BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

The place for speaking your mind on current goings-on in F1
User avatar
Ferrim
Posts: 1925
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 21:45

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Ferrim »

Guys, it's WAY too early to say that Renault have such a good car. At this point I think not even them know that. Sauber were leading the timesheets last year at this stage...

EDIT: mario, as usual, has explained it better than anyone of us could.
Go home, Bernie Ecclestone!

"There will be no other victory this year, I can tell you, more welcomed than this one" Bob Varsha, 1995 Canadian GP

F1 Rejects Forums – going off-topic since 2009!
User avatar
patrick
Posts: 439
Joined: 29 May 2010, 23:01
Location: lincs

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by patrick »

Inevitably, everyone's favorite silly season driver has been brought into the discussions:

MauriceHamilton Maurice Hamilton
Well-informed rally mates tell me Renault have been talking to Kimi's management team. They ought to talk to Ant Davidson.
User avatar
eagleash
Posts: 2222
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 18:22
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by eagleash »

A few test sessions often running at less than racing pace mean very little in comparison to the pressure & competition of a 3 day GP weekend & cannot conceivably disqualify a driver from "rookiedom". Nor does pre-season testing give any real indication of likely race times. Never has done in my experience. Not interested till quali at the first race.... :)
Everyone knows that Renault, logically, should go for a safe experienced driver (Heidfeld being the obvious choice). If Boullier were calling the shots that is what would happen but if Bahar & Co. have any input who knows what the decision would be. A lot is currently resting on Petrov's shoulders & he may need a helpful teammate/possible mentor to continue his learning curve.
DemocalypseNow wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
ElizabethSterling
Posts: 44
Joined: 30 Jan 2011, 19:23

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by ElizabethSterling »

Yeah, I'd like to help ground this - we don't know the Renault is any good yet, let's not get ahead of ourselves.
User avatar
patrick
Posts: 439
Joined: 29 May 2010, 23:01
Location: lincs

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by patrick »

Yesterday, Robert was able to talk to his doctors and relatives. His medication makes him sleep quite a lot, but he is responding to all external stimulation. He has reacted well to the news about his condition and is ready to fight for his comeback.

On Thursday, Robert should undergo some more surgery in order to stabilise the fractures to his right shoulder and right foot. Three or four days later, another operation will allow his elbow fracture to be stabilised as well.


from renault gp site. keep going bob!
ElizabethSterling
Posts: 44
Joined: 30 Jan 2011, 19:23

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by ElizabethSterling »

Image
Sweet merciful mother of god... suddenly I'm just glad he's alive.
User avatar
Ross Prawn
Posts: 724
Joined: 03 Apr 2009, 22:42
Location: Here

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Ross Prawn »

patrick wrote:Inevitably, everyone's favorite silly season driver has been brought into the discussions:

MauriceHamilton Maurice Hamilton
Well-informed rally mates tell me Renault have been talking to Kimi's management team. They ought to talk to Ant Davidson.


Can't believe this. Kimi will be too expensive and probably not fit enough for F1. Also he would not be interested in a stand-in role.
"Other than the car behind and the driver who might get a bit startled with the sudden explosion in front, it really isn't a major safety issue from that point of view,"
User avatar
patrick
Posts: 439
Joined: 29 May 2010, 23:01
Location: lincs

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by patrick »

Ross Prawn wrote:
patrick wrote:Inevitably, everyone's favorite silly season driver has been brought into the discussions:

MauriceHamilton Maurice Hamilton
Well-informed rally mates tell me Renault have been talking to Kimi's management team. They ought to talk to Ant Davidson.


Can't believe this. Kimi will be too expensive and probably not fit enough for F1. Also he would not be interested in a stand-in role.


Indeed, I don't doubt his fitness but it would take a lot of money to drag him away from his rally team at this stage. The car is already prepared for him. Although I don't think Renault will lie about talking to him this time around.

Edit: autosport reports that Liuzzi, Senna and Heidfeld are in the frame for the drive.
For his sake, I think Senna deserves a drive in a good car but I think Heidfeld would be a better bet for the team's WCC standing. Liuzzi is a gamble, and before anyone goes off about how "bad" he was last year I think he'd do a better job than Senna. But quick nick is going to fly again, it seems
User avatar
FullMetalJack
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6273
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 15:32
Location: Some place far away. Yes, that'll do.

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by FullMetalJack »

Quick Nick is the way to go, they need a reliable driver, especially with a guy like Petrov in the other car.

But if it's down to money, how about Sakon Yamamoto.
I like the way Snrub thinks!
User avatar
Henrique
Posts: 669
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 03:48
Location: Portugal

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Henrique »

Here's a computer simulation of the accident: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YE8GUwybi5k
Pedestrian
Posts: 156
Joined: 10 Mar 2010, 20:37

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Pedestrian »

The problem for Renault is that at the moment there really isn't a "safe option". They mostly have to choose between an experienced but known to be mediocre driver (Heidfeld, De la Rosa, ...) or a rookie who-might-be-great-one-day, but maybe not (Senna, Hulkenberg,...). Giving the seat to one of the existing reserve drivers might not be such a bad ideea because I don't think any of the other options is good enough to justify the additional costs of contracting them.
User avatar
Glennerz
Posts: 102
Joined: 06 Nov 2010, 20:34
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Glennerz »

Henrique wrote:Here's a computer simulation of the accident: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YE8GUwybi5k


That is really shocking - I had no idea the guardrail penetrated through the whole car like that. I would say Kubica was lucky; his situation could easily have been a whole lot worse.

It appears also that Petrov's manager has withdrawn him from any pre-season motorsport events as a precaution.
"Those (MasterCard-Lola) laps don't have a time, they've got an expiry date" -Unknown, 1997 Australian Grand Prix
User avatar
Aerond
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 3504
Joined: 25 Mar 2010, 19:26
Location: Anschlussland

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Aerond »

The only incentive of watching Heidfeld would be to see how many extra races can he add to make his record of most races without a win absolutely impossible to beat.
Tread lightly in ARWS. Every decision might be your last.
User avatar
FullMetalJack
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6273
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 15:32
Location: Some place far away. Yes, that'll do.

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by FullMetalJack »

Aerond wrote:The only incentive of watching Heidfeld would be to see how many extra races can he add to make his record of most races without a win absolutely impossible to beat.


He needs to surpass ADC first.
I like the way Snrub thinks!
User avatar
Mister Fungus
Posts: 351
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 16:09

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Mister Fungus »

I really believe Heidfeld could win in quick machinery, IMO he is the best option for Renault because I don't think Raikonnen would suddenly come back to F1.
karsten
Posts: 106
Joined: 13 Jan 2010, 08:11
Location: Prato, Italy

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by karsten »

i completely forgot about Kimi! It would be a good solution as he's fast and experienced and would help developing the car... but i guess he would ask for too much moneys...
Missing the good old Minardi! T_T
User avatar
DanielPT
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6126
Joined: 30 Dec 2010, 18:44
Location: Porto, Portugal

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by DanielPT »

karsten wrote:i completely forgot about Kimi! It would be a good solution as he's fast and experienced and would help developing the car...


Yes, I am already imagining Kimi spending days after days in the garage talking relentlessly to his mechanics and engineers until he has everything perfect! :lol:
Colin Kolles on F111, 2011 HRT challenger: The car doesn't look too bad; it looks like a modern F1 car.
User avatar
Paul Hayes
Posts: 1129
Joined: 17 Apr 2009, 19:54

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Paul Hayes »

Aerond wrote:The only incentive of watching Heidfeld would be to see how many extra races can he add to make his record of most races without a win absolutely impossible to beat.


He's forty or so short of even having that record (currently held by de Cesaris), so I don't think it will be coming his way anytime soon!
Myrvold
Posts: 1106
Joined: 28 Nov 2009, 21:03

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Myrvold »

It would not be wise from Kimi to return to F1. He has bought a Citroën, one of four, even thugh it should be five... He have his sponsors and team... I can't see Van Merksteijn being to happy if Kimi suddently ditches rally.
User avatar
shinji
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4007
Joined: 18 May 2009, 17:02
Location: Hibernia

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by shinji »

Kimi would probably moonlight in F1 and end up seriously damaging his right hand in a freak crash.

Poetic justice or something along those lines.


Hope to see Kubica back to his best, replacing whatever disappointment is plonked in the Renault, before too long. One of the few drivers who seems to genuinely love racing, and not the notability, fame and money that F1 brings (hence rallying in a race where the guardrail is of a standard that it slices through the car).
Better than 'Tour in a suit case' Takagi.
User avatar
Nuppiz
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 5966
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 12:10
Location: Vantaa, Finland
Contact:

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Nuppiz »

I don't see Kimi ever returning to F1. His name is merely a way to generate extra pressure on other candidates, but him actually returning is as possible as Karthikeyan winning the WDC this year.
Eurosport broadcast for the 1990 Mexican GP prequalifying:
"The Life, it looked very lifeless yet again... in fact Bruno did one, slow lap"
User avatar
Ferrim
Posts: 1925
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 21:45

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Ferrim »

Nuppiz wrote:I don't see Kimi ever returning to F1. His name is merely a way to generate extra pressure on other candidates, but him actually returning is as possible as Karthikeyan winning the WDC this year.


Are you suggesting that the F111 is not a World Championship capable car? :o
Go home, Bernie Ecclestone!

"There will be no other victory this year, I can tell you, more welcomed than this one" Bob Varsha, 1995 Canadian GP

F1 Rejects Forums – going off-topic since 2009!
Lord Fiddlebottom
Posts: 23
Joined: 15 Oct 2010, 00:12

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Lord Fiddlebottom »

Henrique wrote:Here's a computer simulation of the accident: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YE8GUwybi5k


I hadn't noticed the guardrail had gone through the car from the onboard cam posted before, but a second viewing made my stomach turn. We could have easily lost Kubica there.

Stills from the onboard cam showing the guardrail through the car. Most Disturbing.

Image Image Image
Jim Clark Forever
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 Dec 2010, 23:10
Location: Gloucestershire

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Jim Clark Forever »

The one thing that nobody seems to have mentioned is where this leaves Ferrari in 2012 - don't know about others but I for one was pretty convinced that Kubica was being lined up to replace Massa for 2012. As I others have said, and I have said before on on this thread, I would be very pleasantly surprised if we will see Kubica racing this year. So even if in a year's time it appears that he has recovered, would Ferrari take the risk on him? Would they stick with Massa or would they try and get someone else in? If the latter would they try and prize another top driver away or would they go really left field for soemone like Rossi? If so what would the arrival of another top driver other than his mate Kubica do for our friend Mr Alonso's temper?

Obviously none of us can answer these questions, but it is the kind of idle speculation that makes our passion for the sport so interesting, and it will be fascinating to see how things pan out.
User avatar
golic_2004
Posts: 928
Joined: 22 Dec 2010, 02:53
Location: Atlanta
Contact:

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by golic_2004 »

Liuzzi and Davidson have both played down rumors of being in the car.

Heidfeld or Raikkonen? Likely

Senna or Grosjean? Maybe

Hulkenberg? Possibly

Klien or De La Rosa? Likely not.

HWNSBNBM? Priceless (yes)
Williams in the last few years http://imgur.com/sNFFMYF
User avatar
eagleash
Posts: 2222
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 18:22
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by eagleash »

Jim Clark Forever wrote:The one thing that nobody seems to have mentioned is where this leaves Ferrari in 2012 - don't know about others but I for one was pretty convinced that Kubica was being lined up to replace Massa for 2012. As I others have said, and I have said before on on this thread, I would be very pleasantly surprised if we will see Kubica racing this year. So even if in a year's time it appears that he has recovered, would Ferrari take the risk on him? Would they stick with Massa or would they try and get someone else in? If the latter would they try and prize another top driver away or would they go really left field for soemone like Rossi? If so what would the arrival of another top driver other than his mate Kubica do for our friend Mr Alonso's temper?

Obviously none of us can answer these questions, but it is the kind of idle speculation that makes our passion for the sport so interesting, and it will be fascinating to see how things pan out.


Time will tell with all these points but even for F1 (& F1Rejects), it's a bit early to be starting the 2012 silly season thread... :o
DemocalypseNow wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
User avatar
Henrique
Posts: 669
Joined: 30 Mar 2009, 03:48
Location: Portugal

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Henrique »

I'm betting on Grosjean. Someone at Renault said, not too long ago, that they would like to see Grosjean back in F1 one day. Who knows? Maybe he's truly ready now.
User avatar
golic_2004
Posts: 928
Joined: 22 Dec 2010, 02:53
Location: Atlanta
Contact:

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by golic_2004 »

Henrique wrote:I'm betting on Grosjean. Someone at Renault said, not too long ago, that they would like to see Grosjean back in F1 one day. Who knows? Maybe he's truly ready now.


I see Grosjean as a promising driver. He just was not ready when he got the call to join them back in '09 and the car sucked then. He's older and wiser and he wants to focus on GP2 for this year though.
Williams in the last few years http://imgur.com/sNFFMYF
User avatar
Aerospeed
Posts: 4948
Joined: 22 Aug 2010, 18:58
Location: In too much snow right now

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Aerospeed »

Whoever replaces Kubica, he'll be the crappiest driver out of the list.
Mistakes in potatoes will ALWAYS happen :P
Trulli bad puns...
IN JAIL NO ONE CAN HEAR YOU SCREAM
User avatar
JohnMLTX
Posts: 307
Joined: 15 May 2010, 03:40
Location: People's Republic of Texas

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by JohnMLTX »

What about Jan Charouz, Ho Pin Tung, or even Fairuz Fauzy? No mention AT ALL of GLGR's OTHER three test drivers. I honestly would like to see the first Chinese F1 driver, or maybe another czech or malay. Anything to make F1 a bit more multicultural.
ibsey wrote:Things happen in my underwear, every time I hear those Ferrari's.
User avatar
eagleash
Posts: 2222
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 18:22
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by eagleash »

JohnMLTX wrote:What about Jan Charouz, Ho Pin Tung, or even Fairuz Fauzy? No mention AT ALL of GLGR's OTHER three test drivers. I honestly would like to see the first Chinese F1 driver, or maybe another czech or malay. Anything to make F1 a bit more multicultural.


They were mentioned earlier in the thread, (page 6), but no discussion has ensued. (Probably for good reason.) :)

The concensus of opinion seems to be that Heidfeld would do the best job for Renault, but he has apparently been without a drive & therefore available for much of this close season. They could possibly have had him in place as test/reserve driver, instead of Grosjean, Senna or Fauzy but they haven't. Too expensive? Don't rate him? Approached him but were turned down?
DemocalypseNow wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
User avatar
Glennerz
Posts: 102
Joined: 06 Nov 2010, 20:34
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Glennerz »

It would seem Lotus Renault's bunch of young reserve drivers are for testing/driver development more than actual race duties, and Heidfeld is the preferred option given his experience and the length of time Kubica is likely to be out. Also, if the car turns out to be as competitive as Bahar would hope, then it makes sense to put an established F1 driver like Heidfeld alongside Petrov, in order to get as much as they can out of this season in preperation for Robert's return. An experienced pair of hands like Nick could properly assess the effectiveness of the Renault's new exhaust system, movable rear wing etc., plus he has driven the new Pirelli tyres extensively in his testing role so can help along the car's development should Robert somehow return this year.
"Those (MasterCard-Lola) laps don't have a time, they've got an expiry date" -Unknown, 1997 Australian Grand Prix
User avatar
Ross Prawn
Posts: 724
Joined: 03 Apr 2009, 22:42
Location: Here

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Ross Prawn »

eagleash wrote:
JohnMLTX wrote:What about Jan Charouz, Ho Pin Tung, or even Fairuz Fauzy? No mention AT ALL of GLGR's OTHER three test drivers. I honestly would like to see the first Chinese F1 driver, or maybe another czech or malay. Anything to make F1 a bit more multicultural.


They were mentioned earlier in the thread, (page 6), but no discussion has ensued. (Probably for good reason.) :)

The concensus of opinion seems to be that Heidfeld would do the best job for Renault, but he has apparently been without a drive & therefore available for much of this close season. They could possibly have had him in place as test/reserve driver, instead of Grosjean, Senna or Fauzy but they haven't. Too expensive? Don't rate him? Approached him but were turned down?


Its a different circumstance. Normally you would go for a junior as a reserve driver, because its an investment in the future. You are training them up for eventual race status. And they are cheap. But now Renault are left without any experienced driver, which is what brings Nick into the picture.
"Other than the car behind and the driver who might get a bit startled with the sudden explosion in front, it really isn't a major safety issue from that point of view,"
User avatar
DanielPT
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6126
Joined: 30 Dec 2010, 18:44
Location: Porto, Portugal

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by DanielPT »

golic_2004 wrote:
Henrique wrote:I'm betting on Grosjean. Someone at Renault said, not too long ago, that they would like to see Grosjean back in F1 one day. Who knows? Maybe he's truly ready now.


I see Grosjean as a promising driver. He just was not ready when he got the call to join them back in '09 and the car sucked then. He's older and wiser and he wants to focus on GP2 for this year though.


It seems that Boullier is saying its between Senna, Heidfeld and Liuzzi so that pretty much rules out Grosjean. It makes sense, given Rrrrrmmmmnnnn has committed himself to GP2. Now, why, in the pecking order, he comes after Senna beats me...
Colin Kolles on F111, 2011 HRT challenger: The car doesn't look too bad; it looks like a modern F1 car.
User avatar
eagleash
Posts: 2222
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 18:22
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by eagleash »

Ross Prawn wrote:
eagleash wrote:
JohnMLTX wrote:What about Jan Charouz, Ho Pin Tung, or even Fairuz Fauzy? No mention AT ALL of GLGR's OTHER three test drivers. I honestly would like to see the first Chinese F1 driver, or maybe another czech or malay. Anything to make F1 a bit more multicultural.


They were mentioned earlier in the thread, (page 6), but no discussion has ensued. (Probably for good reason.) :)

The concensus of opinion seems to be that Heidfeld would do the best job for Renault, but he has apparently been without a drive & therefore available for much of this close season. They could possibly have had him in place as test/reserve driver, instead of Grosjean, Senna or Fauzy but they haven't. Too expensive? Don't rate him? Approached him but were turned down?


Its a different circumstance. Normally you would go for a junior as a reserve driver, because its an investment in the future. You are training them up for eventual race status. And they are cheap. But now Renault are left without any experienced driver, which is what brings Nick into the picture.


Don't disagree, "training up" a junior driver would be the conventional way to go, point being, Renault now have seemingly declared an interest in Nick, indicating that they maybe lack confidence in their current reserve drivers. That begs the question what would have happened if Petrov or Kubica had to miss part of the season later in the campaign? Heidfeld spent part of last season as Merc reserve driver. Seems slightly poor management to have 3 (or more) reserve drivers signed who will not now be used (possibly). & yes agree that Heidfeld would be the best choice as I posted earlier, but still wonder why neither Renault (nor any other team) seem to have made any attempt to get someone of his experience on board in the close season to date.
DemocalypseNow wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8267
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by mario »

DanielPT wrote:
golic_2004 wrote:
Henrique wrote:I'm betting on Grosjean. Someone at Renault said, not too long ago, that they would like to see Grosjean back in F1 one day. Who knows? Maybe he's truly ready now.


I see Grosjean as a promising driver. He just was not ready when he got the call to join them back in '09 and the car sucked then. He's older and wiser and he wants to focus on GP2 for this year though.


It seems that Boullier is saying its between Senna, Heidfeld and Liuzzi so that pretty much rules out Grosjean. It makes sense, given Rrrrrmmmmnnnn has committed himself to GP2. Now, why, in the pecking order, he comes after Senna beats me...

I think it was because he had already committed to GP2 before he agreed to become a test driver, and it seems that the plan was for Grosjean to spend a year or two in GP2 (in the Group Lotus backed GP2 team, of course) to build up more experience before having another crack at Formula 1.

Bruno Senna has competed in more races than Grosjean (18 compared to 7 for Grosjean), and having driven last year his experience is more recent; on top of that, he does not have additional motorsport commitments (and bear in mind that GP2 races are normally support races for F1 in the European rounds of the season). Coupled to that, there is the greater potential commercial interest in him and his name (and Bruno probably has more sponsor backing); seeing the Senna name written on the side of a black and gold car would create a lot of media attention.

So, in many ways, there is probably a greater incentive for Bruno to be in the car ahead of Grosjean (both commercial and experience wise), even if Grosjean is a promising driver.

eagleash wrote:Don't disagree, "training up" a junior driver would be the conventional way to go, point being, Renault now have seemingly declared an interest in Nick, indicating that they maybe lack confidence in their current reserve drivers. That begs the question what would have happened if Petrov or Kubica had to miss part of the season later in the campaign? Heidfeld spent part of last season as Merc reserve driver. Seems slightly poor management to have 3 (or more) reserve drivers signed who will not now be used (possibly). & yes agree that Heidfeld would be the best choice as I posted earlier, but still wonder why neither Renault (nor any other team) seem to have made any attempt to get someone of his experience on board in the close season to date.

I suppose that part of the reason why they didn't go for an experienced driver earlier was because they simply didn't think this would happen. If Kubica had, for whatever reason, been unable to drive during the season itself, that would not have been so bad as the car would already be fairly well developed, and Petrov would probably have gained enough experience to tide the team over for the short term as a nominal team leader.

It looks like all of their reserve drivers were really meant to be short term drivers for a handful of races, not long term replacements for either driver. And, on top of that, they were probably looking to replace Petrov, not Kubica; when you look at their driver line up, it makes more sense if they were lining up one of those drivers for the second seat.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
Jim Clark Forever
Posts: 9
Joined: 30 Dec 2010, 23:10
Location: Gloucestershire

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Jim Clark Forever »

eagleash wrote:Time will tell with all these points but even for F1 (& F1Rejects), it's a bit early to be starting the 2012 silly season thread... :o


It is never too early!! Does this mean that I win the prize for being first!

Moving back closer to topic, as Renualt have alrready said that it is between Heidfeld, Liuzzi, and Senna, doesn't this make all the discussion of other possible drivers somewhat academic?

Basically Renualt have three strategies open to them:

    1. soldier on with what they have
    2. use another but unemployed (in F1) driver
    3. try to acquire a driver from another F1 driver

Strategy 1 would mean Senna.

Under Strategy 2, given that an approach to Team Lotus would not be possible in the present climate, I would have thought that would only leave Glock as driver who would be clearly better than what they have already and who drives for a team where money might talk loudly enough. But this would still cost several millions (although maybe recoverable from any saving that might be made on Kubica's retainer), which the team might be loath to stump up.

It is under Strategy 3 that we have our fun. I would have thought that Heidfeld must be the strong favourite.

I have be very dissapointed that nobody has suggested JPM as one of the candiates - we could have had hours of fun speculating on whether this meant that the Theodore TY01 also had to dragged out of retirement as the only car big enough to hold him!
User avatar
fjackdaw
Posts: 1233
Joined: 11 Apr 2009, 21:00

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by fjackdaw »

Jim Clark Forever wrote:
eagleash wrote:Time will tell with all these points but even for F1 (& F1Rejects), it's a bit early to be starting the 2012 silly season thread... :o


It is never too early!! Does this mean that I win the prize for being first!

Moving back closer to topic, as Renualt have alrready said that it is between Heidfeld, Liuzzi, and Senna, doesn't this make all the discussion of other possible drivers somewhat academic?

Basically Renualt have three strategies open to them:

    1. soldier on with what they have
    2. use another but unemployed (in F1) driver
    3. try to acquire a driver from another F1 driver

Strategy 1 would mean Senna.

Under Strategy 2, given that an approach to Team Lotus would not be possible in the present climate, I would have thought that would only leave Glock as driver who would be clearly better than what they have already and who drives for a team where money might talk loudly enough. But this would still cost several millions (although maybe recoverable from any saving that might be made on Kubica's retainer), which the team might be loath to stump up.

It is under Strategy 3 that we have our fun. I would have thought that Heidfeld must be the strong favourite.

I have be very dissapointed that nobody has suggested JPM as one of the candiates - we could have had hours of fun speculating on whether this meant that the Theodore TY01 also had to dragged out of retirement as the only car big enough to hold him!


I think this needs a proof-read - it doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Have you got categories 2 & 3 backwards? And I presume by "driver" in category 3 you mean "team". :)

And if discussing other drivers than those three is academic, why mention Glock or category 3 at all?
User avatar
eagleash
Posts: 2222
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 18:22
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by eagleash »

Jim Clark Forever wrote:
eagleash wrote:Time will tell with all these points but even for F1 (& F1Rejects), it's a bit early to be starting the 2012 silly season thread... :o


It is never too early!! Does this mean that I win the prize for being first!


Nope. More likely a flaming Papaya accompanied by something akin to that big noise off "QI"..... :)

Oh & fjackdaw said the rest......(mostly).......
DemocalypseNow wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
User avatar
Ferrim
Posts: 1925
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 21:45

Re: BBC news quoting Robert Kubica 'seriously injured'

Post by Ferrim »

The whole "Senna, Heidfeld and Liuzzi" thing is just a result of someone doing naff journalism and then everyone else translating from what he was reporting.

http://webtv.ivg.it/2011/02/08/renault- ... -in-pista/

Boullier was asked about possible replacements and the journalist was the one who introduced the names of Senna, Heidfeld and Liuzzi. Boullier said that they were talking with them, but with other drivers as well. Watch from minute 1:04 onwards (if you understand Italian or can somehow hear Boullier's words over the Italian translator).

Autosport and every other media have got it factually wrong.
Go home, Bernie Ecclestone!

"There will be no other victory this year, I can tell you, more welcomed than this one" Bob Varsha, 1995 Canadian GP

F1 Rejects Forums – going off-topic since 2009!
Post Reply