DanielPT wrote:As for the rest of your post you are pretty much spot on, at least for me. But how do you make the cars more hard to drive with all the technology? You might make them more powerful but you would be compromising safety at some degree.
I was making the point of leaving the cars alone. They are fine. Hence I said "none of this Group B nonsense" - no need for any hypercar power or things like this.
Right now the manufacturers enter small hatchbacks because it's what they sell. The large powerful saloons (like the Lancer and Impreza) are quickly becoming obsolete in the current automotive climate, so we can't pretend that we can just "go back to the old days" and bring back a form factor that isn't relevant. No longer are car makers interested in promoting a product in motorsport that is the same car you can buy on the forecourt. It's about promoting brand values.
Even if in the grand scheme of things it does absolutely nothing for performance, on the 'speed' type rallies, mandating aero kit that is half-way towards Pikes Peak appearance will help draw the crowd in. And then of course you have the standard kind of Safari-spec cars you had back in the day for the endurance events. The series needs to amplify the uniqueness of each individual event.
Of course none of this necessarily makes the action any better. But if it does enough to draw the casual viewer in, it gives more manufacturers more reason to promote their product on the WRC platform, and thus would improve the base quality of the series as a whole. More manufacturers putting money into the sport, the stakes go higher, there is more demand to train and fine-tune junior drivers into world class competitors of the future. Right now young prospects seem to have to fend for themselves. It's not a healthy climate.