Dark77 wrote:I don't like how IndyCar is having fewer and fewer oval races.
Road courses > ovals
Dark77 wrote:I don't like how IndyCar is having fewer and fewer oval races.
apple2009 wrote:Dark77 wrote:I don't like how IndyCar is having fewer and fewer oval races.
Road courses > ovals
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:People not dying > ovals
Mike Conway's 2010 crash was a warning.Onxy Wrecked wrote:They didn't learn the NASCAR lesson about keeping the cars on the ground until Wheldon died when NASCAR learned it with the barrel roll outbreak of the early 1990s.
eytl wrote:I agree. Especially when he talks about one's nerves sending signals 111a and 6783 etc. to the brain upon seeing Ericsson's hairdo.
He's got it all wrong. When I see Ericsson and Chilton's hairdos, the only signal going to my brain is 1049.
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:People not dying > ovals
wsrgo wrote:I think Robin Frijns has an attitude problem, and it's getting in the way of his GP2 season, and also making his F1 chances murkier by the minute.
Albert Einstein wrote:Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
Dark77 wrote:Mike Conway's 2010 crash was a warning.Onxy Wrecked wrote:They didn't learn the NASCAR lesson about keeping the cars on the ground until Wheldon died when NASCAR learned it with the barrel roll outbreak of the early 1990s.
Thing is, IndyCar can't get rid of Indy, it just can't, unless it's given to a new series. So it would be a bit odd if in the future Indy was the only oval race on the calender which is where it seems to be heading, and ironic since the IRL was originally ovals only.
Allard Kalff in 1994 wrote:OH!! Schumacher in the wall! Right in front of us, Michael Schumacher is in the wall! He's hit the pitwall, he c... Ah, it's Jos Verstappen.
good_Ralf wrote:Juan Pablo Montoya should get an IndyCar seat next year.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
dr-baker wrote:good_Ralf wrote:Juan Pablo Montoya should get an IndyCar seat next year.
Not unpopular in my opinion...
Dan B wrote:Here is one opinion of mine:
NASCAR should open up to more manufacturers as what is running right now is a bit hypocritical. I remember when the Toyota Camry was first introduced in NASCAR people were bellyaching that there was a Japanese car (despite it being ASSEMBLED in the United States) in an organization that was only for American manufacturers. Now, we have the Holden Commodore racing (as the Chevy SS), which as far as I know, is imported to the US rather than built in the US. If Chevy can get away with running a non US built car, there should be more manufacturer involvement. I would love to see Nissan, for instance, enter Nascar. Conversely, they can switch back to the Impala, which is built in the US but really less suited for Nascar than the Commodore/SS is.
Wallio wrote:I'm sorry but this is one of my big pet peeves. The camry is NOT built in America. it is ASSEMBLED in America. If you bought a model kit that says on it "Made in Hong Kong" and assembled it here, is it Made in America? Of course not. The Camry is no different. Otherwise, I agree with you. NASCAR needs more makes. Hyundai of all people almost came in when they first launched they're 5.0 V8, but nobody wanted to be their team, and they didn't want to run it themselves. VW has also talked about it, but until the engine regs change, IE never, they won't join up.
Dan B wrote:Wallio wrote:I'm sorry but this is one of my big pet peeves. The camry is NOT built in America. it is ASSEMBLED in America. If you bought a model kit that says on it "Made in Hong Kong" and assembled it here, is it Made in America? Of course not. The Camry is no different. Otherwise, I agree with you. NASCAR needs more makes. Hyundai of all people almost came in when they first launched they're 5.0 V8, but nobody wanted to be their team, and they didn't want to run it themselves. VW has also talked about it, but until the engine regs change, IE never, they won't join up.
I'll be honest though; the Camry right now is more "American" than the SS is, even if it's assembled. Which begs to question, why was the SS allowed in the first place?
Don't get me wrong; the SS is a great platform for Chevy's interest in Nascar, but it seems so contradictory to what was previously there.
Wallio wrote:
Simple: GM is bound and determined to sell Holden Commedores here one way or the other. First they had the FauxGTO, then the G8, now the SS and soon..... this monstrousity:
http://www.google.com/imgres?sa=X&rls=c ... =131&ty=57
Ford is scaling back Aussie operations and moving the Mustang Worldwide. GM is continuing to ram the Holden down our throats. One is the number one car maker in America again, the other still is paying back the bailout. Coincidence?
CoopsII wrote:Moto GP is a stupid name. They should either call it something that has the word 'bike' in it or at least use proper words.
Formul 1![]()
Indyca![]()
NASCA
Onxy Wrecked wrote:Wallio wrote:
Simple: GM is bound and determined to sell Holden Commedores here one way or the other. First they had the FauxGTO, then the G8, now the SS and soon..... this monstrousity:
http://www.google.com/imgres?sa=X&rls=c ... =131&ty=57
Ford is scaling back Aussie operations and moving the Mustang Worldwide. GM is continuing to ram the Holden down our throats. One is the number one car maker in America again, the other still is paying back the bailout. Coincidence?
I think the Holden being crammed down our throats is more about keeping chassis development costs to a minimum.
Wallio wrote:Onxy Wrecked wrote:Wallio wrote:
Simple: GM is bound and determined to sell Holden Commedores here one way or the other. First they had the FauxGTO, then the G8, now the SS and soon..... this monstrousity:
http://www.google.com/imgres?sa=X&rls=c ... =131&ty=57
Ford is scaling back Aussie operations and moving the Mustang Worldwide. GM is continuing to ram the Holden down our throats. One is the number one car maker in America again, the other still is paying back the bailout. Coincidence?
I think the Holden being crammed down our throats is more about keeping chassis development costs to a minimum.
Oh I'm sure it is. It still doesn't make it any less of a failure.
giraurd wrote:CoopsII wrote:Moto GP is a stupid name. They should either call it something that has the word 'bike' in it or at least use proper words.
Formul 1![]()
Indyca![]()
NASCA
iirc 'Moto' is a Spanish word for Motorbike. And there is much of spaniardness in MotoGP.
Whole world isn't in English yet.
kevinbotz wrote:Cantonese is a completely nonsensical f*cking alien language masquerading as some grossly bastardised form of Chinese
Gonzo wrote:Wasn't there some sort of communisim in the East part of Germany?
Dan B wrote:Wallio wrote:I'm sorry but this is one of my big pet peeves. The camry is NOT built in America. it is ASSEMBLED in America. If you bought a model kit that says on it "Made in Hong Kong" and assembled it here, is it Made in America? Of course not. The Camry is no different. Otherwise, I agree with you. NASCAR needs more makes. Hyundai of all people almost came in when they first launched they're 5.0 V8, but nobody wanted to be their team, and they didn't want to run it themselves. VW has also talked about it, but until the engine regs change, IE never, they won't join up.
I'll be honest though; the Camry right now is more "American" than the SS is, even if it's assembled. Which begs to question, why was the SS allowed in the first place?
Don't get me wrong; the SS is a great platform for Chevy's interest in Nascar, but it seems so contradictory to what was previously there.
tommykl wrote:giraurd wrote:CoopsII wrote:Moto GP is a stupid name. They should either call it something that has the word 'bike' in it or at least use proper words.
Formul 1![]()
Indyca![]()
NASCA
iirc 'Moto' is a Spanish word for Motorbike. And there is much of spaniardness in MotoGP.
Whole world isn't in English yet.
I'm not sure which one it's named after, but "Moto" is also the diminutive form of the word "motorbike" (or "motocyclette") in French...
Albert Einstein wrote:Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
tommykl wrote:giraurd wrote:CoopsII wrote:Moto GP is a stupid name. They should either call it something that has the word 'bike' in it or at least use proper words.
Formul 1![]()
Indyca![]()
NASCA
iirc 'Moto' is a Spanish word for Motorbike. And there is much of spaniardness in MotoGP.
Whole world isn't in English yet.
I'm not sure which one it's named after, but "Moto" is also the diminutive form of the word "motorbike" (or "motocyclette") in French...
giraurd wrote:CoopsII wrote:Moto GP is a stupid name. They should either call it something that has the word 'bike' in it or at least use proper words.
Formul 1![]()
Indyca![]()
NASCA
iirc 'Moto' is a Spanish word for Motorbike. And there is much of spaniardness in MotoGP.
Whole world isn't in English yet.
Albert Einstein wrote:Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the universe.
go_Rubens wrote:And the whole world will never be English.
Wallio wrote:I don't give a Bathplug about Formula E.
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:Wallio wrote:I don't give a Bathplug about Formula E.
We'll have to wait a year for the first race to conclusively decide whether it's to be cared about.
Mexicola wrote:shinji wrote:Mexicola wrote: I'd rather listen to a dog lick its balls. Each to their own, I guess.
Does listening to a dog licking its balls get you excited?
That's between me and my internet service provider.
roblomas52 wrote:UgncreativeUsergname wrote:Wallio wrote:I don't give a Bathplug about Formula E.
We'll have to wait a year for the first race to conclusively decide whether it's to be cared about.
i belive that the fatal flaw with the series is that the costs will be to high with each drive needing 2 cars for just the race.
Dark77 wrote:WTCC isn't the worst thing ever.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
Dark77 wrote:WTCC isn't the worst thing ever.
Dark77 wrote:WTCC isn't the worst thing ever.
Onxy Wrecked wrote:Dark77 wrote:WTCC isn't the worst thing ever.
As the NASCAR chase format has led to no fewer than four allegations of cheating at Richmond.
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
Wallio wrote:Onxy Wrecked wrote:Dark77 wrote:WTCC isn't the worst thing ever.
As the NASCAR chase format has led to no fewer than four allegations of cheating at Richmond.
Which is sad, because while all four allegations are true, none of them are cheating. Which leads me to another very unpopular opinion:
There's not a damn thing wrong with team orders in any sport.
Dark77 wrote:Jeff Smith deserves to win a BTCC race.
Dark77 wrote:Jeff Smith deserves to win a BTCC race.