CarlosFerreira wrote:Couple of comments on Qualy:
- HRT is up (well, down) there with Virgin. Lotus seems to have the upper hand of both. Anyone in for a bet that, once they figure out which way the nuts and bolts go, the Dallara chassis will turn out to be better than the other two (despite my previous comments on Colin Kolles' sanguine comments)?
- Old habits die hard. You still don't want to sit in Renault's number 2 car.
- Rosberg held Schumi away, just. The comeback starts here.
- The Saubers are [insert your derogatory adjective of choice here]. Cowboy-ashi is overdriving, and the platform doesn't seem to like being overdriven.
- No running on Friday morning, and again 10th on the grid: Sutil, what a man! I wonder who he'll crash into in corner 1 tomorrow.
- Hulkenberg clearly trying to keep his drawers clean this time around. Come on son, we now you have it, just give it the beans.
- Buemi is in the middle of the grid. Bet nobody noticed, not even within Toro Rosso.
- And what is Lewis Hamilton doing?
Interesting points made here. I think that although the Dallara chassis has the potential to be one of the better, if not the best, of the new cars, simply down to the extra experience Dallara has in making open wheeled cars, it depends on how quickly they can develop the car, and how fast HRT can get up to speed. HRT are going to need time to learn, and are more likely to be the weak link - the mechanics are almost exclusively new to the sport, as are most of the management, so it'll be a long and steep learning curve for them. That, in turn, could hinder the efforts of Dallara in developing the car - if the team are still learning about the car, then how could Dallara evaluate any new parts, based on feedback from the team?
As for Petrov, well, he made my prediction that he could have an ok weekend look foolish, although the car did look pretty tough to drive. Brundle was theorising that since Petrov has no experience of this track, he might have been relying on Kubica's set up - so, a sub optimal set up and inexperience seem to have lead to quite a big drop in confidence (although congratulations to Kubica for getting into the top 10).
Sauber have been a let down again - 14th and 16th - and Kobayashi is clearly not happy with the car. He has to calm down a bit behind the wheel, because I think that he is suffering a bit from 'eager driver' syndrome (a tendency to try to drive to the ragged edge every lap in the hope of attracting the big teams, when he should calm down a bit and focus on the season as a whole, instead of each race at a time). It also looks like Sauber's attempt at an F duct has been a damp squib, as they won't use it during the race.
Sutil, meanwhile, has done a good job again - into the top 10 again (and bearing in mind that he was within a few hundredths of Massa's Ferrari in Q2). Just to ask, I assume that he used the harder tyre in Q3, as he did at Bahrein? Or did he try using the softer tyre? Liuzzi deserves a shout as well, for getting into 13th place - he might have been beaten by Sutil again, but Liuzzi is beginning to sharpen up. I only hope that Sutil can keep his nose clean at the first corner (literally - I'm worried that he'll end up with part of his wing missing by the time they are out of that corner).
Hulkenberg was pretty badly beaten by Rubens there - 0.7s between their Q2 times (and congratulations to Rubens for managing to claw his way into the top 10 as well). Perhaps, after last week, Hulkenberg has backed off a bit, or maybe it is just inexperience. Either way, that is going to sting a bit.
You're right about Buemi stealthily getting himself into the mid field - I don't think that many noticed that he had managed to get into 12th, when Jaime is back in 17th. However, the reason that nobody seems to have noticed is down to who is in 11th place, just ahead of Buemi...
Hamilton. What went wrong here? OK, I think the fact that Button managed to beat Hamilton in 2 of the three practise session indicated that he was in better form, but credit where it is due, Button managed to get a good lap and put the car in 4th place, which, given that Alonso and the Red Bull duo are so fast, was the best he could have hoped for.
What makes it more unusual is the fact that the onboard footage showed that Hamilton didn't make any major errors on his laps - perhaps the only sign of problems was the fact that the back end of the car looked to be sliding a bit more then normal, even allowing for Lewis's personal preference. But to be 0.6s behind Button when he was within 0.2s during practise (and that includes FP3) is odd. He did mention that he was lacking grip, which might be an indication that he and his engineers misjudged the set up - perhaps when the track cooled off in Q2, he was running the wrong tyre pressures?
On a side note, I think that we may yet hear a few more complains this weekend - for a start, Schumacher has complained quite a bit about being blocked by Hamilton and Alonso during qualifying - in particular, it was Alonso that he seemed most annoyed about. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82459
Meanwhile, Red Bull might find itself in trouble over it's suspension due to the fact that they are able to modify the ride height between qualifying and the race itself. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82461
Ross Brawn appears to be leading calls for the FIA and Charlie Whiting to clarify what the position of the FIA is on what adjustments to the suspension are permissible, whilst Whitmarsh is dubious about the legality of the Red Bull system (suggesting that it may fall under the regulations for active ride height management).
Speaking of Ross, he is also investigating the possibility of using a Mclaren style F vent, since he believes that it may offer a significant advantage. However, by contrast, Renault have stated pretty clearly that they think that the system is not worth copying, and have no intention of trying to replicate it, believing that more performance can be found elsewhere. http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82463 and http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82422 respectively.