Grand Prix Rejects

Posted: **21 Jun 2013, 14:03**

Just wondering, does anyone know the fuel load penalty (the time loss from a lap of fuel) for these circuits:

Imola
Indianapolis
Magny-Cours
Silverstone (pre-2010)
Spielberg (1997-2003)

Posted: **22 Jun 2013, 09:29**

I don't know where I should put this but what the bathplug just I found out? :shock:

42 wheels, multiple engines, and it's officially designed by BMW itself! Looks more ambitious than...

Posted: **22 Jun 2013, 10:12**

FMecha wrote:I don't know where I should put this but what the bathplug just I found out?

42 wheels, multiple engines, and it's officially designed by BMW itself! Looks more ambitious than...

What in the Green Hell is that?

Also,that Lion F1 projects knocked my shoes off laughing at the amount of wheels on that car. Especially with the wheels containing an entire Sponsor's name.

Posted: **22 Jun 2013, 12:59**

good_Ralf wrote:Just wondering, does anyone know the fuel load penalty (the time loss from a lap of fuel) for these circuits:

Imola
Indianapolis
Magny-Cours
Silverstone (pre-2010)
Spielberg (1997-2003)

For pre-2010 spec Silverstone, the indication is that the fuel penalty would be in the order of about 0.35-0.4s per 10kg of fuel (according to this article http://www.racecar-engineering.com/arti ... tech-data/ from Renault). I believe, but cannot be sure, that the fuel penalty at Magny Cours was also in the order of about 0.35s per 10kg.

Posted: **22 Jun 2013, 13:29**

WaffleCat wrote:
FMecha wrote:I don't know where I should put this but what the bathplug just I found out?

42 wheels, multiple engines, and it's officially designed by BMW itself! Looks more ambitious than...

What in the Green Hell is that?

Also,that Lion F1 projects knocked my shoes off laughing at the amount of wheels on that car. Especially with the wheels containing an entire Sponsor's name.

It was part of a Jalopnik reader competition that BMW decided to partake in.

http://jalopnik.com/5980101/help-a-four ... -dream-car

http://jalopnik.com/5982018/bmw-designs ... r+year-old

Posted: **22 Jun 2013, 15:44**

I was just pondering whether or not Id have been a bit more interested in Mercedes-Secret-Test-Session-Although-How-You-Conduct-A-Secret-Test-Session-When-F1-Cars-Tend-To-Make-A-Real-Racket-I-Do-Not-Know-Gate if I actually thought Mercedes were in with a chance of winning the championship. Which I dont.

Sod it. Im going to listen to some Kraftwerk to see if I can gain an insight into the German psyche.

Posted: **23 Jun 2013, 13:38**

FMecha wrote:I don't know where I should put this but what the bathplug just I found out?

42 wheels, multiple engines, and it's officially designed by BMW itself! Looks more ambitious than...

Looks an awesome car but whatever you do don't let Grosjean, Maldonado, Cecotto, Neate, or Duno near it

Posted: **23 Jun 2013, 16:08**

This is a forum related ponder, rather than an F1 ponder: Is it just me, or has Dr Baker been posting about females more often over the past couple of weeks than he normally does?

Posted: **23 Jun 2013, 16:28**

takagi_for_the_win wrote:This is a forum related ponder, rather than an F1 ponder: Is it just me, or has Dr Baker been posting about females more often over the past couple of weeks than he normally does?

My bestofbrummie persona when imitating The F1 Slate has become contagious. Either that or he's pulled.

Posted: **23 Jun 2013, 19:32**

FullMetalJack wrote:
takagi_for_the_win wrote:This is a forum related ponder, rather than an F1 ponder: Is it just me, or has Dr Baker been posting about females more often over the past couple of weeks than he normally does?

My bestofbrummie persona when imitating The F1 Slate has become contagious. Either that or he's pulled.

I reckon its the latter. Baker, you sly dog you!

Posted: **23 Jun 2013, 21:09**

takagi_for_the_win wrote:
FullMetalJack wrote:
takagi_for_the_win wrote:This is a forum related ponder, rather than an F1 ponder: Is it just me, or has Dr Baker been posting about females more often over the past couple of weeks than he normally does?

My bestofbrummie persona when imitating The F1 Slate has become contagious. Either that or he's pulled.

I reckon its the latter. Baker, you sly dog you!

I wish... Just reverting to my former stereotype and trying to induce Baker's Law. Success!

Posted: **26 Jun 2013, 21:47**

Just discovered that if you go into incognito mode with Chrome you can read Autosport.com for ever. Restart the browser and you are back to 20 articles. :twisted:

Posted: **27 Jun 2013, 11:32**

If Lotus is referred to as Team Enstone because of the number of changes of ownership (Toleman -> Benetton -> Renault -> Lotus), why isn't Mercedes being referred to as Team Brackley (Tyrrell -> BAR -> Honda -> Brawn -> Mecedes) and Force India as Team Silverstone (Jordan -> Midland -> Spyker -> Force India)? They have both had at least as many ownership changes over a shorter time span.

Posted: **27 Jun 2013, 11:40**

I don't know if I'm alone here, but now there's a space at RedBull for 2014 am I right in thinking ToroRosso might as well close down shop if neither of their drivers gets Webber's seat? I mean, thats the sole reason ToroRosso exist isn't it? To find the next RedBull driver?

Posted: **27 Jun 2013, 11:41**

dr-baker wrote:If Lotus is referred to as Team Enstone because of the number of changes of ownership (Toleman -> Benetton -> Renault -> Lotus), why isn't Mercedes being referred to as Team Brackley (Tyrrell -> BAR -> Honda -> Brawn -> Mecedes) and Force India as Team Silverstone (Jordan -> Midland -> Spyker -> Force India)? They have both had at least as many ownership changes over a shorter time span.

Unless I'm mistaken, because Mercedes and Force India are the owners of their teams, whereas Lotus is just a 'branding partner' (as I believe they wanted to be known) - the team should really be called Genii Capital, shouldn't it?

Also, I think the Lotus name is due to be dropped again at the end of the year, isn't it?

Posted: **27 Jun 2013, 21:33**

madmark1974 wrote:Also, I think the Lotus name is due to be dropped again at the end of the year, isn't it?

Dropped for what, I wonder? I haven't heard that rumour before.

Posted: **27 Jun 2013, 22:16**

dr-baker wrote:
madmark1974 wrote:Also, I think the Lotus name is due to be dropped again at the end of the year, isn't it?

Dropped for what, I wonder? I haven't heard that rumour before.

Just looked into it a bit more and found this - it appears I was wrong :
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2012/04/06/lotus-2017-losing-title-sponsorship/

I think it was because of the whole Dany Bahar incident and Lotus/Proton not paying that there was talk that the name would be dropped but that doesn't seem to be the case - although the article is a year old and Genii have sold shares to another investor since then, so who knows?

Posted: **28 Jun 2013, 18:40**

Please don't let Lotus change their name. How many name changes will Team Enstone have gone through?

Also, http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/23104904
Finally they have a more logical system to penalise drivers.

Posted: **30 Jun 2013, 22:40**

Since when have McLaren run with a spoon section in the front wing? I only noticed it today

Posted: **01 Jul 2013, 17:46**

Is it ever OK to boo? I know it'll always be there but I dont think its OK. I thought the Canadians booing Vettel was very poor. However, I had no problem with the Brits cheering Vettels car failure. I think its a context thing. I was equally disgusted when some Brits cheered MSCs crash in 1999 but I grinned grudgingly when the Germans cheered and whooped at Hill crashing at Hockenheim in 1996.

I wouldnt have boo'd at Indianapolis because safety was the issue and anyway, Id have been booing the wrong guys, but I may well have vented somewhat at Austria 2002.

Anybody else?

Posted: **01 Jul 2013, 18:11**

Can anyone find a link to the quote where Kimi Raikkonen was asked before his 2012 comeback how difficult it would be to learn DRS and KERS, and Kimi simply stated "It's just two more buttons."

Posted: **01 Jul 2013, 18:12**

CoopsII wrote:Is it ever OK to boo? I know it'll always be there but I dont think its OK. I thought the Canadians booing Vettel was very poor. However, I had no problem with the Brits cheering Vettels car failure. I think its a context thing. I was equally disgusted when some Brits cheered MSCs crash in 1999 but I grinned grudgingly when the Germans cheered and whooped at Hill crashing at Hockenheim in 1996.

I wouldnt have boo'd at Indianapolis because safety was the issue and anyway, Id have been booing the wrong guys, but I may well have vented somewhat at Austria 2002.

Anybody else?

I agree with your sentiment. It's fine to cheer if a driver you don't like is taken out of the race due to a mechanical failure, like what Vettel suffered in Britain. However, cheering following an accident is in terrible taste. Motorsport is inherently dangerous, and we should never treat racing accidents positively, especially just because we dislike the driver involved. Also, booing the victor is very childish on behalf of the fans. Just because your favorite driver didn't win or make the podium doesn't mean you can attack other drivers for doing their job as well as they could.

Posted: **02 Jul 2013, 19:34**

Just thinking about some qualifying sessions which were incredibly close. The Holy Grail of recent times was of course Belgium 2009 where the top 9 were covered by less than half a second. Can anyone think of some others?

Posted: **02 Jul 2013, 19:56**

takagi_for_the_win wrote:Since when have McLaren run with a spoon section in the front wing? I only noticed it today

I'm not entirely sure what exactly you mean by the "spoon section" on the front wing - could you give a slightly better description of the part or perhaps highlight the part on a picture? If it is what I think it is, which is the "r" shaped extension on the end of the upper cascade element, then I believe that was introduced at the Spanish GP.

Posted: **02 Jul 2013, 19:57**

European GP, 1997
Pos - Driver - Time Gap

1. - Jacques Villeneuve - 1:21.072
2. - Michael Schumacher - 1:21.072 +0.000
3. - Heinz-Harald Frentzen - 1:21.072 +0.000
4. - Damon Hill - 1:21.130 +0.058

Posted: **02 Jul 2013, 20:05**

Jocke1 wrote:European GP, 1997
Pos - Driver - Time Gap

1. - Jacques Villeneuve - 1:21.072
2. - Michael Schumacher - 1:21.072 +0.000
3. - Heinz-Harald Frentzen - 1:21.072 +0.000
4. - Damon Hill - 1:21.130 +0.058

The thought of Hill taking pole is a perfect scenario for the What if? thread.

Posted: **02 Jul 2013, 21:47**

Jocke1 wrote:European GP, 1997
Pos - Driver - Time Gap

1. - Jacques Villeneuve - 1:21.072
2. - Michael Schumacher - 1:21.072 +0.000
3. - Heinz-Harald Frentzen - 1:21.072 +0.000
4. - Damon Hill - 1:21.130 +0.058

I remember seeing the Youtube video for this. Great lap from Hill considering the car he had.

Posted: **03 Jul 2013, 13:07**

mario wrote:
takagi_for_the_win wrote:Since when have McLaren run with a spoon section in the front wing? I only noticed it today

I'm not entirely sure what exactly you mean by the "spoon section" on the front wing - could you give a slightly better description of the part or perhaps highlight the part on a picture? If it is what I think it is, which is the "r" shaped extension on the end of the upper cascade element, then I believe that was introduced at the Spanish GP.

When I said spoon section, I meant the curved part of the lower edge of the front wing, as introduced in 2001. However, having looked at high resolution images of the Macca, it would appear it was an optical illusion caused by the thickness of the edges of the front wing being greater than the thickness at the centre.

Posted: **03 Jul 2013, 14:24**

Jocke1 wrote:
lgaquino wrote:This video offers, I think, the closest perspective I've seen so far.
a helmet cam, with Kubica driving [much better positioned than the one used by vettel last year]: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpLjvkh4hQE

Still not sure if it's level with the driver's eye, but it's certainly closer than others. I believe the driver would in fact be able to see the yellow perpendicular lines on the grid slot

HD First Time Ever REAL Eye-Level Camera FORMULA 1 | Lucas di Grassi
http://youtu.be/7-oG5dOlp7M

this_is_what_a_f1_driver_really_sees_while_racing

http://www.gtspirit.com/wp-content/uplo ... racing.jpg

Posted: **03 Jul 2013, 22:11**

Does Thruxton have straights?

Posted: **04 Jul 2013, 08:02**

UgncreativeUsergname wrote:Does Thruxton have straights?

No not really

Posted: **05 Jul 2013, 09:59**

Anyone remember Fiona Leggate in the BTCC? She seemed to drop off the racing radar at the end of 2007 and hasn't been heard of since. Roughly around the same time, a certain driver by the name of Susie Stoddart was racing in the DTM. So I'm thinking, is Susie Stoddart/Wolff not all that she seems? Has anyone seen Fiona and Susie in the same place in public? Maybe Fiona changed her name after her pitiful BTCC performances between 2005-2007 (a few 10th places in the most dominant BTCC car in history, the Vauxhall Astra Coupe...), started racing in the DTM, and was just as bad there...

Posted: **05 Jul 2013, 10:20**

East Londoner wrote:Anyone remember Fiona Leggate in the BTCC? She seemed to drop off the racing radar at the end of 2007 and hasn't been heard of since. Roughly around the same time, a certain driver by the name of Susie Stoddart was racing in the DTM. So I'm thinking, is Susie Stoddart/Wolff not all that she seems? Has anyone seen Fiona and Susie in the same place in public? Maybe Fiona changed her name after her pitiful BTCC performances between 2005-2007 (a few 10th places in the most dominant BTCC car in history, the Vauxhall Astra Coupe...), started racing in the DTM, and was just as bad there...

There is a possibilty they are one and the same. Fiona and Susie.

However, Fiona continued racing after 2007.

If Susie/Fiona is indeed one entity, it is apparently able to be at two places at the same time. :shock:

On May 23rd, 2010:

Fiona Leggate participated in round 5 & 6 of the British Trofeo Abarth 500 Series at Cadwell Park.
Finishing 8th and 7th.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Trofe ... _GB_season

Same day, May 23rd, 2010:

Susie Stoddart-Wolff-Fox-Bear-Whatever participated in round 2 of the DTM Series at Circuit Ricardo Tormo, Valencia.
Finishing 10th.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2010_Deuts ... ers_season

Some serious voodoo shi* going on here....

Posted: **05 Jul 2013, 11:16**

East Londoner wrote:Anyone remember Fiona Leggate in the BTCC? She seemed to drop off the racing radar at the end of 2007 and hasn't been heard of since. Roughly around the same time, a certain driver by the name of Susie Stoddart was racing in the DTM. So I'm thinking, is Susie Stoddart/Wolff not all that she seems? Has anyone seen Fiona and Susie in the same place in public? Maybe Fiona changed her name after her pitiful BTCC performances between 2005-2007 (a few 10th places in the most dominant BTCC car in history, the Vauxhall Astra Coupe...), started racing in the DTM, and was just as bad there...

I remember Fiona Leggate (what a surprise, eh? :lol:

). I believe she went off to have a baby.

And I know who I prefer between Susie and Fiona...

This is not a great photo to promote women's driving skills...

Posted: **05 Jul 2013, 11:25**

dr-baker wrote:And I know who I prefer between Susie and Fiona...

If you prefer Susie then tread carefully. She was a bit pork-meister, a bit of a lardathon, a bit of a chubby chubson when she was younger and when she grows older that may well come back. Unless you're planning on ditching her well before that in which case, PLAYA!

Posted: **05 Jul 2013, 11:29**

CoopsII wrote:
dr-baker wrote:And I know who I prefer between Susie and Fiona...

If you prefer Susie then tread carefully. She was a bit pork-meister, a bit of a lardathon, a bit of a chubby chubson when she was younger and when she grows older that may well come back. Unless you're planning on ditching her well before that in which case, PLAYA!

I'm not letting on. But if Fiona thinks that is a good place to park her car, considering the traffic approaching in the background, then it does not fill me with confidence...

Posted: **05 Jul 2013, 11:56**

dr-baker wrote:But if Fiona thinks that is a good place to park her car, considering the traffic approaching in the background, then it does not fill me with confidence...

I think its called Extreme Dogging. Find a girl, find a car, find a field, then go at it as if your life depends on it because it actually does :lol:

Posted: **05 Jul 2013, 15:05**

East Londoner wrote:Anyone remember Fiona Leggate in the BTCC? She seemed to drop off the racing radar at the end of 2007 and hasn't been heard of since. Roughly around the same time, a certain driver by the name of Susie Stoddart was racing in the DTM. So I'm thinking, is Susie Stoddart/Wolff not all that she seems? Has anyone seen Fiona and Susie in the same place in public? Maybe Fiona changed her name after her pitiful BTCC performances between 2005-2007 (a few 10th places in the most dominant BTCC car in history, the Vauxhall Astra Coupe...), started racing in the DTM, and was just as bad there...

She married Danny Watts and had a kid. I saw her in 2009 at the Portimao round of the European Le Mans Series when I was with Strakka and she was there, supporting Danny Watts. I don't remember if they already had the kid then.

Posted: **06 Jul 2013, 11:22**

CoopsII wrote:
dr-baker wrote:But if Fiona thinks that is a good place to park her car, considering the traffic approaching in the background, then it does not fill me with confidence...

I think its called Extreme Dogging. Find a girl, find a car, find a field, then go at it as if your life depends on it because it actually does

Ah, Baker's Law taken to it's logical extreme :lol:

Posted: **06 Jul 2013, 12:24**

Wizzie wrote:
CoopsII wrote:
dr-baker wrote:But if Fiona thinks that is a good place to park her car, considering the traffic approaching in the background, then it does not fill me with confidence...

I think its called Extreme Dogging. Find a girl, find a car, find a field, then go at it as if your life depends on it because it actually does

Ah, Baker's Law taken to it's logical extreme

Indeed. Hats off to you Coops.

Grand Prix Rejects

Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox

Re: Ponderbox