, 19:56

CarlosFerreira wrote:Now ibsey, let's stop mocking the Virgin. It's been hard on them, this string of testing sessions.

Yeah, he/she has to be extenuated.

dr-baker · Post by **dr-baker** » 17 Feb 2010, 20:12

The Virgin won't always want to be coming last, with everybody coming on top... :oops:

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 17 Feb 2010, 20:30

CarlosFerreira wrote:Now ibsey, let's stop mocking the Virgin. It's been hard on them, this string of testing sessions.

Yes it seems from testing the Virgin is struggling to last as long as Glock or di Grass would like it to.

Ah come on Carlos do I really have to stop? If anything I would have thought I am doing Virgin a favour by giving them free advertising, therefore indirectly helping the team become successful.

In fact I think I should be paid for my efforts by Richard Branson.

There are just so many possibilities to be had, and I haven't even got started jokes about fuel injection, sliding skirts, bottoming out, leaking fluid.

CarlosFerreira · Post by **CarlosFerreira** » 17 Feb 2010, 21:06

ibsey wrote:Ah come on Carlos do I really have to stop? If anything I would have thought I am doing Virgin a favour by giving them free advertising, therefore indirectly helping the team become successful.

If you re-read it, I'm only in the spirit of things.

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 17 Feb 2010, 21:40

dr-baker wrote:The Virgin won't always want to be coming last, with everybody coming on top...

That is assuming it actually manages to come anywhere at all!

shinji · Post by **shinji** » 17 Feb 2010, 21:43

That is a dilemma - what will they be called after the first race, when they are no longer F1 virgins?

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 17 Feb 2010, 21:47

CarlosFerreira wrote:
ibsey wrote:Ah come on Carlos do I really have to stop? If anything I would have thought I am doing Virgin a favour by giving them free advertising, therefore indirectly helping the team become successful.

If you re-read it, I'm only in the spirit of things.

Oh now I get it... you sly dog Carlos. Clever work. You had me fooled as I thought I was going to end up getting myself banned.

Post by **DemocalypseNow** » 17 Feb 2010, 22:27

shinji wrote:That is a dilemma - what will they be called after the first race, when they are no longer F1 virgins?

If by some miracle they start finishing 10th all the time this season, they'll have to be renamed Points Wh*re Racing.

CarlosFerreira · Post by **CarlosFerreira** » 17 Feb 2010, 22:37

ibsey wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:
ibsey wrote:Ah come on Carlos do I really have to stop? If anything I would have thought I am doing Virgin a favour by giving them free advertising, therefore indirectly helping the team become successful.

If you re-read it, I'm only in the spirit of things.

Oh now I get it... you sly dog Carlos. Clever work. You had me fooled as I thought I was going to end up getting myself banned.

I can't ban anyone, and I don't think the forum does ban. I'm having a few chuckles with this thread.

shinji · Post by **shinji** » 17 Feb 2010, 22:41

CarlosFerreira wrote:
I can't ban anyone, and I don't think the forum does ban. I'm having a few chuckles with this thread.

I think that the snoozey episode taught us that this forum does not ban even the largest douchebags.

ibsey · Post by **ibsey** » 17 Feb 2010, 23:30

shinji wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:
I can't ban anyone, and I don't think the forum does ban. I'm having a few chuckles with this thread.

I think that the snoozey episode taught us that this forum does not ban even the largest douchebags.

I must admit, I was half expecting to get banned from posting my previous comment here (Virgin loses her red wings).

If you don't fully understand that one, then all I can say is you haven't yet lived.

shinji · Post by **shinji** » 17 Feb 2010, 23:36

I understand it. Just not from any kind of experience. :oops:

thehemogoblin · Post by **thehemogoblin** » 18 Feb 2010, 01:18

shinji wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:
I can't ban anyone, and I don't think the forum does ban. I'm having a few chuckles with this thread.

I think that the snoozey episode taught us that this forum does not ban even the largest douchebags.

However, it did reaffirm the fact that I'M IN CHARGE DAMMIT YOU DO WHAT I SAY.