Page 1 of 1
Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 10:24
by CarlosFerreira
For all the talks of mergers between Campos, USF1 and Stefan, in different combinations, here's the thread that asks what good could come of it. Let's see:
- Stefan owns 1 (maybe 2?) underdeveloped prototype, with an engine spec that hasn't been tested for the new regs; they may or may not have a bit of money (but no sponsors), and are renting a couple of rooms in TTE's shed in Cologne. They've started an engine but haven't turned a wheel - belatedly because none were supplied by Bridgestone. Some of Toyota's old team are working with them (?).
- Campos owns an entry to the 2010 Championship, has a contract with Dallara for chassis, Cossie for engines and Bridgestone for tyres - but less money than me, so they have none yet. They have another great asset, a Brazilian driver named Senna. We've heard they have an empty shed somewhere. They probably have some staff, and the place has recently been taken by storm by Colin Kolles, of all people.
- USF1 has the shards of an impact-destroyed nose, a dummy chassis tub, and contracts with Cossie and Bridgestone. They also have a workforce who apparently wasn't paid this month, a shed in NASCAR land, contracts with pay drivers, and a nice picture of Peter Windsor, Jose Maria Lopez and Argentina's President, Ms Kirchner, to place over the mantelpiece.
Seriously - in whose book does it say that, even if you got the three of them together in a single team, you would have a serious contender for Bahrain - in 3 weeks' time?
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 10:42
by TomWazzleshaw
I would say the best combo of those 3 teams would be:
From Stefan:
Toyota chassis as a baseline
Toyota Engine (Maybe the Cosworth is better but atleast this engine is proven)
Cologne Facilities
Kazuki Nakajima
The money left behind from Toyota
Staff from Toyota
From Campos Meta:
Contract with Dallara (Might help with development of 2010 can and build a car for them beyond then)
2010 Entry (Obviously)
Bruno Senna (In the other race seat beside Nakajima)
Colin Kolles (Unike Zoran or Peter he has experience running a team (But not a very good one)
From USF1:
Jose Maria Lopez (As a paying test driver)
Youtube Sponsorship
Stefan Meta F1... it could work
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 10:48
by CarlosFerreira
Wizzie wrote:Stefan Meta F1... it could work
![Mr. Green :mrgreen:](./images/smilies/icon_mrgreen.gif)
Could be a cracker. The
Ferrari people, however, seem to disagree:
The Horse Whisperer - For whom the bell tolls
Maranello, 22nd February - Only less than three weeks to go until the ultimate form of motor sport, the Formula 1 World Championship, gets underway, while celebrating its sixtieth birthday this year. For many of the teams, this coming week is a crucial one, as the bell rings to signal the final lap, with the last test session getting underway in Barcelona. It is one last chance to run the cars on track, to push reliability to the limit and to try and find some performance. That’s the situation for many teams but not for all of them. Of the thirteen teams who signed up, or were induced to sign up, for this year’s Championship, to date only eleven of them have heeded the call, turning up on track, some later than others, and while some have managed just a few hundred kilometres, others have done more, but at a much reduced pace. As for the twelfth team, Campos Meta, its shareholder and management structure has been transformed, according to rumours which have reached the Horse Whisperer through the paddock telegraph, with a sudden cash injection from a munificent white knight, well used to this sort of last minute rescue deal. However, the beneficiaries of this generosity might find the knight in question expects them to fulfil the role of loyal vassal. All this means, it is hard to imagine the Dallara designed car showing its face at the Catalunya Circuit, with Sakhir a more likely venue to witness the return of the Senna name to a Formula 1 session.
The thirteenth team, USF1, appears to have gone into hiding in Charlotte, North Carolina, to the dismay of those like the Argentinian, Lopez, who thought he had found his way into the Formula 1 paddock, (albeit with help from chairwoman Kirchner, according to the rumours) and now has to start all over again. Amazingly, they still have the impudence to claim that everything is hunky-dory under the starry stripy sky.
Next, we have the Serbian vultures. Firstly, they launched themselves into a quixotic legal battle with the FIA, then they picked the bones of Toyota on its death bed. Having got some people on board, around whom there was still a whiff of past scandals, they are now hovering around waiting to replace whoever is first to drop out of the game, possibly with backing from that very same knight in shining armour whom we mentioned earlier.
This is the legacy of the holy war waged by the former FIA president. The cause in question was to allow smaller teams to get into Formula 1. This is the outcome: two teams will limp into the start of the championship, a third is being pushed into the ring by an invisible hand – you can be sure it is not the hand of Adam Smith – and, as for the fourth, well, you would do better to call on Missing Persons to locate it. In the meantime, we have lost two constructors along the way, in the shape of BMW and Toyota, while at Renault, there’s not much left other than the name. Was it all worth it?
I don't usually agree with Ferrari, and there seems to be a bit of conspiracy theory there - but it makes some sense to me.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 11:03
by rffp
I agree with what Ferrari has said about the new teams. There are a bunch of hacks trying to find their way into F-1, and they are nothing like the garagists of old time. These guys come into F-1 with enthusiasm but no planning, no skills and no capacity to do the bare minimum. It reminds me of the new teams that sprung when turbos were outlawed
But exactly what has been Ferrari's contribution to improve the game in F-1? I don't like Max, I think that under his watch F-1 became a hostage of the manufacturers. But to attribute the forfeit of BMW, Toyota, etc. to Max is to distort the truth. They left officially because of the financial crisis, but mostly because they had no commitment to the sport and they are a bunch of sore losers.
Now it comes to Jean Todt to set the path for capable and committed to F-1. And it will happen through a clever reduction of costs, not some idiotic idea like the budget cap.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 14:55
by Phoenix
God, I swear I had an eerie thought when I read the title of this thread...
Anyway, a 3-team merge seems improbable. I can see 2 of the new teams merging, but 3?! There would be no consensus. Although it would be funny to see the creation of a giant super-reject team
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Just too messy, in my opinion.
And i agree with rffp with his point of a clever cost reduction. Thinking about, the budget cap was nothing but an impromptu and non-feasible (by FIA standards) idea.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 16:21
by madcat
Three rejects don't make a right...
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 17:12
by elho
rffp wrote:I agree with what Ferrari has said about the new teams. There are a bunch of hacks trying to find their way into F-1, and they are nothing like the garagists of old time. These guys come into F-1 with enthusiasm but no planning, no skills and no capacity to do the bare minimum. It reminds me of the new teams that sprung when turbos were outlawed
but the choice process made by FIA was kinda obscure.
I still don't understand why Epsilon Euskadi was rejected, they have a lot of experience and even built a Le Mans prototype.
they had much better chance of being on the grid than USF1, that had nothing them. and now have a nose.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 17:21
by mario
madcat wrote:Three rejects don't make a right...
All that three reject teams would create would be one almightly disaster waiting to happen.
Realistically, out of the three teams, Campos is probably in the best position (or, as is probably better to say, the least weak position), since they have a car, entry rights and all the necessary contracts sorted out. Realistically, all that they need in order to get off the ground would be capital investment, and a few more experienced staff - which they should hopefully be getting now that they have been bought out by Campos's business partner.
Stefan GP do have a car, which is probably obsolete by now, although they do have an engine which has been proven to work (the Toyota RVX series engine). However, they don't seem to be bringing in much money, and realistically they have not got that much more of a chance then either USF1 or Campos, both in terms of competitiveness, and actually surviving beyond the end of the season.
Speaking of which, out of all of them it is USF1 which has the biggest problems. Their principal backer (Hurley) has seemingly abandoned them to their fate (although, to be honest, he didn't seem to be that engaged from the start), they have a few designs and contracts for the 2010 season, the facility over in Spain (which seems to be a large warehouse and a few other bits and bobs) - but a lot of liabilities and a conspicuous lack of cars.
So, out of the options, I suppose that a USF1-Stefan GP merger would be most logical (although the reality is that it probably won't happen, and that the FIA will simply withdraw the entry for USF1 before Bahrein).
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 17:49
by Stefangp
Mmm...pondering this proposal, I think that Campos Meta, or whatever there new name is now Adrian has been unceremoniously dumped, will think that they can just about coble a gearbox and Cosworth to the back of a Dallara chassis, so I don't think that will happen.
The USF1 and Stefan GP merger is more plausible, although geographically impractical. With USF1 in Charlotte & Spain and Stefan GP in Serbia & Cologne with Toyota support coming Japan (and Cologne too!), having a team spread over 4-5 counties would not work at all.
Plus, if there were to be a merger between Stefan GP and USF1, who would have the upper-hand in saying who manages the team and what it will be called? USF1 has the FIA entry but nothing else yet Stefan GP seemingly have a complete chassis and engine, plus at least one driver who is committed to the cause (Nakajima with Lopez and "chairwoman Argentina" as Ferrari so literally translated it today said, flashing their eyelids to Kolles and the new squad.)
My money would be on either Stefan GP getting the USF1 slot after they are struck off from the FIA list, or Stefan GP testing the year round and coming to the grid in 2011.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 17:58
by Waris
Stefangp wrote:Mmm...pondering this proposal, I think that Campos Meta, or whatever there new name is now Adrian has been unceremoniously dumped, will think that they can just about coble a gearbox and Cosworth to the back of a Dallara chassis, so I don't think that will happen.
The USF1 and Stefan GP merger is more plausible, although geographically impractical. With USF1 in Charlotte & Spain and Stefan GP in Serbia & Cologne with Toyota support coming Japan (and Cologne too!), having a team spread over 4-5 counties would not work at all.
Plus, if there were to be a merger between Stefan GP and USF1, who would have the upper-hand in saying who manages the team and what it will be called? USF1 has the FIA entry but nothing else yet Stefan GP seemingly have a complete chassis and engine, plus at least one driver who is committed to the cause (Nakajima with Lopez and "chairwoman Argentina" as Ferrari so literally translated it today said, flashing their eyelids to Kolles and the new squad.)
My money would be on either Stefan GP getting the USF1 slot after they are struck off from the FIA list, or Stefan GP testing the year round and coming to the grid in 2011.
They can't test without tyres.
Though, maybe if they can get an entry for 2011 early, whoever the new tyre supplier will be (or maybe Bridgestone'll stick around) will be willing to give them tyres.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 18:23
by Stefangp
They can't test without tyres.
Though, maybe if they can get an entry for 2011 early, whoever the new tyre supplier will be (or maybe Bridgestone'll stick around) will be willing to give them tyres.
Waris, an interesting point. I presume back in 2001 when Michelin supplied Toyota their tyres during the year of testing, either Michelin didn't have that rule back then or Toyota already had their 2002 grid slot.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 18:33
by CarlosFerreira
Who else thinks it was never USF1's intention to make it to the grid - and that neither it is StefanGP's, so rendering a farcical merger impossible?
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 18:35
by shinji
CarlosFerreira wrote:Who else thinks it was never USF1's intention to make it to the grid - and that neither it is StefanGP's, so rendering a farcical merger impossible?
I think USF1 were realistic, once.
I'm increasingly coming round to your way of thinking on Stefan though.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 18:51
by Phoenix
CarlosFerreira wrote:Who else thinks it was never USF1's intention to make it to the grid - and that neither it is StefanGP's, so rendering a farcical merger impossible?
Yeah, it's a common joke nowadays. You call the FIA saying you want to enter F1 and that you have a project with sponsors. As it turns out, you release a lot of fake media to keep things going until a month before starting the season. Then, you say that you have financial troubles and that you won't make it to the first 4 races. When the 2 first races are done, you go and say that you will never be able to make it, and slip quietly into oblivion, all the while laughing you like a lunatic in your inside...
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 19:07
by AndreaModa
I'd just like to comment on the Ferrari column released today, as mentioned above in this thread.
As far as I'm concerned, its elitist bullshit from a greedy team worried that the TV revenue will be split between most likely 12 teams rather than the 10 for the past few years.
I'm sorry for the strong feelings but the day that Ferrari end up solidly mid-pack like they were for most of the 70s and they're forced to eat some humble pie whilst other teams dominate the championship will be a great day in my opinion.
Yes we know the new teams are in a bit of cack right now, but it will all get sorted, the fact we even have two new teams is something to celebrate, and if Campos are saved as it is increasingly looking like they might be then why all this rubbish metaphorism from what is meant to be one of the more professional teams on the grid?
Smacks of the desperation of a team that are worried about their prospects for the upcoming season. Poor show Ferrari, very poor show.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 19:08
by CarlosFerreira
Phoenix wrote:CarlosFerreira wrote:Who else thinks it was never USF1's intention to make it to the grid - and that neither it is StefanGP's, so rendering a farcical merger impossible?
Yeah, it's a common joke nowadays. You call the FIA saying you want to enter F1 and that you have a project with sponsors. As it turns out, you release a lot of fake media to keep things going until a month before starting the season. Then, you say that you have financial troubles and that you won't make it to the first 4 races. When the 2 first races are done, you go and say that you will never be able to make it, and slip quietly into oblivion, all the while laughing you like a lunatic in your inside...
Wrong. You obtain a valuable asset - a car, or entry to the World Championship - that you don't intend to use; and then sell it on. It's the same with buying a house to make a profit.
As I said,
on the money.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 19:09
by shinji
AndreaModa wrote:I'm sorry for the strong feelings but the day that Ferrari end up solidly mid-pack like they were for most of the 70s and they're forced to eat some humble pie whilst other teams dominate the championship will be a great day in my opinion.
It's happening man. It's happening.
Or at least it happened. Last season will be Ferrari's worst for the foreseeable future.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 19:11
by Phoenix
CarlosFerreira wrote:Phoenix wrote:CarlosFerreira wrote:Who else thinks it was never USF1's intention to make it to the grid - and that neither it is StefanGP's, so rendering a farcical merger impossible?
Yeah, it's a common joke nowadays. You call the FIA saying you want to enter F1 and that you have a project with sponsors. As it turns out, you release a lot of fake media to keep things going until a month before starting the season. Then, you say that you have financial troubles and that you won't make it to the first 4 races. When the 2 first races are done, you go and say that you will never be able to make it, and slip quietly into oblivion, all the while laughing you like a lunatic in your inside...
Wrong. You obtain a valuable asset - a car, or entry to the World Championship - that you don't intend to use; and then sell it on. It's the same with buying a house to make a profit.
As I said,
on the money.
Never thought about that. I never thought someone could do something like that in F1. But this season, who's going to take on that? USF1 has no car, and Stefan no money...
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 19:13
by CarlosFerreira
Phoenix wrote:Never thought about that. I never thought someone could do something like that in F1. But this season, who's going to take on that? USF1 has no car, and Stefan no money...
I think they were sort of counting on each other to come up with the money and unload the goods...
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 19:15
by Phoenix
CarlosFerreira wrote:Phoenix wrote:Never thought about that. I never thought someone could do something like that in F1. But this season, who's going to take on that? USF1 has no car, and Stefan no money...
I think they were sort of counting on each other to come up with the money and unload the goods...
Result: an useless farce. At least Stefan can try to sell the car next year with some luck...
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 19:18
by AndreaModa
shinji wrote:AndreaModa wrote:I'm sorry for the strong feelings but the day that Ferrari end up solidly mid-pack like they were for most of the 70s and they're forced to eat some humble pie whilst other teams dominate the championship will be a great day in my opinion.
It's happening man. It's happening.
Or at least it happened. Last season will be Ferrari's worst for the foreseeable future.
oh indeed but i think for it to have any real effect, it needs to be a good 3-4 year period.
And for the record, I'm not a Ferrari hater, I'm just fed up of all the rubbish they keep harping on all year. None of the other teams do it, but Ferrari have to, almost like an inferiority complex. Maybe its got something to do with being owned by Fiat. That would get me down quite a lot too.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 20:17
by Stefangp
Result: an useless farce. At least Stefan can try to sell the car next year with some luck...
CarlosFerreira wrote:
Who else thinks it was never USF1's intention to make it to the grid - and that neither it is StefanGP's, so rendering a farcical merger impossible?
I wouldn't be too quick to dismiss Stefan GP given that Mr. Stefanovic has been interested in F1 and Motor Racing for 25 years. This from an interview when he had announced his complaint with the EU.
When did you decide that you wanted to enter F1?
Basically 25 years ago. I was always interested in engineering production and since starting our engineering business we are certain that motorsport, especially Formula 1, will be the ultimate goal for us. I tried to do it before, but all the pieces could not quite fall in place, so we did not publish all the details in the media. Nevertheless it was not without its achievements, as we managed to secure proper funding. Regarding our technical capabilities at this time (1997) we built titanium pneumatic valves for an F1 customer in England
And I wouldn't dismiss the fact that he has no money given the fact that
http://www.amco.st/index.php AMCO, Mr. Stefanovic's company, manufacturer Helicopters, Aircraft and Rockets and selling to various Military around the world. AMCO has 4 wind tunnels, 2 of which Mr. Stefanovic says are at the disposal of the team.
The word that the Serbian government are backing the team is probably linked to AMCO with some deal being done there. Don't forget, as someone has mentioned in a previous thread, Serbia is trying to shake off the stigma of the old Eastern bloc countries (tractors and donkeys I think were mentioned!) and having a team in F1 is a sure-fire way of spreading the word around the world that the country is well and truly into the 21st century.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 23 Feb 2010, 20:50
by rffp
elho wrote:rffp wrote:I agree with what Ferrari has said about the new teams. There are a bunch of hacks trying to find their way into F-1, and they are nothing like the garagists of old time. These guys come into F-1 with enthusiasm but no planning, no skills and no capacity to do the bare minimum. It reminds me of the new teams that sprung when turbos were outlawed
but the choice process made by FIA was kinda obscure.
I still don't understand why Epsilon Euskadi was rejected, they have a lot of experience and even built a Le Mans prototype.
they had much better chance of being on the grid than USF1, that had nothing them. and now have a nose.
100% agreed. In another post, I already made that point.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 24 Feb 2010, 05:36
by TomWazzleshaw
elho wrote:but the choice process made by FIA was kinda obscure.
I still don't understand why Epsilon Euskadi was rejected, they have a lot of experience and even built a Le Mans prototype.
they had much better chance of being on the grid than USF1, that had nothing them. and now have a nose.
Anything the FIA does is obscure and incredibly hard to understand the logic behind.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 24 Feb 2010, 08:57
by Stefangp
Wizzie wrote:elho wrote:but the choice process made by FIA was kinda obscure.
I still don't understand why Epsilon Euskadi was rejected, they have a lot of experience and even built a Le Mans prototype.
they had much better chance of being on the grid than USF1, that had nothing them. and now have a nose.
Anything the FIA does is obscure and incredibly hard to understand the logic behind.
Well, don't forget that Max was a supporter of the original Manor/Virgin team that had Nick Wirth at the helm. Plus, didn't one of his righthand men used to work with John Booth?
To be fair to Manor/Virgin & Lotus, at least they're out there with a car and are ready to run. I would be supporting Lotus (3rd after Mark Webber and Stefan GP if they every get in) but they have such a boring line-up.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 24 Feb 2010, 09:47
by Tealy
Stefangp wrote:When did you decide that you wanted to enter F1?
Basically 25 years ago. I was always interested in engineering production and since starting our engineering business we are certain that motorsport, especially Formula 1, will be the ultimate goal for us. I tried to do it before, but all the pieces could not quite fall in place, so we did not publish all the details in the media. Nevertheless it was not without its achievements, as we managed to secure proper funding. Regarding our technical capabilities at this time (1997) we built titanium pneumatic valves for an F1 customer in England
And I wouldn't dismiss the fact that he has no money given the fact that
http://www.amco.st/index.php AMCO, Mr. Stefanovic's company, manufacturer Helicopters, Aircraft and Rockets and selling to various Military around the world. AMCO has 4 wind tunnels, 2 of which Mr. Stefanovic says are at the disposal of the team.
The word that the Serbian government are backing the team is probably linked to AMCO with some deal being done there. Don't forget, as someone has mentioned in a previous thread, Serbia is trying to shake off the stigma of the old Eastern bloc countries (tractors and donkeys I think were mentioned!) and having a team in F1 is a sure-fire way of spreading the word around the world that the country is well and truly into the 21st century.
is it just me who is impressed with Zoran's English compared to their website?
In terms of Stefan GP hoping to make the grid or simply to earn money. I personally think he genuinely wanted a grid slot but has had to rethink in case he fails to get one. If you were just trying to sell car parts etc. you wouldn't hire people like Couchlan who would demand a relatively high salary. I don't think we will see Stefan GP make the grid this year though.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 24 Feb 2010, 12:26
by CarlosFerreira
Stefangp wrote:And I wouldn't dismiss the fact that he has no money given the fact that
http://www.amco.st/index.php AMCO, Mr. Stefanovic's company, manufacturer Helicopters, Aircraft and Rockets and selling to various Military around the world. AMCO has 4 wind tunnels, 2 of which Mr. Stefanovic says are at the disposal of the team.
The word that the Serbian government are backing the team is probably linked to AMCO with some deal being done there. Don't forget, as someone has mentioned in a previous thread, Serbia is trying to shake off the stigma of the old Eastern bloc countries (tractors and donkeys I think were mentioned!) and having a team in F1 is a sure-fire way of spreading the word around the world that the country is well and truly into the 21st century.
StefanGP, before answering allow me to apologise if some of my comments a bit on the dry side. You will note my sig actually mentions the same thing as Tealy's last post; not so much English grammar chauvinism as the realization that I could have made StefanGP's website on OpenOffice during a coffee break myself. Which is probably how it was crafted, by someone who takes a more liberal approach to spelling than me.
First, the motorsport connection. When Mr Stefanovic says there's a 25 year expertise to draw upon, what he means is one of his companies has been making gearbox casings for old Porsches and assorted stuff. He mentions in the interview that they've also manufactured pneumatic titanium valves in 1997 - years ago. That was the year Jacques Villeneuve took the F1 title in an Adrian Newey-designed Williams, powered by a 3 litre V10 Renault engine. I suppose the English costumer Mr Stefan talks about was either Ford Cosworth (unlikely) or the Hart V8. Not very impressive, although I am assuming that neither the Renault, the Mercedes or the Yamaha were the "English costumer", and I may be wrong. But there's something about the Hart idea that somehow feels like more than idle speculation.
Regarding the AMCO connection: Mr Stefaovic's company can make him a large deal of money, no doubt, but moving money from there into an F1 foray is not the way things are made. We are not in the 1950's anymore, and people don't take money from their day-to-day business to pour into F1. Regardless of how large and profitable AMCO is, pouring money into F1 would not be productive. While Force India's Mr Vijay Mallya can decide to sponsor the racing outfit and obtain a return thanks to exposure, arms companies don't sponsor their efforts to the public much; they lobby within government and civil servants, who are their potential costumers.
Still the AMCO connection: so, they have 4 wind tunnels; if they are idle, something is seriously wrong. They need to focus on their business, and the existence of idle wind tunnels means they're losing money. Perhaps they cold rent them to a team for a fee, but would they have the necessary tech to do so?
Finally, the Serbian state connection: direct state sponsorship of a racing team is not the way Belgrade is going to look forward and impress Eurocrats, especially immediately after an economic crisis which wrecked havoc in the region; reform, markets and forward-thinking are. All the while, Croatia nudges ahead with its own application...
In short, this all shenanigan sounded funny when it first emerged. Now it just sounds like a cluttered attempt either make a quick buck, or alternatively to go to the North Pole wearing a T-shirt and slippers.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 24 Feb 2010, 12:59
by rffp
CarlosFerreira wrote:Regarding the AMCO connection: Mr Stefaovic's company can make him a large deal of money, no doubt, but moving money from there into an F1 foray is not the way things are made. We are not in the 1950's anymore, and people don't take money from their day-to-day business to pour into F1. Regardless of how large and profitable AMCO is, pouring money into F1 would not be productive. While Force India's Mr Vijay Mallya can decide to sponsor the racing outfit and obtain a return thanks to exposure, arms companies don't sponsor their efforts to the public much; they lobby within government and civil servants, who are their potential costumers.
I have seen my fair share of strange sponsorship, even in F-1. Do you recall Moneytron? In football, there is much more, such as undertakers. Corrupt companies have sponsored sports throughtout the decades to evade taxes or simply find a way to send money to offshore companies. This is the reason why budget cap would never work, despite how hard governments and regulatory agencies try, there are still thousands of ways for money to flow from one place to another.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 24 Feb 2010, 13:19
by BigG80
An excellent post there Carlos.
It does indeed look like the plucky Serbian upstarts that we all loved to support are not what we would wish to them to be.
I can't help feeling saddened by that.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 24 Feb 2010, 13:28
by CarlosFerreira
BigG80 wrote:An excellent post there Carlos.
Thanks. kostas22 always says I talk a load of crap (I do!), so it's nice to put in the effort at times.
BigG80 wrote:It does indeed look like the plucky Serbian upstarts that we all loved to support are not what we would wish to them to be.
I can't help feeling saddened by that.
Yeah, don't get me wrong - I wish they were a proper team, and would be accordingly rewarded with an entry to the Championship. It's just that I think they aren't, and as a result they probably shouldn't.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 25 Feb 2010, 10:59
by mario
CarlosFerreira wrote:BigG80 wrote:An excellent post there Carlos.
Thanks. kostas22 always says I talk a load of crap (I do!), so it's nice to put in the effort at times.
BigG80 wrote:It does indeed look like the plucky Serbian upstarts that we all loved to support are not what we would wish to them to be.
I can't help feeling saddened by that.
Yeah, don't get me wrong - I wish they were a proper team, and would be accordingly rewarded with an entry to the Championship. It's just that I think they aren't, and as a result they probably shouldn't.
True - as more details emerge, Stefan's outfit seems to be less and less believable. Harsh as Ferrari's comparison of Stefan GP to vultures was, since this team now looks more like an attempt to cash in on Toyota's misfortunes, you can see why the comparison was made (whether it was fair is another matter). And CarlosFerreira, your previous post is an excellent synopsis of the situation.
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 25 Feb 2010, 14:03
by Phoenix
Thinking about, it was more a case about being dragged by the Reject bandwagon. The comparison of Stefan GP with vultures seems rather appropiate. It's not realistical. But at least this time they tried it with a car that (theoretically) wasn't 11 seconds off the pace...
Re: Pooling our weaknesses together
Posted: 25 Feb 2010, 21:05
by Waris
Stefangp wrote:They can't test without tyres.
Though, maybe if they can get an entry for 2011 early, whoever the new tyre supplier will be (or maybe Bridgestone'll stick around) will be willing to give them tyres.
Waris, an interesting point. I presume back in 2001 when Michelin supplied Toyota their tyres during the year of testing, either Michelin didn't have that rule back then or Toyota already had their 2002 grid slot.
That, or Toyota bought tires from Michelin. But Stefanovic has said he will not buy tyres from a different manufacturer, because of safety concerns.
I still think Stefan GP are a great deal more credible than everyone expected them to be at first, and I'm still positively surprised by that. Now if they sign Jacques Villeneuve, that would make me find them more than epic.