F1 Rejects Track Designing Competition

UncreativeUsername37 · Post by **UncreativeUsername37** » 19 Oct 2013, 17:54

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6116550

Peteroli34 · Post by **Peteroli34** » 19 Oct 2013, 19:22

Well that was quite a difficult task espuaclly trying to find an are where you can use public roads to get the correct length, finally managed to do one

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6116634

dr-baker · Post by **dr-baker** » 19 Oct 2013, 19:34

Here's my attempt. Obvious attempt at reinserting La Source at around the 3.5km point. And maybe a pit lane at the 5.2km point?

watka · Post by **watka** » 20 Oct 2013, 23:00

Here's mine. It looks frightening, lots of sweepers and chicanes: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6117684

roblo97 · Post by **roblo97** » 21 Oct 2013, 10:10

here is my Hornay f1 track design :lol:

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com?r=6117965

go_Rubens · Post by **go_Rubens** » 21 Oct 2013, 20:35

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6118492

Post by **tommykl** » 22 Oct 2013, 11:16

roblomas52 wrote:here is my Hornay f1 track design
http://www.gmap-pedometer.com?r=6117965

I approve of this location :mrgreen:

Not of what you did with it, just the location

UncreativeUsername37 · Post by **UncreativeUsername37** » 23 Oct 2013, 20:35

UgncreativeUsergname: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6116550
peteroli34: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6116634
dr-baker: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6116644
watka: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6117684
roblomas52: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com?r=6117965
go_Rubens: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6118492

UncreativeUsername37 · Post by **UncreativeUsername37** » 23 Oct 2013, 20:55

Best
1. peteroli34
2. dr-baker

Worst
1. roblomas52
2. go_Rubens

This was hard. Everyone was good this round.

watka · Post by **watka** » 23 Oct 2013, 22:19

Best
1. peteroli34
2. dr-baker

Worst
1. UgncreativeUsergname
2. go_Rubens

go_Rubens · Post by **go_Rubens** » 23 Oct 2013, 23:31

Best

1. dr-baker
2. watka

Worst

1. roblomas52
2. UgncreativeUsergname

Peteroli34 · Post by **Peteroli34** » 24 Oct 2013, 09:49

Good

Watka
UgncreativeUsergname

Not So

roblomas52
go_Rubens

pi314159 · Post by **pi314159** » 24 Oct 2013, 16:01

Good:
1) Watka - if they wouldn't already have Spa, they should build this track.
2) peteroli34

Last Row of the grid:
1) go_Rubens
2) roblomas52

roblo97 · Post by **roblo97** » 25 Oct 2013, 16:53

good
Watka
dr-baker

not so good
go-Rubens
UgncreativeUsergname

go_Rubens · Post by **go_Rubens** » 28 Oct 2013, 01:22

Best

1. watka (22)
2. dr-baker (18)
3. peteroli34 (16)
4. UgncreativeUsergname (4)

Well, watka's turn this time around for glory, and a good track design theme.

Worst

1. go_Rubens (24)
2. UgncreativeUsergname (18)
3. roblomas52 (16)

Hotly contested. I thought I had a winner. No really...

dr-baker · Post by **dr-baker** » 28 Oct 2013, 12:26

Ahh, frustrating. I really hoped I had enough nominations to win. Maybe next time?

watka · Post by **watka** » 29 Oct 2013, 01:23

Thanks guys!

The next theme will be SEBASTIAN VETTEL. The track must be based in or around Heppenheim, Germany - Vettel's place of birth. To be a little clearer, the track may not reach:

- Any further north than Bensheim
- Any further south than Hemsbach
- Any further west than Lorsch
- Any further east than Sonderbach

The track should be between 3.5km and 8km long. Use public roads as far as possible (i.e. at least 80%).

UncreativeUsername37 · Post by **UncreativeUsername37** » 29 Oct 2013, 04:36

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6125311
Used my "free 20%" to tear out roundabouts and dividers.

Peteroli34 · Post by **Peteroli34** » 29 Oct 2013, 10:57

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6125427

roblo97 · Post by **roblo97** » 29 Oct 2013, 19:29

My Tribute to Vettel

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com?r=6125828
only 7.1KM

go_Rubens · Post by **go_Rubens** » 29 Oct 2013, 22:35

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6126061

dr-baker · Post by **dr-baker** » 30 Oct 2013, 17:00

Voila.

AxelP800 · Post by **AxelP800** » 02 Nov 2013, 11:08

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6128846

Hope it's still Heppenheim.....

pi314159 · Post by **pi314159** » 02 Nov 2013, 11:29

I'm going for most rejecful track with this AVUS remake:

http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6128880

watka · Post by **watka** » 02 Nov 2013, 15:28

AxelP800 wrote:http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6128846

Hope it's still Heppenheim.....

Yep, that's fine. You can use the "labels" checkbox to check in the future.

dr-baker · Post by **dr-baker** » 02 Nov 2013, 22:55

watka wrote:
AxelP800 wrote:http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6128846

Hope it's still Heppenheim.....

Yep, that's fine. You can use the "labels" checkbox to check in the future.

Forgive my ignorance, but I can't see that checkbox when I am on the site. Where should I be looking to see it?

go_Rubens · Post by **go_Rubens** » 02 Nov 2013, 23:07

dr-baker wrote:
watka wrote:
AxelP800 wrote:http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6128846

Hope it's still Heppenheim.....

Yep, that's fine. You can use the "labels" checkbox to check in the future.

Forgive my ignorance, but I can't see that checkbox when I am on the site. Where should I be looking to see it?

The checkbox is under the "satellite" button. Click on satellite and it automatically pops up.

dr-baker · Post by **dr-baker** » 02 Nov 2013, 23:13

go_Rubens wrote:The checkbox is under the "satellite" button. Click on satellite and it automatically pops up.

Ah-ha. Useful.

But that's just the same info as is available if you click on the "map" button! Which is what I usually use...

go_Rubens · Post by **go_Rubens** » 02 Nov 2013, 23:14

dr-baker wrote:
go_Rubens wrote:The checkbox is under the "satellite" button. Click on satellite and it automatically pops up.

Ah-ha. Useful.

But that's just the same info as is available if you click on the "map" button! Which is what I usually use...

Apparently, it works either way. So you're good, then!

watka · Post by **watka** » 02 Nov 2013, 23:42

When I'm voting, I always view the tracks in satellite form to get a better understanding of the elevation and local features, which helps me determine how good the track is!

go_Rubens · Post by **go_Rubens** » 03 Nov 2013, 04:19

watka wrote:When I'm voting, I always view the tracks in satellite form to get a better understanding of the elevation and local features, which helps me determine how good the track is!

And the same goes here, simply because I don't like the look of a normal street map :lol:

UncreativeUsername37 · Post by **UncreativeUsername37** » 04 Nov 2013, 18:38

UgncreativeUsergname: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6125311
peteroli34: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6125427
roblomas52: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com?r=6125828
go_Rubens: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6126061
dr-baker: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6126668
AxelP800: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6128846
pi314159: http://www.gmap-pedometer.com/?r=6128880

go_Rubens · Post by **go_Rubens** » 04 Nov 2013, 22:45

Best

1. AxelP800
2. UgncreativeUsergname

Worst

1. roblomas52
2. pi314159

UncreativeUsername37 · Post by **UncreativeUsername37** » 04 Nov 2013, 22:58

Uses roads wider than four metres
1. AxelP800
2. go_Rubens

Sucks
1. roblomas52
2. dr-baker

watka · Post by **watka** » 04 Nov 2013, 23:17

Woo hoo
1. UgncreativeUsergname
2. peteroli34 - when are you going to design a track that I don't like?

Uh oh
1. roblomas52 - although if this was to design a rally stage, you'd win!
2. pi314159 - helping you with your aim to finish last!

Peteroli34 · Post by **Peteroli34** » 07 Nov 2013, 18:08

Good

UgncreativeUsergname
AxelP800

Not So

pi314159
dr-baker

AxelP800 · Post by **AxelP800** » 09 Nov 2013, 16:23

Good ones
Peteroli34
UgncreativeUsergname

Not so good ones
pi3141
...........one is enough

Can I do this?

UncreativeUsername37 · Post by **UncreativeUsername37** » 09 Nov 2013, 16:53

AxelP800 wrote:...........one is enough Can I do this?

We'll just say your second vote was roblomas52.

roblo97 · Post by **roblo97** » 09 Nov 2013, 17:00

UgncreativeUsergname wrote:
AxelP800 wrote:...........one is enough Can I do this?

We'll just say your second vote was roblomas52.

Come on, my track wasn't that bad was it?

AxelP800 · Post by **AxelP800** » 09 Nov 2013, 17:33

In that case, this is my re-vote

Good ones
Peteroli34
UgncreativeUsergname

Not so good ones
pi3141
go_Rubens