noiceinmydrink wrote: ↑29 Jan 2025, 15:08
Wallio wrote: ↑29 Jan 2025, 15:00
Perhaps the UK had a similar version of the regs the US adopted not long after? In the US, only one entity could be sponsored by a cigarette brand. Its why famously Ferrari had to drop their Marlboro logos, while "Marlboro Team Penske" did not. Winston went from sponsoring NASCAR, NHRA, and IHRA, to just NASCAR.
Ah right, that makes sense then - I had no idea that was a thing even in the US!
It is also possible that some of those modifications were made to permit the races to be broadcast in other countries - in 1992 and 1993, French anti-tobacco advertising legislation threatened to prevent Formula 1 from broadcasting any races in France, and it seems that, in late 1992, a French court imposed a fine on Williams and threatened to seize their equipment if they entered the country again (which resulted in the FIA initially striking the French GP off the 1993 calendar). It seems that the FFSA eventually managed to strike a deal with the French government that allowed some tobacco advertising to continue in the short term, provided that it was phased out by the end of 1995.
As an aside, whilst trying to find an answer to it, I did also stumble across an extract of a debate in the House of Lords from 1997 when the UK initially passed an exemption allowing Formula 1 to continue with tobacco advertising (
https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hans ... motorsport). It is rather interesting to see how the members there were complaining that it was necessary for tobacco advertising to be kept up in order to keep the UK motorsport sector going (this being around the time that Ecclestone was also donating money to the government, followed by them giving Formula 1 an exemption to tobacco advertising).