WeirdKerr wrote:Engines grenading themselves spectacularly...
I would say I also miss engines grenading themselves spectacularly (whatever Sir Jackie might have to say on the matter after the 1997 season), but it's more than that - it's unreliablity in general, which creates unpredictability. Only the other day I saw Richard Hammond driving a 2005 Renault on
Top Gear (or, at least, he was trying to drive it, and making Jean-Denis Délétraz look legendary in the process. "What is Hammond doing?") - and described the car as fragile, highly strung, built to such impossible tolerances that everything needs to be warmed up before it would start - anything could go wrong at any minute. And yet, by 2005, unreliability had already dropped to a level where the points had to go down to 8th place, otherwise Ferrari, McLaren and Renault would hog them all and there might be one or two points for one or two other teams over the course of the season. Cars blowing up left, right and centre were no longer seen. And now, with points down to 10th, accuse that of being Mickey Mouse all you like but it has to be done to ensure that more than four or five teams get on the scoresheet this year.
We're never going to see the likes of the 1991 San Mariono Grand Prix ever again; JJ Lehto on the podium for Scuderia Italia, and both the Lotus cars in fifth and sixth - Mika Häkkinen before he was famous, and bona fide reject Julian Bailey. Imagine, if you will, a race in 2010 where either Heikki Kovalainen or Jarno Trulli takes one of the Lotus seats, Fairuz Fauzy gets the other, and the hopelessly-off-the-pace T127s (which were as far behind the leaders as the 102B was in 1991), and the two drivers end up fifth and sixth. It couldn't happen! The best that car could manage was a fluky 12th, which was only allowed to happen by five cars not making it to the end of the first lap.
Never mind Pirelli's fragile tyres, fragile cars would jazz things up a bit the way it always used to be.