Re: Anti-spam moderators!
Posted: 03 Jan 2012, 15:45
East Londoner wrote:Mr Moderators, please can you merge the new shoe spam thread with the epic one?
I have put quotes from spam thread in shoe spam thread.
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
A tribute to the heroic failures of Grand Prix racing
https://ftp.gprejects.com/forum/
East Londoner wrote:Mr Moderators, please can you merge the new shoe spam thread with the epic one?
simonracer wrote:Put that spambot on the gallows
He deserves to die
He spammed his way to infamy
By talking about drugs, communism and religion
And the witch couldn't make it make sense!
He did 6 successive spam posts, a crime above all others
So put the spammer on the gallows!
He doesn't deserve a trial!
He doesn't deserve to be allowed mercy!
He does deserve to die!
Let him rot, as an example to all!
Let the dogs rip out his wretched heart!
Veftlislentee, a name that will forever live in infamy!
It's a disgrace to the forum, and to HWNSBM
HE DESERVES TO DIE
East Londoner wrote:Spammer that somehow managed to misspell a two-letter word in the IndyCar thread![]()
http://www.f1rejects.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3925&start=960#p132824
redbulljack14 wrote:East Londoner wrote:Spammer that somehow managed to misspell a two-letter word in the IndyCar thread![]()
http://www.f1rejects.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3925&start=960#p132824
Hie
What kind of person can't spell hi?
Phoenix wrote:redbulljack14 wrote:East Londoner wrote:Spammer that somehow managed to misspell a two-letter word in the IndyCar thread![]()
http://www.f1rejects.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=3925&start=960#p132824
Hie
What kind of person can't spell hi?
I doe.
Whaet's your proeblem?
redbulljack14 wrote:Phoenix wrote:redbulljack14 wrote:Hie
What kind of person can't spell hi?
I doe.
Whaet's your proeblem?
Is that Phoenglish?
East Londoner wrote:ALERT ALERT ALERT!!! Veftlislentee has gone berserk!![]()
![]()
![]()
BaconLettuceNinja wrote:Yeah, that was pretty mental last night...has he/it been blocked now?
mario wrote:BaconLettuceNinja wrote:Yeah, that was pretty mental last night...has he/it been blocked now?
At the moment I am afraid that spam bot is one of a number that is still on the members list.
East Londoner wrote:mario wrote:BaconLettuceNinja wrote:Yeah, that was pretty mental last night...has he/it been blocked now?
At the moment I am afraid that spam bot is one of a number that is still on the members list.
Haven't the Australian overlords of this site given you and Phoenix the keys to the banhammer yet?
East Londoner wrote:mario wrote:BaconLettuceNinja wrote:Yeah, that was pretty mental last night...has he/it been blocked now?
At the moment I am afraid that spam bot is one of a number that is still on the members list.
Haven't the Australian overlords of this site given you and Phoenix the keys to the banhammer yet?
DanielPT wrote:I agree that, after a year proving themselves as Moderator Knights, both mario and Phoenix now should be graced with a promotion to Master Moderators learning a new power in the process: Ban spam bots.
mario wrote:DanielPT wrote:I agree that, after a year proving themselves as Moderator Knights, both mario and Phoenix now should be graced with a promotion to Master Moderators learning a new power in the process: Ban spam bots.
I have a strong suspicion that if that were to happen, and both Phoenix and I set to work, the number of members that this forum officially has might drop sharply (as I type the very latest member is another spam bot, and a quick flick through the member list suggests that there are a sizeable number of spam bots out there).
dr-baker wrote:mario wrote:DanielPT wrote:I agree that, after a year proving themselves as Moderator Knights, both mario and Phoenix now should be graced with a promotion to Master Moderators learning a new power in the process: Ban spam bots.
I have a strong suspicion that if that were to happen, and both Phoenix and I set to work, the number of members that this forum officially has might drop sharply (as I type the very latest member is another spam bot, and a quick flick through the member list suggests that there are a sizeable number of spam bots out there).
To be honest, that won't be any big deal - there are a great number of registered users who have never posted, and it would reduce the possibility of random spam. And how many genuine people really sign up but then never post?
Wizzie wrote:dr-baker wrote:mario wrote:I have a strong suspicion that if that were to happen, and both Phoenix and I set to work, the number of members that this forum officially has might drop sharply (as I type the very latest member is another spam bot, and a quick flick through the member list suggests that there are a sizeable number of spam bots out there).
To be honest, that won't be any big deal - there are a great number of registered users who have never posted, and it would reduce the possibility of random spam. And how many genuine people really sign up but then never post?
But we need those members to prop up the numbers![]()
And speaking of numbers, this is post 6000 for me
mario wrote:DanielPT wrote:I agree that, after a year proving themselves as Moderator Knights, both mario and Phoenix now should be graced with a promotion to Master Moderators learning a new power in the process: Ban spam bots.
I have a strong suspicion that if that were to happen, and both Phoenix and I set to work, the number of members that this forum officially has might drop sharply (as I type the very latest member is another spam bot, and a quick flick through the member list suggests that there are a sizeable number of spam bots out there).
Phoenix wrote:mario wrote:DanielPT wrote:I agree that, after a year proving themselves as Moderator Knights, both mario and Phoenix now should be graced with a promotion to Master Moderators learning a new power in the process: Ban spam bots.
I have a strong suspicion that if that were to happen, and both Phoenix and I set to work, the number of members that this forum officially has might drop sharply (as I type the very latest member is another spam bot, and a quick flick through the member list suggests that there are a sizeable number of spam bots out there).
And, in the basis of that, I prefer things as they are right now. Deleting whatever spam that might appear is far better than having to deal with "suspicious" new members.
East Londoner wrote:I'm loving the dreadful use of Google Translate that this new wave of spambots appear to be doing to get their posts into English
mario wrote:East Londoner wrote:I'm loving the dreadful use of Google Translate that this new wave of spambots appear to be doing to get their posts into English
They've also been stepping up their attacks recently by the looks of things - there have been a few waves of spam coming in over the past few days, and they seem to be coming in clusters now.
East Londoner wrote:The spammers appear to be striking around 10/11 o'clock PM GMT every day, which it currently is at the moment. I await with interest to see the latest botched Google Translate posts from one of these inept contraptions
East Londoner wrote:Blimey, a more intellegent spammer than we've seen in recent weeks. It even tried to join the F1RWRS of all things!![]()
![]()
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4789#p138964
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4549&start=1740#p138963
EDIT: This spambot is Indian. Viresh was Indian. Could this be the second coming of Viresh?
mario wrote:East Londoner wrote:Blimey, a more intellegent spammer than we've seen in recent weeks. It even tried to join the F1RWRS of all things!![]()
![]()
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4789#p138964
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4549&start=1740#p138963
EDIT: This spambot is Indian. Viresh was Indian. Could this be the second coming of Viresh?
I guess that there is some logic in that, in as much as that part of the forum does still get a fair amount of traffic. Thanks for pointing out that second post - I'd seen and deleted the first post, but hadn't stopped the second until then.
Wizzie wrote:mario wrote:East Londoner wrote:Blimey, a more intellegent spammer than we've seen in recent weeks. It even tried to join the F1RWRS of all things!![]()
![]()
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4789#p138964
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4549&start=1740#p138963
EDIT: This spambot is Indian. Viresh was Indian. Could this be the second coming of Viresh?
I guess that there is some logic in that, in as much as that part of the forum does still get a fair amount of traffic. Thanks for pointing out that second post - I'd seen and deleted the first post, but hadn't stopped the second until then.
You should venture over to McCarthy land more often Mario
DanielPT wrote:I am afraid that mario fears for what may happen to him if he ventures into the wild like that!
mario wrote:Wizzie's description, though, of "McCarthy land" almost makes it sound more like 1950's America when McCarthyism was in full swing (at least that was the phrase which came to mind for some reason).
East Londoner wrote:Blimey, a more intellegent spammer than we've seen in recent weeks. It even tried to join the F1RWRS of all things!![]()
![]()
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4789#p138964
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=4549&start=1740#p138963
EDIT: This spambot is Indian. Viresh was Indian. Could this be the second coming of Viresh?
mario wrote:DanielPT wrote:I am afraid that mario fears for what may happen to him if he ventures into the wild like that!
Whilst I'm hardly adverse to sim racing in itself and do occasionally take a look into the PMMR, it's just that generally I find it a little confusing to keep track of things in there. Wizzie's description, though, of "McCarthy land" almost makes it sound more like 1950's America when McCarthyism was in full swing (at least that was the phrase which came to mind for some reason).
East Londoner wrote:There's a reactivated spambot by the name of 'johnmax', that's currently online at this time. (8:35 AM BST). We should probably prepare ourself for a barrage of spam, Veftlistlentee style.