The wonderful world of shoe spam!

thehemogoblin · Post by **thehemogoblin** » 17 Aug 2010, 21:18

Phoenix wrote:
thehemogoblin wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:And we'll have more time for sexiness to boot.

I hope you guys are fans of scraggly beards.

Urm, no...what are you thinking now?

Oh, nothing. I just haven't shaved in a couple weeks.

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 18 Aug 2010, 15:41

thehemogoblin wrote:
Oh, nothing. I just haven't shaved in a couple weeks.

Time to grab your Gillette, then.

thehemogoblin · Post by **thehemogoblin** » 18 Aug 2010, 19:17

Phoenix wrote:
thehemogoblin wrote:
Oh, nothing. I just haven't shaved in a couple weeks.

Time to grab your Gillette, then.

It's the best a man can get (apart from a lady friend).

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 18 Aug 2010, 22:23

thehemogoblin wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
thehemogoblin wrote:
Oh, nothing. I just haven't shaved in a couple weeks.

Time to grab your Gillette, then.

It's the best a man can get (apart from a lady friend).

Certainly. A smooth and effective shaving is always paramount to increase one's sexiness. Talking about, seems the new software is being effective in keeping spambots away

Kuwashima · Post by **Kuwashima** » 22 Aug 2010, 13:22

How are we looking here guys? More/less spam?

shinji · Post by **shinji** » 22 Aug 2010, 13:59

Kuwashima wrote:How are we looking here guys? More/less spam?

Definitely less by the looks of it.

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 22 Aug 2010, 15:43

shinji wrote:
Kuwashima wrote:How are we looking here guys? More/less spam?

Definitely less by the looks of it.

Less? They've been no spam since you guys use this new software! Good job indeed!

CarlosFerreira · Post by **CarlosFerreira** » 22 Aug 2010, 16:10

Kuwashima wrote:How are we looking here guys? More/less spam?

None whatsoever to report from my side this last week. Working brilliantly.

watka · Post by **watka** » 22 Aug 2010, 16:26

Okay, so it looks like we can finally fire Carlos and the Goblin then.

thehemogoblin · Post by **thehemogoblin** » 22 Aug 2010, 18:40

I've seen two or three pieces, that's all.

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 23 Aug 2010, 15:21

thehemogoblin wrote:I've seen two or three pieces, that's all.

Damn, and I thought we would have an excuse now to give us guys the boot :twisted:

thehemogoblin · Post by **thehemogoblin** » 23 Aug 2010, 17:09

Phoenix wrote:
thehemogoblin wrote:I've seen two or three pieces, that's all.

Damn, and I thought we would have an excuse now to give us guys the boot

Just because you've got more posts than I doesn't mean anything.

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 24 Aug 2010, 19:42

thehemogoblin wrote:
Phoenix wrote:
thehemogoblin wrote:I've seen two or three pieces, that's all.

Damn, and I thought we would have an excuse now to give us guys the boot

Just because you've got more posts than I doesn't mean anything.

I still have less posts than Carlos; it's not relevant.

Post by **tommykl** » 25 Aug 2010, 17:07

Well, spam's back in the Stoddart forum!

Kuwashima · Post by **Kuwashima** » 25 Aug 2010, 23:49

I might have to check when this offending poster registered ie before or after the new measures.

CarlosFerreira · Post by **CarlosFerreira** » 31 Aug 2010, 08:15

Picked up a flower spammer (no, really!), but he had registered some time in May. The dam is holding, Jamie.

Viresh · Post by **Viresh** » 24 Sep 2010, 13:22

Even i am thinking the same it would perfectly fit the image of both organizations.

f1-gast · Post by **f1-gast** » 23 Nov 2010, 11:17

f1-gast · Post by **f1-gast** » 23 Nov 2010, 11:18

lol the spamboys are getting creatiever ?

Pointrox · Post by **Pointrox** » 23 Nov 2010, 16:45

Frankly, what's the problem in just removing the old pads and replacing them with the new ones?
I mean, how hard can it be?

ADx_Wales · Post by **ADx_Wales** » 23 Nov 2010, 17:02

If JC Whitney want to advertise to the masses they've come to the wrong place.

TomWazzleshaw · Post by **TomWazzleshaw** » 04 Dec 2010, 21:48

I'm sorry but the only electronics we specialise in are McLaren ECUs

the Masked Lapwing · Post by **the Masked Lapwing** » 16 Jan 2011, 10:13

Joe77 wrote:Spammers are getting rampant nowadays and what I really don't like about them is that they leave violent comments which is not really true. They just leave bad comments without understanding the topic and they have no respect to the forum administrators which dedicate their time and effort just to give significant information and ideas to the people.

So what's this "Shakeology" thing that you are trying to sell? I can't be bothered clicking the various links.

JohnMLTX · Post by **JohnMLTX** » 16 Jan 2011, 23:46

the Masked Lapwing wrote:
Joe77 wrote:Spammers are getting rampant nowadays and what I really don't like about them is that they leave violent comments which is not really true. They just leave bad comments without understanding the topic and they have no respect to the forum administrators which dedicate their time and effort just to give significant information and ideas to the people.

So what's this "Shakeology" thing that you are trying to sell? I can't be bothered clicking the various links.

TomWazzleshaw · Post by **TomWazzleshaw** » 29 Jan 2011, 03:47

ramir wrote:well i had finished the test drive for my Lamborghini gallardo to check whether it will be performs good and if the engine will be perfectly run smooth. and also checking the bumper if it will loose fouling on tow bar.

You sir, are *insert word(s) here* and a spammer. I mean why fit a Gallardo or any Supercar for that matter with a TOWBAR?

Post by **tommykl** » 11 Feb 2011, 16:39

What the bathplug are you talking about?

Klon · Post by **Klon** » 11 Feb 2011, 16:56

I think we've encountered another spambot here.

DanielPT · Post by **DanielPT** » 11 Feb 2011, 17:04

reported...

Barbazza · Post by **Barbazza** » 11 Feb 2011, 21:05

robinna wrote:What more could i do to my 96' grand prix to make it faster? My 96' grand prix GTP has great acceleration, but not overall speed, i have added flow masters and a larger fuel pan, what are more simple additions i could make to it to make it faster, looking to spend less than 3 grand.

Speak to the Shannon Group, they'll probably sell you a Forti chassis.

Wookey · Post by **Wookey** » 17 May 2011, 09:03

This is so great a thread! I had a very bad day, so this just made me so happy!

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 17 May 2011, 16:41

Wookey wrote::lol:

This is so great a thread! I had a very bad day, so this just made me so happy!

Phew. I thought spammers were back in full flight and seeking revenge, and I am at the battlefront this time :lol:

FMecha · Post by **FMecha** » 26 May 2011, 08:36

Latest spam update: During the Spanish GP

Phoenix · Post by **Phoenix** » 26 May 2011, 15:14

FMecha wrote:Latest spam update: During the Spanish GP

T'was my capping!

TomWazzleshaw · Post by **TomWazzleshaw** » 21 Aug 2011, 05:37

Spambot alert!

Post by **Londoner** » 21 Aug 2011, 08:17

Wizzie wrote:Spambot alert!

I had to speak it up, didn't I.

I wonder how they managed to breach the forum software?

Post by **Londoner** » 05 Sep 2011, 10:58

Just been reading through this thread again (because I'm bored and sixth form doesn't start until next week) and I've just noticed that a thread by the name of 'Unrecognised Reject Actions', has been placed in this thread and appears to have been there for nearly two years.

Maybe this action is another for that thread, as no-one else seems to have recognised it, the moderators merging a proper thread into the shoe spam thread!

dr-baker · Post by **dr-baker** » 28 Sep 2011, 12:34

This, plus a repeat in this forum.

Post by **mario** » 28 Sep 2011, 12:41

dr-baker wrote:This, plus a repeat in this forum.

Seen it, and promptly removed (that spammer had also tried some of the other parts of the forum too).

dr-baker · Post by **dr-baker** » 28 Sep 2011, 15:27

mario wrote:
dr-baker wrote:This, plus a repeat in this forum.

Seen it, and promptly removed (that spammer had also tried some of the other parts of the forum too).

Yeah, it seemed to be appearing as I was linking to it. Very Prompt work, Mr Moderator Sir.

the Masked Lapwing · Post by **the Masked Lapwing** » 28 Sep 2011, 22:59

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4476
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4478
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=4477

I wonder why he didn't spam the JDD forum?