Link: http://www.portalsportszone.com.br/noti ... ia_290.htm
F1 Comedy - Youtube videos and the Formula 1 and FOM
F1 Comedy - Youtube videos and the Formula 1 and FOM
Today we're not talking a pilot, but let's make a joke about the FOM that takes videos of Formula 1 racing in order to invite the so inexperienced Awesore and Fu to make that joke, it's worth seeing the movie, he has a little less than 1 minute.
Link: http://www.portalsportszone.com.br/noti ... ia_290.htm
Link: http://www.portalsportszone.com.br/noti ... ia_290.htm
Last edited by deivison on 31 Aug 2011, 19:36, edited 2 times in total.
-
DemocalypseNow
- Posts: 13185
- Joined: 17 Aug 2009, 09:30
- Location: Lost, send help
- Contact:
Re: F1 Comedy - Youtube videos and the Formula 1 and FOM
Linkbucks = Spammer.
Novitopoli wrote:Everytime someone orders at Pizza Hut, an Italian dies.
Novitopoli wrote:Juve's Triplete: Calciopoli, doping & Mafia connections.
Re: F1 Comedy - Youtube videos and the Formula 1 and FOM
kostas22 wrote:Linkbucks = Spammer.
This, IMO, isn't spam. So I won't delete it. Whoever wants to see it, be his guest. If not, don't see it.
Re: F1 Comedy - Youtube videos and the Formula 1 and FOM
I don't understand the Iberian language that the video clip is in, so was able to get nothing out of it.
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
MCard LOLAdinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
Re: F1 Comedy - Youtube videos and the Formula 1 and FOM
From this thread:
Couldn't agree more. While they tended to flag more recent videos like that, I've seen that block screen in videos that should be (judging by the title, at least) from as far back as the 1991 season!
My take on that is... technically, they have the right to do that, but... frankly, they should be more sensible about that. Most videos I saw from that era were captured from old VHS tapes that were otherwise fated to oblivion and were already showing defects at the time of capture. OK, sometimes people stretch it, posting stuff from like last race and using the maximum video length allowed by YouTube to post as much of the race as possible... but seriously, small clips at low resolution like most of what we see on YouTube would even qualify as "fair use", I think (I'm not a lawyer).
That's in Portuguese - I may provide a translation later.
Shizuka wrote:Phoenix wrote:Wizzie wrote:Was Di Resta the Force India who damaged his front wing on the first lap after being shoved into the back of Button by Glock?
I think he was indeed http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDnIDZUoEAA
"Formula 1 F1 2011 Belgium G..."
This video is no longer available because the YouTube account associated with this video has been terminated due to multiple third-party notifications of copyright infringement from claimants including:
Formula One Management
Formula One Management
Formula One Management
For Pete's sake, this is getting ridiculous!
Couldn't agree more. While they tended to flag more recent videos like that, I've seen that block screen in videos that should be (judging by the title, at least) from as far back as the 1991 season!
My take on that is... technically, they have the right to do that, but... frankly, they should be more sensible about that. Most videos I saw from that era were captured from old VHS tapes that were otherwise fated to oblivion and were already showing defects at the time of capture. OK, sometimes people stretch it, posting stuff from like last race and using the maximum video length allowed by YouTube to post as much of the race as possible... but seriously, small clips at low resolution like most of what we see on YouTube would even qualify as "fair use", I think (I'm not a lawyer).
dr-baker wrote:I don't understand the Iberian language that the video clip is in, so was able to get nothing out of it.
That's in Portuguese - I may provide a translation later.
