
Lots of supersofts.
I win Miguel98

AxelP800 wrote:I win Miguel98
Simtek wrote:AxelP800 wrote:I win Miguel98
Miguel 3-1 Axel.
Still 17 left to go
Mario on Gutierrez after the Italian Grand Prix wrote:He's no longer just a bit of a tool, he's the entire tool set.
Miguel98 wrote:On a more realistic bit: I wonder why ultra softs aren't used here? The track isn't abrasive enough, and I think the US tyre would survive a lap around here with quite a bit of ease.
solarcold wrote:remember: in Modern Russia Formula 1 watches YOU.
CoopsII wrote:solarcold wrote:remember: in Modern Russia Formula 1 watches YOU.
Then Formula 1 is in for some tedious viewing.
Is Sochi anywhere near you Solarcold? Are you going?
solarcold wrote:It's very far from me, I live at the extreme north of Russia, in Murmansk (and I like it here!).
Row Man Gross-Gene wrote:It looks like Haas, Williams, and Red Bull are going pretty aggressive with their tire strategies. Hopefully it works out.
WeirdKerr wrote:For a few seconds I thought that this thread was opened about 5 to 6 months too early then realised the Russian gp was early this year..... (between this and the fact I missed the start of the Shanghai race I think I'm going senile enough to take over from Mr Ecclestone)
watka wrote:Row Man Gross-Gene wrote:It looks like Haas, Williams, and Red Bull are going pretty aggressive with their tire strategies. Hopefully it works out.
On the other hand, Ferrari seem to have gone very conservative. So I predict qualifying will be the usual shootout between the Mercs, a second ahead of the field. Then Ferrari will be left with egg on their faces when the safety car periods allows drivers to stay out on supersofts for longer.
DanielPT wrote:watka wrote:Row Man Gross-Gene wrote:It looks like Haas, Williams, and Red Bull are going pretty aggressive with their tire strategies. Hopefully it works out.
On the other hand, Ferrari seem to have gone very conservative. So I predict qualifying will be the usual shootout between the Mercs, a second ahead of the field. Then Ferrari will be left with egg on their faces when the safety car periods allows drivers to stay out on supersofts for longer.
In another words, Ferrari will find yet another way of botching up a race...
solarcold wrote:CoopsII wrote:solarcold wrote:remember: in Modern Russia Formula 1 watches YOU.
Then Formula 1 is in for some tedious viewing.
Is Sochi anywhere near you Solarcold? Are you going?
Unfortunately no, but I'm planning to go there in sometime in future.
It's very far from me, I live at the extreme north of Russia, in Murmansk (and I like it here!).
But I've been to Sochi 7 times in childhood. It was VERY different before Olympics and F1. It was a relatively simple provincial town and I couldn't possibly imagine something like that would eventually go on there.
DanielPT wrote:watka wrote:Row Man Gross-Gene wrote:It looks like Haas, Williams, and Red Bull are going pretty aggressive with their tire strategies. Hopefully it works out.
On the other hand, Ferrari seem to have gone very conservative. So I predict qualifying will be the usual shootout between the Mercs, a second ahead of the field. Then Ferrari will be left with egg on their faces when the safety car periods allows drivers to stay out on supersofts for longer.
In another words, Ferrari will find yet another way of botching up a race...
This wrote:I'm sure Williams will find a way too. Yeah, it's gonna be an easy walk for Red Bull to become second in the constructors championship.
Dj_bereta wrote:Despite having a lot of super soft tyres, I believe Williams will try an one stop strategy, starting with super soft (Q2) and finishing with the medium tyres.
AxelP800 wrote:
I approve Sochi night race proposal.
Axel pls pls plspls...... Lower temps tends harder to overtake. See Milwaukee 2003
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:WTF did Brundle just say? Big debris-deflecting windscreens are a slippery slope to "driverless cars"?He's supposed to be one of the smart ones.
DanielPT wrote:UgncreativeUsergname wrote:WTF did Brundle just say? Big debris-deflecting windscreens are a slippery slope to "driverless cars"?He's supposed to be one of the smart ones.
Yeah... Perhaps someone failed to inform him that driverless cars will be a thing in a support race for FE next year. Anyway, the car needs a visible human factor otherwise no one will relate to which is not good for a standalone series.
Row Man Gross-Gene wrote:DanielPT wrote:UgncreativeUsergname wrote:WTF did Brundle just say? Big debris-deflecting windscreens are a slippery slope to "driverless cars"?He's supposed to be one of the smart ones.
Yeah... Perhaps someone failed to inform him that driverless cars will be a thing in a support race for FE next year. Anyway, the car needs a visible human factor otherwise no one will relate to which is not good for a standalone series.
I wonder if he means truly driverless or simply remotely-driven cars? Because there would be a difference. I doubt we'll see either case though because as DanielPT said, there would be no way to relate. Although, remotely-driven cars might result in more banzai passing moves (and also more wrecks), not that I'd advocate for that.
I must say that I'm excited to see Russia because I haven't seen the previous two races. Anyone care to enlighten me as to how good the last two races were?
Mitch Hedberg wrote:I want to be a race car passenger: just a guy who bugs the driver. Say man, can I turn on the radio? You should slow down. Why do we gotta keep going in circles? Man, you really like Tide...
Ataxia wrote:Row Man Gross-Gene wrote:DanielPT wrote:Yeah... Perhaps someone failed to inform him that driverless cars will be a thing in a support race for FE next year. Anyway, the car needs a visible human factor otherwise no one will relate to which is not good for a standalone series.
I wonder if he means truly driverless or simply remotely-driven cars? Because there would be a difference. I doubt we'll see either case though because as DanielPT said, there would be no way to relate. Although, remotely-driven cars might result in more banzai passing moves (and also more wrecks), not that I'd advocate for that.
I must say that I'm excited to see Russia because I haven't seen the previous two races. Anyone care to enlighten me as to how good the last two races were?
They've been very exciting races! Plenty of drama on-track, which is great to see.
kevinbotz wrote:Cantonese is a completely nonsensical f*cking alien language masquerading as some grossly bastardised form of Chinese
Gonzo wrote:Wasn't there some sort of communisim in the East part of Germany?
tommykl wrote:Ataxia wrote:Row Man Gross-Gene wrote:I must say that I'm excited to see Russia because I haven't seen the previous two races. Anyone care to enlighten me as to how good the last two races were?
They've been very exciting races! Plenty of drama on-track, which is great to see.
Of course they haven't. Don't you remember? Any race that doesn't include engines with at least 8 cylinders and that sound like nails on a chalkboard, has Pirelli tyres or doesn't have literally hundreds of non-DRS passes for the lead is automatically awful!
UgncreativeUsergname wrote:WTF did Brundle just say? Big debris-deflecting windscreens are a slippery slope to "driverless cars"?He's supposed to be one of the smart ones.
Dr. Helmut Marko wrote: Finally we have an Australian in the team who can start a race well and challenge Vettel.
Ataxia wrote:They've been very exciting races! Plenty of drama on-track, which is great to see.
Row Man Gross-Gene wrote:Ataxia wrote:They've been very exciting races! Plenty of drama on-track, which is great to see.
I should say I meant the last 2 Russian GPs, not the last two races this year (after I re-read my question, it seemed like it might not have been clear). But hopefully that is what you were talking about and an exciting race is on the docket.
Mitch Hedberg wrote:I want to be a race car passenger: just a guy who bugs the driver. Say man, can I turn on the radio? You should slow down. Why do we gotta keep going in circles? Man, you really like Tide...
Felipe Nasr - the least forgettable F1 driver!Murray Walker at the 1997 Austrian Grand Prix wrote:The other [Stewart] driver, who nobody's been paying attention to, because he's disappointing, is Jan Magnussen.
Rob Dylan wrote:This year is turning out to be such a 2004. So much hype by Mercedes' competitors that they're going to 'take the fight to them', then none of them can get their act together properly to put a serious challenge to them. Ferrari has taken points away from themselves every race this year so far, and now Red Bull are showing enough pace that Vettel and Raikkonen are no longer isolated in 2nd as they believed they would be.
Given the high expectations of Ferrari's supposed championship challenge, and the low expectations of Red Bull's issues with engine deals and the like recently, I think it's the latter who are impressing in a bid to beat Mercedes.
I mean, if I were to put money on it, I can imagine Ricciardo or Kvyat being the first non-Mercedes winner this year.
Rob Dylan wrote:Mercedes paying homage to the other W12 chassis by breaking down 30 minutes in
Felipe Nasr - the least forgettable F1 driver!Murray Walker at the 1997 Austrian Grand Prix wrote:The other [Stewart] driver, who nobody's been paying attention to, because he's disappointing, is Jan Magnussen.
Rob Dylan wrote:Looks like a ROBERGWINSLOL race again. Vettel's got a penalty which will put him out of first-corner contention against Rosberg, and Hamilton will possibly get penalised if they change any more car parts overnight (also wasn't there another stewards enquiry over him driving around turn 2 during the session?).
Good to see the Williams cars doing well, at least. It will be interesting to see if Bottas and Massa can get a decent result and turn around the comparatively mediocre form of this year so far.
Fetzie on Ferrari wrote:How does a driver hurtling around a race track while they're sous-viding in their overalls have a better understanding of the race than a team of strategy engineers in an air-conditioned room?l