2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

The place for speaking your mind on current goings-on in F1
User avatar
CarlosFerreira
Posts: 4974
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 14:31
Location: UK

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by CarlosFerreira »

Catching up with qualy on iPlayer now. Tell you what, Liuzzi is going to need to produce something special to escape ROTR...
Stay home, Colin Kolles!
User avatar
eagleash
Posts: 2222
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 18:22
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by eagleash »

Slightly off topic but is anyone else a bit frustrated that Q3 is so short?
DemocalypseNow wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
User avatar
FullMetalJack
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6273
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 15:32
Location: Some place far away. Yes, that'll do.

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by FullMetalJack »

The first time i've ever wanted to see a Force India not do well as I didn't want to Sutil to knock Barrichello out in Q2. Glad to see the HRT cars not too far off the Lotuses and the Virgins.
I like the way Snrub thinks!
User avatar
CarlosFerreira
Posts: 4974
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 14:31
Location: UK

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by CarlosFerreira »

redbulljack14 wrote:The first time i've ever wanted to see a Force India not do well as I didn't want to Sutil to knock Barrichello out in Q2. Glad to see the HRT cars not too far off the Lotuses and the Virgins.


Man's got a decent avatar and says nice things. :D

Dear Mark Webber,

Please ram Mr Vettel out of turn 1.

Best,

Carlos
Stay home, Colin Kolles!
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8269
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by mario »

Time to throw a few figures into the discussion, since there are a few interesting things to note.
Firstly, Vettel was gaining the most time in sector 3 against his rivals - he was surprisingly quick on the back straight, and picked up 0.15s there over Rosberg (the next fastest in that sector). Webber is matching him measure for measure in the first two sectors, but the fact that Vettel was picking up 4kph over him on the back straight indicates that either Mark is running a fraction more wing, or Vettel is getting a cleaner exit onto the back straight. Either way, Webber is losing time in that sector - he is 0.25s off Vettel there.
Rosberg is surprisingly strong in sectors 1 and 3, but weaker in sector 2 (losing 0.2s to Webber in that sector), which is the most technical part of the circuit. Schumacher is virtually as fast as Rosberg in that sector, but he loses out big time in sector 1 (over 0.3s) and sector 3 (another 0.2s). I wonder if this is connected to the fact that Mercedes are trying out a new rear wing, which is running a preliminary F-duct? Rosberg is using the old wing, and Schumacher the new wing.
Anyway, here are the sector times:

    SECTOR 1
    POS NO DRIVER TIME
    1 5 S. VETTEL 24.816
    2 4 N. ROSBERG 24.828
    3 6 M. WEBBER 24.833
    4 2 L. HAMILTON 24.847
    5 8 F. ALONSO 24.910
    6 1 J. BUTTON 24.933
    7 7 F. MASSA 24.939
    8 14 A. SUTIL 25.024
    9 9 R. BARRICHELLO 25.033
    10 11 R. KUBICA 25.053
    11 3 M. SCHUMACHER 25.121
    12 16 S. BUEMI 25.148
    13 17 J. ALGUERSUARI 25.209
    14 10 N. HULKENBERG 25.353
    15 23 K. KOBAYASHI 25.393
    16 12 V. PETROV 25.398
    17 15 V. LIUZZI 25.408
    18 22 P. DE LA ROSA 25.463
    19 19 H. KOVALAINEN 25.910
    20 24 T. GLOCK 25.974
    21 25 L. DI GRASSI 25.980
    22 18 J. TRULLI 26.004
    23 20 K. CHANDHOK 26.384
    24 21 B. SENNA 26.400

    SECTOR 2
    NO DRIVER TIME
    6 M. WEBBER 27.875
    5 S. VETTEL 27.879
    2 L. HAMILTON 27.934
    7 F. MASSA 28.001
    8 F. ALONSO 28.023
    4 N. ROSBERG 28.067
    1 J. BUTTON 28.073
    3 M. SCHUMACHER 28.156
    11 R. KUBICA 28.169
    17 J. ALGUERSUARI 28.209
    12 V. PETROV 28.322
    16 S. BUEMI 28.341
    23 K. KOBAYASHI 28.343
    22 P. DE LA ROSA 28.352
    9 R. BARRICHELLO 28.428
    14 A. SUTIL 28.450
    10 N. HULKENBERG 28.537
    15 V. LIUZZI 28.813
    18 J. TRULLI 29.644
    19 H. KOVALAINEN 29.659
    25 L. DI GRASSI 29.796
    24 T. GLOCK 29.913
    20 K. CHANDHOK 30.079
    21 B. SENNA 30.129

    SECTOR 3
    NO DRIVER TIME
    5 S. VETTEL 41.811
    4 N. ROSBERG 41.962
    1 J. BUTTON 41.973
    8 F. ALONSO 41.980
    2 L. HAMILTON 42.077
    6 M. WEBBER 42.077
    7 F. MASSA 42.124
    14 A. SUTIL 42.125
    11 R. KUBICA 42.142
    9 R. BARRICHELLO 42.162
    3 M. SCHUMACHER 42.169
    17 J. ALGUERSUARI 42.354
    16 S. BUEMI 42.441
    12 V. PETROV 42.508
    23 K. KOBAYASHI 42.628
    10 N. HULKENBERG 42.697
    22 P. DE LA ROSA 42.827
    15 V. LIUZZI 42.940
    24 T. GLOCK 43.391
    18 J. TRULLI 43.664
    19 H. KOVALAINEN 43.749
    21 B. SENNA 43.851
    25 L. DI GRASSI 43.922
    20 K. CHANDHOK 44.115

As an aside, here is the speed trap data. It looks as if there is nothing wrong with the Cosworth unit in terms of grunt - it is the Williams duo who top the speed trap on the back straight, and Rubens is pretty handy in the sector speed traps too. The HRT is also mightily quick on the straights (5th and 8th fastest) - but then again, they probably lack so much downforce that they probably have very little drag...

    POS NO DRIVER KPH TIME OF DAY
    1 10 N. HULKENBERG 310.0 14:32:07
    2 9 R. BARRICHELLO 309.8 14:32:53
    3 2 L. HAMILTON 309.3 14:30:45
    4 14 A. SUTIL 309.1 14:32:47
    5 21 B. SENNA 308.9 14:06:17
    6 1 J. BUTTON 308.8 14:31:05
    7 17 J. ALGUERSUARI 308.5 14:30:20
    8 20 K. CHANDHOK 308.2 14:18:41
    9 5 S. VETTEL 308.0 14:42:32
    10 12 V. PETROV 307.4 14:30:00
    11 11 R. KUBICA 306.9 14:32:58
    12 4 N. ROSBERG 306.3 14:31:42
    13 24 T. GLOCK 305.3 14:20:09
    14 3 M. SCHUMACHER 304.8 15:00:42
    15 15 V. LIUZZI 304.7 14:16:54
    16 8 F. ALONSO 304.7 14:30:56
    17 25 L. DI GRASSI 304.6 14:06:55
    18 16 S. BUEMI 304.3 14:31:46
    19 6 M. WEBBER 304.1 14:32:15
    20 7 F. MASSA 303.8 14:32:03
    21 23 K. KOBAYASHI 303.2 14:32:28
    22 19 H. KOVALAINEN 299.8 14:10:30
    23 18 J. TRULLI 299.5 14:11:08
    24 22 P. DE LA ROSA 297.9 14:34:42
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
eytl
F1 Rejects Founder
Posts: 1197
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 12:43
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by eytl »

Thanks for that Mario ... some interesting food for thought there ...
User avatar
watka
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4097
Joined: 26 Apr 2009, 19:04
Location: Chessington, the former home of Brabham
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by watka »

Have to say that McLaren seem to be Q3 chokers this season. Not only are they quickest often in the free practices, they are often the quickest in Q1 and 2, but they just haven't been able to challenge Red Bull. I don't think their tactics in qualifying made much sense either. They brought Hamilton in for a pit lane pit stop befire his final run in Q3, so that he could be sent out quickly. For his last qualifying lap, he crossed the line about 15 seconds before the flag dropped, but didn't do another lap, and therefore missed out on any advantage of being last on track.
Watka - you know, the swimming horses guy
User avatar
dr-baker
Posts: 15685
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 17:30
Location: Here and there.

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by dr-baker »

watka wrote:Have to say that McLaren seem to be Q3 chokers this season. Not only are they quickest often in the free practices, they are often the quickest in Q1 and 2, but they just haven't been able to challenge Red Bull. I don't think their tactics in qualifying made much sense either. They brought Hamilton in for a pit lane pit stop befire his final run in Q3, so that he could be sent out quickly. For his last qualifying lap, he crossed the line about 15 seconds before the flag dropped, but didn't do another lap, and therefore missed out on any advantage of being last on track.

And Button crossed the line at the end of his last flyer with about 2 seconds to go and didn't do another flyer...
watka wrote:I find it amusing that whilst you're one of the more openly Christian guys here, you are still first and foremost associated with an eye for the ladies!
dinizintheoven wrote:GOOD CHRISTIANS do not go to jail. EVERYONE ON FORMULA ONE REJECTS should be in jail.
MCard LOLA
User avatar
CarlosFerreira
Posts: 4974
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 14:31
Location: UK

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by CarlosFerreira »

dr-baker wrote:
watka wrote:Have to say that McLaren seem to be Q3 chokers this season. Not only are they quickest often in the free practices, they are often the quickest in Q1 and 2, but they just haven't been able to challenge Red Bull. I don't think their tactics in qualifying made much sense either. They brought Hamilton in for a pit lane pit stop befire his final run in Q3, so that he could be sent out quickly. For his last qualifying lap, he crossed the line about 15 seconds before the flag dropped, but didn't do another lap, and therefore missed out on any advantage of being last on track.

And Button crossed the line at the end of his last flyer with about 2 seconds to go and didn't do another flyer...


Both were on the softer rubber, and the tyres were probably toast after 1 flyer. I don't think those laps would have produced a better result, to be honest.

Williams still struggling. You can see, really can, that the car struggles to point its nose into corners. What the heck went wrong?
Stay home, Colin Kolles!
User avatar
FullMetalJack
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6273
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 15:32
Location: Some place far away. Yes, that'll do.

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by FullMetalJack »

CarlosFerreira wrote:Williams still struggling. You can see, really can, that the car struggles to point its nose into corners. What the heck went wrong?


Who knows, as long as it ends soon. How much would Barrichello have loved to have knocked Schumacher out at Q2?
I like the way Snrub thinks!
User avatar
CarlosFerreira
Posts: 4974
Joined: 02 Apr 2009, 14:31
Location: UK

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by CarlosFerreira »

redbulljack14 wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:Williams still struggling. You can see, really can, that the car struggles to point its nose into corners. What the heck went wrong?


Who knows, as long as it ends soon. How much would Barrichello have loved to have knocked Schumacher out at Q2?


3 tenths or so, wasn't it? Old cello would have been over the moon, I'm sure. There is something wrong with the Williams package, it's plain to see. Come on lads, sort it out!
Stay home, Colin Kolles!
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8269
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by mario »

CarlosFerreira wrote:
redbulljack14 wrote:
CarlosFerreira wrote:Williams still struggling. You can see, really can, that the car struggles to point its nose into corners. What the heck went wrong?


Who knows, as long as it ends soon. How much would Barrichello have loved to have knocked Schumacher out at Q2?


3 tenths or so, wasn't it? Old cello would have been over the moon, I'm sure. There is something wrong with the Williams package, it's plain to see. Come on lads, sort it out!


Closer to 3 hundreths between Rubens and Schumacher - Rubens must have been gritting his teeth when he realised that, but the FW32 doesn't look quite up to the job. I think that it is the same old problem that Williams have had for a long time now, which is a lack of downforce.
Coupled to that, it could also be the case that they made the same mistake as Mercedes have made with their car, and misjudged the weight distribution that they would need in order to get the most of the tyres (Brawn has admitted that Mercedes shifted the weight bias too far rearwards, overestimating the effect of the new front tyres).
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
Marco
Posts: 57
Joined: 28 Nov 2009, 16:29

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by Marco »

mario wrote:Rosberg is using the old wing, and Schumacher the new wing.

Nope. The Schu said this after quali, but he was wrong, both had the same wing.
crazydude1992
Posts: 113
Joined: 18 Apr 2009, 09:13

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by crazydude1992 »

:lol: Hamilton
Artificial intelligence is no match for F1 rejectdom.
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by thehemogoblin »

Rain: Weather I can believe in.

Current ROTR candidates: Virgin, Sauber, Alonso, those fools that pitted too many times
User avatar
IdeFan
Posts: 535
Joined: 31 Dec 2009, 00:51
Location: Hampshire, UK

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by IdeFan »

My RotR leader right now is Hamilton, lots of dodgy driving in the pit lane entrance.

Edit: As if in response, Lewis just passed two people in one corner!
"Well we've got this ridiculous situation where we're all sitting by the start-finish line waiting for a winner to come past and we don't seem to be getting one!" - James Hunt, Monaco 1982
User avatar
shinji
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4007
Joined: 18 May 2009, 17:02
Location: Hibernia

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by shinji »

This is awesome :D
Better than 'Tour in a suit case' Takagi.
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by thehemogoblin »

This is the perfect amount of rain to screw with everyone.
User avatar
FullMetalJack
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6273
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 15:32
Location: Some place far away. Yes, that'll do.

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by FullMetalJack »

This is good racing, I wonder if Petrov can stay in the top 4.
I like the way Snrub thinks!
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by thehemogoblin »

WTF is with the safety car?
eytl
F1 Rejects Founder
Posts: 1197
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 12:43
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by eytl »

Looks like it's for debris. What it has done is obliterated Button/Rosberg/Kubica's advantage and brought Schumacher, Hamilton and the Red Bulls right back into it.
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by thehemogoblin »

eytl wrote:Looks like it's for debris. What it has done is obliterated Button/Rosberg/Kubica's advantage and brought Schumacher, Hamilton and the Red Bulls right back into it.


F1's been Dale Juniored!
User avatar
FullMetalJack
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 6273
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 15:32
Location: Some place far away. Yes, that'll do.

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by FullMetalJack »

And we are racing again!
I like the way Snrub thinks!
User avatar
TomWazzleshaw
Posts: 14370
Joined: 01 Apr 2009, 04:42
Location: Curva do lel
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by TomWazzleshaw »

Petrov does his interpretation of Ice Skating and continues.
And boy was that restart messy.
Biscione wrote:"Some Turkemenistani gulag repurposed for residential use" is the best way yet I've heard to describe North / East Glasgow.
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by thehemogoblin »

Wizzie wrote:Petrov does his interpretation of Ice Skating and continues.
And boy was that restart messy.


Button broke the rules. He slowed down too much. This race is the stewards' nightmare. Issues everywhere.
User avatar
IdeFan
Posts: 535
Joined: 31 Dec 2009, 00:51
Location: Hampshire, UK

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by IdeFan »

I think Lewis Hamilton is going for the "How many times can you bother the stewards in one race" record!

Edit: Lewis now a few seconds behind Jenson, both on new inters, good for the end of the race - the battle is joined. If Lewis can poach this one off Jenson then that'll be a major psychological victory considering how far behind he was, even after the safety car he had to pass a hell of a lot of cars.
"Well we've got this ridiculous situation where we're all sitting by the start-finish line waiting for a winner to come past and we don't seem to be getting one!" - James Hunt, Monaco 1982
User avatar
thehemogoblin
Posts: 3684
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 02:14
Location: The great Pacific Northwest
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by thehemogoblin »

Adrian Sutil's pit crew has completely shattered his race.
User avatar
shinji
Site Donor
Site Donor
Posts: 4007
Joined: 18 May 2009, 17:02
Location: Hibernia

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by shinji »

Fair enough I suppose - Button made the right calls.

"What a victory! Ye-uh!"
Better than 'Tour in a suit case' Takagi.
User avatar
IdeFan
Posts: 535
Joined: 31 Dec 2009, 00:51
Location: Hampshire, UK

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by IdeFan »

It is very much a mirror of the Aussie race for Mclaren. Jenson makes a risky but ultimately correct tyre call early in the race to hit the front, Lewis makes the wrong call but makes up for it with some absolutely brilliant overtaking and impressive pace. Well impressed by both of them.
"Well we've got this ridiculous situation where we're all sitting by the start-finish line waiting for a winner to come past and we don't seem to be getting one!" - James Hunt, Monaco 1982
eytl
F1 Rejects Founder
Posts: 1197
Joined: 31 Mar 2009, 12:43
Location: Sydney, Australia
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by eytl »

OK that race was chaotic.

Will have to rewatch before writing the review! So many talking points and issues emerging. And, might I say, a tough decision for ROTR coming up ...
User avatar
mario
Posts: 8269
Joined: 31 Oct 2009, 17:13

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by mario »

eytl wrote:OK that race was chaotic.

Will have to rewatch before writing the review! So many talking points and issues emerging. And, might I say, a tough decision for ROTR coming up ...


And given that the stewards are going to be working overtime, I would hold back on the review until they have made their minds up.
Well, that was a bit of a mess at times, and we've had a few drivers getting a little over aggressive at times. I expect that there will be a lot of debate afterwards about who is in the right and in the wrong. Certainly, if things continue as they are with this volcano in Iceland, they won't be going anywhere fast and will have plenty of time to talk this one over.
Martin Brundle, on watching a replay of Grosjean spinning:
"The problem with Grosjean is that he want to take a look back at the corner he's just exited"
Archie2K
Posts: 54
Joined: 22 Sep 2009, 10:30

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by Archie2K »

Right so do we now have a situation where for a certain intensity of rain it is too wet for slicks and too dry for inters?
User avatar
IdeFan
Posts: 535
Joined: 31 Dec 2009, 00:51
Location: Hampshire, UK

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by IdeFan »

Archie2K wrote:Right so do we now have a situation where for a certain intensity of rain it is too wet for slicks and too dry for inters?


I think the answer to that question is "depends how long you've been on the inters". When everyone pitted for inters first time around it was clearly too dry, Nico and Jenson seemed to get on just fine on slicks. Towards the end of the race it was probably too dry for inters, so they wore them out, then right at the death the rain picked up and it was inter weather, but cos theyd worn them out they had no tread left.

So basically on fresh rubber theres always a tyre to suit, worn rubber is a different matter.
"Well we've got this ridiculous situation where we're all sitting by the start-finish line waiting for a winner to come past and we don't seem to be getting one!" - James Hunt, Monaco 1982
User avatar
mediocre
Posts: 261
Joined: 05 Sep 2009, 13:13

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by mediocre »

The best overtaking point on the Chinese circuit seems to be the pit lane entry. :?
User avatar
Salamander
Posts: 9613
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 20:59
Location: Embittered former NASCAR fan.

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by Salamander »

thehemogoblin wrote:
eytl wrote:Looks like it's for debris. What it has done is obliterated Button/Rosberg/Kubica's advantage and brought Schumacher, Hamilton and the Red Bulls right back into it.


F1's been Dale Juniored!


:lol:
Sebastian Vettel wrote:If I was good at losing, I wouldn't be in Formula 1
User avatar
eagleash
Posts: 2222
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 18:22
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by eagleash »

Not only did the Maccas seem intent on keeping Wurz & Co (stewards) busy but their false neutral problem seemed to evaporate. Can't see the advantage in it but.....sandbagging?........curious....
DemocalypseNow wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
Pedestrian
Posts: 156
Joined: 10 Mar 2010, 20:37

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by Pedestrian »

WOW! What A Race!
It had all the ingredients that were supposed to make 2010 an exciting year (except Schumacher winning, but hey: they can't all be winners, can they?). We saw overtaking in the dry and in the rain, overtaking in the pits, different strategies, everything you would want to see in a F1 race. OK, there was the threat of rain right from the start, but the first half of the race was still run on a dry track and it was as exciting as the second half. And Button made a pass for the lead in the dry! When was the last time you saw that happen?

McLaren are the big winners today. They confirmed their potential and are the third team to score a double (although Hamilton could still be penalised) after only 4 races, thus confirming the competitiveness of the 2010 field - and the fact that each team has different strengths and weaknesses.
Button is now leading the championship and is in an increasingly good position to defend his crown. Will we see him dominate in the future, after many years of inconsistent performances? Is he the new Mika Hakkinen, achieving brilliance towards the end of his career? So far, he engourages comparaison to another of his great predecessors: Alain Prost. Once again an inspired strategy worthy of "le proffeseur" has brought him a win against possibly faster competitors.
Lewis Hamilton deserves a win too one of this days. Today, his aggresive driving was rewarded with "only" a second place, but the real winners were the viewers. His chase of Vettel through the field in the beginning of the race was great to watch. Let's hope he keeps driving like this for the rest of the season.
As much as I am a Button fan, it would be probably be better for McLaren as a team if Lewis was ahead, because I suspect that Buton can handle being nr. 2, while Hamilton could become demoralised and his performance would suffer.
Another team that did well today is Renault. Kubica lost a podium, but his final result is still decent, and Petrov finally finished a race - and what a finish that was!A spectacular result from what I expected to be a mediocre pay driver. Renault can certainly use the extra points (they did better than Red Bull today!).
On the subject of Red Bull: Vettel wasted another pole position today. He begins to remind me of Montoya in 2002. Hero in qualy, looser in the race. Maybe the failures are dua to a lack of experience, but I'm starting to understand why people suspect RedBull of doing something "special" in qualyfying. Overall, Red Bull are still close to the leaders, but they are slipping behind.
Meanwhile, Mercedes still don't look like they can challenge for the championship. How should Rosberg feel about today's race? He beat Schumacher and scored a podium again, but he allso missed again the chance to win. I will not comment on Schumacher's performance (or lack thereof) because I'm sure that others will amply do so. I still believe that if Mercedes develop according to their potential they can win a race this season, even with Schumacher in the car, but that day may come very late into the season.
Ferrari seem to be in somewhat of a slump right now. They did not look as fast as at the start of the season. Nonetheless, Fernando Alonso drove a very good (but chaotic) race to finish 4-th. However, he allso seemed a bit too eager to assert his dominance over Massa and his attitude, especially the incident in the pit entry, could poison relationships within the team.
The mediocre teams today were Williams and Torro Rosso. Nothing to see here, neither brilliance nor rejectdom.
Truly rejectfull teams were Sauber and Force india. Sauber suffered another double DNF and wasted a possible chance at points. Force India allso wasted a chance at winning points, and have now lost contact with Renault. Given that this track was supposed to suit them and that Sutil has a certain reputation as a "rain specialist" today's result must be a major dissapointment for them.
As for the new teams, they are still far behind. Even with the intervention of the safety cars, they lagged too far behind to challenge for the points. Clearly a lot of work remains to be done if they want to become competitive.

Next race is in Barcelona: an usually processional race, but one that should answer some quastions about this year's pecking order. Let's hope the rest of the season will be interesting.
User avatar
eagleash
Posts: 2222
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 18:22
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by eagleash »

The whole body language of Schumi/Merc (his) was just jaded & World weary. Remember how he could dominate in the wet & shine in lesser machinery. It is still early days but I am disappointed with his performance so far & tending towards agreeing with those who said it was a comeback too far. When speculation began towards the end of last season I did cite the examples of Nigel & AJ as reasons why Michael should not return, but was still hopeful that we might see something more from him than we have.
DemocalypseNow wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
User avatar
eagleash
Posts: 2222
Joined: 16 Nov 2009, 18:22
Location: London UK
Contact:

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by eagleash »

What would the race have been like without the rain?
DemocalypseNow wrote: when eagleash of all people says you've gone too far about something you just know that's when to apply the brakes and do a U-turn.
Pedestrian
Posts: 156
Joined: 10 Mar 2010, 20:37

Re: 2010 Chinese Grand Prix Discussion

Post by Pedestrian »

eagleash wrote:What would the race have been like without the rain?

That's a good question. But who knows the answer? The first laps were run on a dry track and they were still interesting. Maybe the threat of rain, and the certainty of multiple pit stops, made the drivers take more chances than usual. On an encouraging note, the performance of Vettel, Hamilton and to some extent Alonso on fresh rubber may indicate that there is an advantage after all to changing tires, so we might see more creative pit strategies in future races. We can only hope for the best.
Post Reply