Cynon wrote:tc3j3r wrote:Wizzie wrote:I've gotten to work on the new "Murphy's Law" section of the Hall of Shame. Any more suggestions in addition to the two I've already mentioned?
Michael Schumacher in China 2004? Felipe Massa in Hungary 2007?
What about Honda's entire existence from 2007-2008? I heard that Jenson Button said one of the Hondas from those years was so bad that no matter what they did to it, it just created a lot more drag... and if that's not Murphy's Law...
Chico Serra v. Raul Boesel, Canada, 1982. That's what belongs in the "Watch Your Ear!" section, not crap like Trulli v. Sutil in Brazil, 2009.
The 2007, and to a lesser extent. the 2008 Honda had some strange quirks. Normally, when you increase the angle of attack of the front wing elements, you increase the downforce, along with the drag, up until you reach the point where the wing stalls and the airflow separates from the wing. However, Button revealed that the RA107 had a very strange quirk - if you increased the front wing beyond a certain point, even though the wing had not stalled, the downforce at the front started to decrease - but, as a double whammy, the drag still increased. I think that the RA108 suffered from the same problem in testing, but I believe that they changed the front wing design for the first GP, and that solved the problem for the rest of the season.
Thinking about it, when Brawn took over the team and axed a load of staff, it was only really the engine division which he axed last year (because of the works deal with Mercedes), whilst a few more people have gone this year as part of the Mercedes takeover. Still, you wonder how many of those who were behind the RA 107 and RA108 - which can politely be called junk - are still at Mercedes now (and may partially explain why Mercedes are, frankly, underperforming).