Page 10 of 16

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 10 Nov 2016, 16:55
by Barbazza
Ocon has absolutely nothing in F1 to deserve that Force India seat, but we all know why it's happened. I just hope that Ericsson stays at Sauber - he deserves to be there next year much more than Nasr does.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 10 Nov 2016, 17:08
by Ataxia
Barbazza wrote:Ocon has absolutely nothing in F1 to deserve that Force India seat, but we all know why it's happened. I just hope that Ericsson stays at Sauber - he deserves to be there next year much more than Nasr does.


Force India have worked with both Wehrlein and Ocon, and have their respective datasets. Ocon's got bags of talent, we can see that from his junior category results, and although he's aided by Mercedes, that won't have been the key factor.

Ericsson and Nasr will both most likely stay at Sauber, and Manor will presumably keep Wehrlein and partner him with someone from GP2; in theory, any one of Giovinazzi, Sirotkin or King could make it.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 10 Nov 2016, 17:34
by andrew
Ataxia wrote:
Barbazza wrote:Ocon has absolutely nothing in F1 to deserve that Force India seat, but we all know why it's happened. I just hope that Ericsson stays at Sauber - he deserves to be there next year much more than Nasr does.


Force India have worked with both Wehrlein and Ocon, and have their respective datasets. Ocon's got bags of talent, we can see that from his junior category results, and although he's aided by Mercedes, that won't have been the key factor.

Ericsson and Nasr will both most likely stay at Sauber, and Manor will presumably keep Wehrlein and partner him with someone from GP2; in theory, any one of Giovinazzi, Sirotkin or King could make it.


Ocon has been thrown in the deep end at Manor. The car was built for Rio Haryanto not ocon, there is a considerable height difference between the two Ocon had to force his way into the car for the first few races. It is a bit like squeezing Mike and sulley from monsters inc into the same car.

Ocon has improved slightly since Beglium and has done very well in feeder catagoires, besting the demigod that is Max Verstappen and beating Luca Ghiotto to the GP3 title. You don't get onto the Mercedes young diver programme without some talent. Furthermore Wehrlien had all of testing and 10 or so races to get used to the car, something Ocon did not get, having a practice session in a Renualt and a test in a Mercedes.

To you're point Ataxia, does King have the suffient superlicence points to race in f1? Giovanzzi will if he wins gp2 and assumedly Sirotkin will have the points as well, not that I've heard him linked with the Manor drive,

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 10 Nov 2016, 22:39
by AustralianStig
IIRC they didn't even have a proper seat for Ocon until about his third race...

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 10 Nov 2016, 23:44
by RonDenisDeletraz
Ocon hasn't really impressed me in F1 so far, but he does have a hugely impressive junior record, will be interesting to see how he goes

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 12 Nov 2016, 14:49
by Londoner
Gutierrez throws Haas under the bus.

Carry on Esteban, you're effectively making yourself unemployable in the F1 paddock with comments like this. I will be amazed if he's still in F1 for 2017, given apparently he thoroughly burnt his bridges with Sauber in 2014. Manor is his last hope, and even then I believe they'd rather try and get Haryanto back into the car for 2017. As slow as Rio is, at least he doesn't appear to be arrogant and carry a sense of entitlement like Gutierrez does.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 12 Nov 2016, 19:42
by Samster
According to Autosport, Manor has a shortlist of 4 drivers. Wehrlein, Nasr, Gutierrez and Haryanto. Nasr is said to prefer Sauber so out of those I'm hoping for a return to Wehrlein and Haryanto again.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 12 Nov 2016, 21:54
by mario
Samster wrote:According to Autosport, Manor has a shortlist of 4 drivers. Wehrlein, Nasr, Gutierrez and Haryanto. Nasr is said to prefer Sauber so out of those I'm hoping for a return to Wehrlein and Haryanto again.

If I recall rightly, McNish mentioned in the BBC's radio coverage of the practise sessions that most in the paddock expect that Sauber will keep Nasr and Ericsson for 2017.

That would seem to suggest that the most likely candidates are Wehrlein, Gutierrez and Haryanto - as East Londoner says though, Gutierrez's rather abrasive and entitled attitude is unlikely to endear him to Manor, and the way that Gutierrez was complaining in that article feels a bit like he knows he is on his way out of the sport anyway.

Ataxia wrote:
Barbazza wrote:Ocon has absolutely nothing in F1 to deserve that Force India seat, but we all know why it's happened. I just hope that Ericsson stays at Sauber - he deserves to be there next year much more than Nasr does.


Force India have worked with both Wehrlein and Ocon, and have their respective datasets. Ocon's got bags of talent, we can see that from his junior category results, and although he's aided by Mercedes, that won't have been the key factor.

Ericsson and Nasr will both most likely stay at Sauber, and Manor will presumably keep Wehrlein and partner him with someone from GP2; in theory, any one of Giovinazzi, Sirotkin or King could make it.

Furthermore, there are some whispers from those who worked with him in DTM that suggest that, behind the scenes, Wehrlein is a very difficult driver to work with.

There were hints of that in one practise session where, having spun the car, he was told by his engineers to shut the engine off to stop the car overheating - Wehrlein's response was to start arguing with the team, asking for more time to try and turn the car around even after he'd been told about 5 times to shut the engine off as the water temperature started to hit critical levels.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 13 Nov 2016, 18:05
by Dj_bereta
According with Brazilian tv coverage, Sette Câmara is going to quit Red Bull Young driver programme at the end of the year.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 16 Nov 2016, 20:28
by Rob Dylan
In a continuation of the subject of money problems:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/127140/force-india-manor-ask-for-advanced-payment

While I am not worried by Force India - they seem to have a good package and stability that can get them through years of little money - I am somewhat by Manor. While the former will receive serious payment from FOM with its fourth place anyway, Manor aren't in so comfortable a position in terms of car performance or stability. Those Mercedes engines can't be cheap.

Then again, maybe I'm just paranoid and overreacting. I sure hope I am.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 17 Nov 2016, 23:34
by Waris
Rob Dylan wrote:In a continuation of the subject of money problems:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/127140/force-india-manor-ask-for-advanced-payment

While I am not worried by Force India - they seem to have a good package and stability that can get them through years of little money - I am somewhat by Manor. While the former will receive serious payment from FOM with its fourth place anyway, Manor aren't in so comfortable a position in terms of car performance or stability. Those Mercedes engines can't be cheap.

Then again, maybe I'm just paranoid and overreacting. I sure hope I am.


I was under the impression they got the engines for free in exchange for putting Wehrlein in the car?

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 02:06
by Dj_bereta
Breaking rumor. According with some Brazilian sources (Globo, Folha de São Paulo and others), Banco do Brasil is leaving Sauber and F1 as well. Nasr's seat at Sauber is in danger now.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 15:03
by Rob Dylan
Dj_bereta wrote:Breaking rumor. According with some Brazilian sources (Globo, Folha de São Paulo and others), Banco do Brasil is leaving Sauber and F1 as well. Nasr's seat at Sauber is in danger now.

He will be terribly, terribly missed.
*Rob Dylan looks up Felipe Nasr's F1 career results*
Wait a second, this guy's not even a reject!
Image
Let's sacrifice him to our God!

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 20 Nov 2016, 19:21
by dr-baker
Rob Dylan wrote:
Wait a second, this guy's not even a reject!
Image
Let's sacrifice him to our God!

Does HWNSNBM accept sacrifices?

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 21 Nov 2016, 07:29
by UncreativeUsername37
dr-baker wrote:
Rob Dylan wrote:
Wait a second, this guy's not even a reject!
Image
Let's sacrifice him to our God!

Does HWNSNBM accept sacrifices?

Let's find out!

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 21 Nov 2016, 12:31
by madmark1974
Dj_bereta wrote:Breaking rumor. According with some Brazilian sources (Globo, Folha de São Paulo and others), Banco do Brasil is leaving Sauber and F1 as well. Nasr's seat at Sauber is in danger now.


Ericsson at least is staying ... http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/formula1/38050061

Sauber said they will announce their second driver for 2017 in due course.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 22 Nov 2016, 16:10
by Rob Dylan
And on that note...
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/127221/wehrlein-frontrunner-for-sauber-second-seat

An Ericsson/Wehrlein Sauber line-up for 2017?

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 22 Nov 2016, 18:40
by CaptainGetz12
Rob Dylan wrote:And on that note...
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/127221/wehrlein-frontrunner-for-sauber-second-seat

An Ericsson/Wehrlein Sauber line-up for 2017?


Can I bet them getting Mercedes engines in 2017 or 2018?

Though if Pascal does leave that could spell trouble for Manor if they want to keep their Mercedes powerplants :?

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 22 Nov 2016, 19:31
by Waris
I would hate to see Nasr out. He deserves to be in F1 on talent alone, plus it would be very bad for F1 in Brazil if there were no Brazilians in F1. (I'm not Brazilian, but I have a bit of a soft spot for them.)

Maybe Manor will take him on, but then again I suppose they would also need the Banco do Brasil money.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 22 Nov 2016, 21:53
by andrew
Ericsson keeping his seat comes as no shock really given his mate owns the team. Is it me, or would longbow f1 or longbow racing be an epic team name?

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 22 Nov 2016, 22:05
by Ataxia
andrew wrote:Ericsson keeping his seat comes as no shock really given his mate owns the team. Is it me, or would longbow f1 or longbow racing be an epic team name?


They'd certainly shine if there was ever a race in Agincourt...

It's not 100% proven that Ericsson's backers own the team; there are plenty of things to suggest that they're involved, but they're keeping the ownership structure very much under wraps. It's a curious move to actively shun the limelight, but there's far more to F1 sponsorship/ownership setups than just brand exposure. Perhaps Tetra Pak (who are rumoured to be involved) are more interested in working with Sauber for case study development, or something to that effect.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 22 Nov 2016, 22:08
by andrew
Ataxia wrote:
andrew wrote:Ericsson keeping his seat comes as no shock really given his mate owns the team. Is it me, or would longbow f1 or longbow racing be an epic team name?


They'd certainly shine if there was ever a race in Agincourt...

.

That has just made my day.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 25 Nov 2016, 21:17
by Londoner

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 25 Nov 2016, 22:21
by Nuppiz

...Yeah, I think I'll hold firm on my decision that this Sunday will be the last F1 race I'll be watching in a long time.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 25 Nov 2016, 23:11
by Dj_bereta
I'm going to be honest: I liked it.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 25 Nov 2016, 23:38
by Bobby Doorknobs
Nuppiz wrote:

...Yeah, I think I'll hold firm on my decision that this Sunday will be the last F1 race I'll be watching in a long time.

Image

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 09:43
by Aerond


I'm happy with the idea.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 11:52
by solarcold
Aerond wrote:


I'm happy with the idea.


So am I.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 12:08
by This Could Be You
Erm... In other news, Manor has a new, as yet unnamed investor for 2017, hopefully saving them from financial issues caused by the loss of prize money

On the other hand, Nasr has lost Banco do Brazil sponsorship, meaning Sauber will be back to grey (as I predicted :P ) and Wehrlein has more of a chance of replacing him, which could be bad news for the Manor Mercedes deal.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 18:59
by IceG
It might be a better bet for Wehrlein to stay at Manor than go to Sauber. I'd always liked Sauber until the Monisha era; she seems to make some very odd decisions around finance and driver contracts.

Manor with new investors and a Merc engine sounds far more attractive than Sauber on the edge of financial doom with last years Ferrari engine.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 26 Nov 2016, 19:07
by solarcold
IceG wrote:It might be a better bet for Wehrlein to stay at Manor than go to Sauber. I'd always liked Sauber until the Monisha era; she seems to make some very odd decisions around finance and driver contracts.

Manor with new investors and a Merc engine sounds far more attractive than Sauber on the edge of financial doom with last years Ferrari engine.


Agree 100%. This Sauber is not Sauber I used to like. I root for Pascal to stay.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 00:04
by AndreaModa
Can someone explain the hand-wringing over standing starts after safety cars? Why is it bad exactly?

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 00:11
by mario
solarcold wrote:
IceG wrote:It might be a better bet for Wehrlein to stay at Manor than go to Sauber. I'd always liked Sauber until the Monisha era; she seems to make some very odd decisions around finance and driver contracts.

Manor with new investors and a Merc engine sounds far more attractive than Sauber on the edge of financial doom with last years Ferrari engine.


Agree 100%. This Sauber is not Sauber I used to like. I root for Pascal to stay.

I do have to agree that the team hasn't been quite the same since Kaltenborn took the helm, although a few of the issues which have come to the fore under her tenure had been brewing for a while.

The cash flow issues have been a major problem for years - for example, for about the past three or four years, there have been frequent rumours about Ferrari coming close to cutting off engine supplies to the team because they've not been paid. To a certain extent, some of those financial issues were effectively handed over by Peter Sauber into Kaltenborn's lap, so she was already starting from a difficult position.

However, even though she has had something of a weak hand to work with, I feel that she has played it rather poorly, with the van der Garde affair being perhaps the most egregious example. Even if you take the position that some have, which is that it was an act of necessary ruthlessness to help the teams survive, then she failed to achieve her objectives - between the legal fees and the compensation to van der Garde, the whole incident reportedly ended up costing Sauber money and caused a major cash flow crisis, whilst simultaneously doing major damage to their reputation. Peter Sauber had a few lean years of his own, but he still somehow managed to keep a positive vibe about the team - something that Kaltenborn just doesn't seem to have achieved, and ultimately has made the team hard to like in a number of ways.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 14:56
by UncreativeUsername37
AndreaModa wrote:Can someone explain the hand-wringing over standing starts after safety cars? Why is it bad exactly?

Artificial way to get more action. Plus having something as variable as a start makes the already unfair bunching of the field even worse.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 15:08
by Nuppiz
AndreaModa wrote:Can someone explain the hand-wringing over standing starts after safety cars? Why is it bad exactly?

The motorsport.com article linked in this topic earlier listed a number of flaws in mid-race standing restarts. One of the major problems is the grip difference between each side of the grid, either due to the presence of tyre marbles (in a dry race) or more water (in a wet race). So basically, one half of the drivers would have a major disadvantage in the restart.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 27 Nov 2016, 21:13
by Waris
I'll bet you it will happen once or twice and then it'll be abandoned again, just like with the new qualifying format this year (does anyone even remember that? I had long forgotten until I thought of it just now writing this).

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 02 Dec 2016, 13:38
by rachel1990
So I thought most of the silly season was over- Nico Rosberg has just opened a prime seat in f1!! Who will get the seat?

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 02 Dec 2016, 13:43
by GwilymJJames
Never has a situation more obviously called for Nick Heidfeld.

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 02 Dec 2016, 13:47
by IceG
Well Mercedes need a top class driver to ensure that they beat Ferrari/Red Bull and possibly even Mclaren. To the extent thay might even buy out some top-notch contracts. They also need some long-term commitment as Hamilton will start to look around if the Mercs struggle next year.

I can't see Ricciardo or Verstappen moving (new rules, Newey) or Raikkonen (too close to retirement) but Vettel might jump ship.

Otherwise its Sainz or possibly Bottas (Williams always being willing to sell a driver rather than succeed).

But realistically I think we are seeing Gutierrez chance

Re: The 2017 Silly Season thread

Posted: 02 Dec 2016, 13:49
by CoopsII
rachel1990 wrote:So I thought most of the silly season was over- Nico Rosberg has just opened a prime seat in f1!! Who will get the seat?

Image

Or

Image