Re: Forum Facts
Posted: 02 Sep 2013, 17:06
I tried using the friend function to see what it would do. The thing is, I don't know if it did anything or not ![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
A tribute to the heroic failures of Grand Prix racing
https://ftp.gprejects.com/forum/
HawkAussie wrote:Oh Oh
dr-baker wrote:HawkAussie wrote:Oh Oh
![]()
![]()
![]()
East Londoner wrote:dr-baker wrote:HawkAussie wrote:Oh Oh
![]()
![]()
![]()
I think it's because he's renamed his account. But still, what a confusing post.![]()
At this rate, I'm gonna be the only user on here apart from the Australian overlords who won't have renamed.![]()
East Londoner wrote:I think it's because he's renamed his account.
CoopsII wrote:East Londoner wrote:I think it's because he's renamed his account.
Who was he/she before?
apple2009 wrote:CoopsII wrote:East Londoner wrote:I think it's because he's renamed his account.
Who was he/she before?
"Matt121"
dr-baker wrote:apple2009 wrote:CoopsII wrote:Who was he/she before?
"Matt121"
It's in his signature.
dr-baker wrote:apple2009 wrote:CoopsII wrote:"Matt121"
It's in his signature.
Exactly.
dr-baker wrote:It's in his signature.
CoopsII wrote:dr-baker wrote:It's in his signature.
Oh. Well, that just proves I rarely read the singatures as they quote often seem full of gibberish with an optional self-indulgent link to some Youtube clip I'm unlikely to find interesting.
Why change names?
AustralianStig wrote:dr-baker wrote:apple2009 wrote:It's in his signature.
Exactly.
Not ANOTHER AgreesWithYou commenter...
apple2009 wrote:AustralianStig wrote:Not ANOTHER AgreesWithYou commenter...
AustralianStig wrote:apple2009 wrote:AustralianStig wrote:Not ANOTHER AgreesWithYou commenter...
Basically it's repeatedly creating posts just to say you agree with the post above. The cynic in me thinks it's just to inflate post counts.
apple2009 wrote:AustralianStig wrote:
Basically it's repeatedly creating posts just to say you agree with the post above. The cynic in me thinks it's just to inflate post counts.
I agree.
madmark1974 wrote:CoopsII wrote:Why change names?
I don't know ... Perhaps because you've been away from the site for a few months and then forgotten your password or something ... Anyone daft enough to do something like that?
(OK So I'm aware that CoopsII is a separate account to the 'old' Coops but you get my point!)
dr-baker wrote:apple2009 wrote:AustralianStig wrote:
Basically it's repeatedly creating posts just to say you agree with the post above. The cynic in me thinks it's just to inflate post counts.
I agree.
Oh dear. Not a way to win friends, right there.
CoopsII wrote:madmark1974 wrote:CoopsII wrote:Why change names?
I don't know ... Perhaps because you've been away from the site for a few months and then forgotten your password or something ... Anyone daft enough to do something like that?
(OK So I'm aware that CoopsII is a separate account to the 'old' Coops but you get my point!)
Theres too many goddamn passwords in this world. Im pretty sure Itunes must be severely pissed up with me because of the amount of passwords Ive had to reset. I eventually settled for Anotherbloodypassword followed by a three digit number. I now cannot remember that three digit number and so its locked again and I need a new password.
Anyway.
What I meant was why change your current useable name? It seems a bit of a random thing to do and likely to confuse the sort of person who cant remember an itunes password.
Ataxia wrote:CoopsII wrote:What I meant was why change your current useable name? It seems a bit of a random thing to do and likely to confuse the sort of person who cant remember an itunes password.
I changed my old username because it was stupid. Next question.
CoopsII wrote:Why change names?
madmark1974 wrote:(OK So I'm aware that CoopsII is a separate account to the 'old' Coops but you get my point!)
takagi_for_the_win wrote:madmark1974 wrote:(OK So I'm aware that CoopsII is a separate account to the 'old' Coops but you get my point!)
Here's one I never worked out; is CoopsII the same person as Coops or not?
tommykl wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:madmark1974 wrote:(OK So I'm aware that CoopsII is a separate account to the 'old' Coops but you get my point!)
Here's one I never worked out; is CoopsII the same person as Coops or not?
Yes, yes it is.
HawkAussie wrote:tommykl wrote:takagi_for_the_win wrote:Here's one I never worked out; is CoopsII the same person as Coops or not?
Yes, yes it is.
Since when
This wrote:I have easily the most creative name in the whole history of the forum, but i have to dissapoint you, i have no plans to change it.
CoopsII wrote:This wrote:I have easily the most creative name in the whole history of the forum, but i have to dissapoint you, i have no plans to change it.
I hope nobody joins and calls themselves 'That' as it could get messy.
This wrote:I have easily the most creative name in the whole history of the forum, but i have to dissapoint you, i have no plans to change it.
apple2009 wrote:Who were the Indian hackers and what did they want?
dr-baker wrote:East Londoner wrote:
At this rate, I'm gonna be the only user on here apart from the Australian overlords who won't have renamed.![]()
I have no intention of changing my user name either, mostly because I can't think of anything I would rather change it to.
roblomas52 wrote:dr-baker wrote:East Londoner wrote:
At this rate, I'm gonna be the only user on here apart from the Australian overlords who won't have renamed.![]()
I have no intention of changing my user name either, mostly because I can't think of anything I would rather change it to.
I was thinking some time ago of chainging mine to The_Inhospitable_Hobnob
watka wrote:I am Watka. And will always be Watka. Except to my old work colleagues, who preferred to call me Watko. And my mum, who calls me Ashley.
watka wrote:I am Watka. And will always be Watka. Except to my old work colleagues, who preferred to call me Watko. And my mum, who calls me Ashley.