Re: Your Reject of the Race - Great Britain
Posted: 22 Jun 2009, 17:54
My ROTR is whoever the man on Kazuki's front wheel is as for the second race in a row, his points finishes were ruined by a bungled pitstop. Poor guy.
A tribute to the heroic failures of Grand Prix racing
https://ftp.gprejects.com/forum/
tc3j3r wrote:Ben Gilbert wrote: Now, it's just fast, with no real overtaking points, and as a result, there has only been one good race at Silverstone for over a decade, and it doesn't really count as it was affected by rain.
2003 was a dry race, and also one of the best races of this decade...
Ben Gilbert wrote:tc3j3r wrote:Ben Gilbert wrote: Now, it's just fast, with no real overtaking points, and as a result, there has only been one good race at Silverstone for over a decade, and it doesn't really count as it was affected by rain.
2003 was a dry race, and also one of the best races of this decade...
Forgot about that. I will agree, that was a fantastic race, but..
It was only made interesting because of a lunatic running down Hangar Straight, so again, it joins the wet races as not really counting. Races should not have to have monsoons to be interesting, or doom-mongerers sprinting down the track, but thanks to aerodynamic progress, it's what excitment has been reduced to.
It was a fantastic race, I was there that day. But still all the overtaking took place at Abbey. If you were watching elsewhere on the circuit it was still a high speed procession.