I thought it would be interesting to compare some of the cream using the current points system (I have taken 7 drivers – mention any others I have missed):
Kamui Kobayashi – 27 points (14 races, 20 actual points)
Kazuki Nakajima – 34 points (36 races, 9 actual points)
Shinji Nakano - 45 points (33 races, 2 actual points)
Ukyo Katayama – 65 points (97 races, 5 actual points)
Aguri Suzuki – 88 points (88 races, 8 actual points (1 podium))
Takuma Sato – 135 points (93 Races, 44 actual points (1 podium))
Satoru Nakajima – 154 points(!!!) (80 Races, 16 actual points (1 fastest lap))
Obviously the board-favourite Kobayashi has a long way to go to go to work his way up but he has shown some genuine talent in some of his drives. Will he make it or will he end up as another almost-but-not-quite-but-we-still-love-him Japanese driver? He still hasn’t escaped reject status and even then he will need to go a fair way to match the level of Sato & Nakajima (and even Katayama & Suzuki) if he wants to be classed as the best of the best...
It also shows how much the new points system is going to make a joke out of the record books... (Taku & Satoru would both have more points under this system than Gilles Villeneuve actually got in his career...
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
Anyway I just thought I would throw this out and see what people think about this...
Edit: added the 'great' Shinji
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)