Klon wrote:mario wrote:That said, an engine deal with HRT will depend on a waiver from the FIA allowing the deal, since the regulations limit the manufacturers to supplying just four teams, including their own team.
Weren't there some admittedly silly rumours regarding Renault wishing to end the cooperation with Renault F1? If Bahar now gets his way and the team actually becomes Lotus, these rumours might get just a little bit more substance, therefore Lotus Cars could just be the saviour Cosworth needs. Although I would not bet a single cent on it, it would be that kind of irony I love.
Interestingly, Boullier has confirmed in a recent interview that Cosworth have already contacted the Renault team with an eye to replacing Renault as the engine deal between Genii and Renault Sport is due to expire soon - though it seems that Boullier wants to continue with Renault engines instead of gambling on a switch to Cosworth.
Boullier has also said his team is on the verge of extending its engine partnership with Renault, despite having been linked with Cosworth earlier this year.
"We are very close, but I cannot tell you more," he said. "We have a historical relationship, we have a close technical relationship and there is [oil sponsor] Total mixed in the middle of this, so there are some commercial reasons why we should stick with Renault."
When asked about the Cosworth situation, Boullier said: "You always have to have a B-plan and a C-plan, and yes we have been approached by Cosworth, because they have lost customers. They are talking to everyone in the pitlane I guess, or nearly everybody, but there are no plans so far."
Back to HRT, and the possibility of an engine deal with Renault - were that to happen, it seems that they would have to arrange a deal with Boullier as well as Renault Sport and Magnetti Marelli:
Boullier also suggested that a KERS technology share plan being put together between all the Renault-powered teams was dependent on his outfit.
"We own some of the IP on the KERS because we have designed it. The know-how is in Enstone, and we are discussing transferring it all together to make the best overall unit."
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/94571kostas22 wrote:Honda screwing everything over was their management structure, everything that happened in Brackley had to be checked over and approved by management in Tochigi. Basically they fell for an all too common mistake of not giving subordinates enough control. I believe Toyota did the same as well, HQ in Japan was always making decisions while disregarding what was going on in Cologne. Compare this to Ferrari - the F1 team and the car manufacturing arms of the business are still located within about a mile of each other. They don't have a bunch of suits looking at some financial and performance data from a 78th floor executive office making the biggest decisons for them.
Although,regarding Toyota, I'd probably say that was more down to their very conservative approach, they didn't like taking risks with their design or strategy or their drivers or...well, anything.
Certainly, as far as Toyota was concerned, their overly cautious approach seems to have been one of the main things that hindered them, coupled to a somewhat insular design team. After all, one of the few years in which they had a more radical design, which was their 2009 challenger that was amongst one of the few cars to feature an early DDD, was due to the fact that a new designer had brought the idea of a DDD from Super Aguri to Toyota.
That said, Toyota's Motorsport Group wasn't lacking in talent or resources - though the F1 team is long gone, the site in Cologne is still very active as Toyota has turned their former racing team into a consultancy group in effect, offering their facilities and staff to other teams with considerable success - so much so that, when Ferrari hit problems earlier this year with their wind tunnel, it was to Toyota's facilities (which still has one of the most sophisticated wind tunnels out of the current and former teams available for use) that they turned to validate their designs. McLaren, too, turned to Toyota's facilities in 2010 when their own resources were a little stretched between work on their 2011 can and development of the 2010 car - so, if nothing else, as a consultant Toyota seems to be having more success than they had on the track in their own right.