shinji wrote:I wish they came out really often and honestly and candidly explained his condition. It was the same with Henry Surtees - just look through that thread and you can see how the story was pieced together from Twitter and other random sources. With the internet, this is inevitable, so regular updates would be a good move and would stop fans worrying and posting ranting comments like this. I know there are reasons for not doing this, but it's just annoying how he weant from having a 'positive outcome to surgery' to being in a 'life threatening condition' and is now 'satisfactory'.
Well, we don't know how the press conference exactly went. My guess: on one side there is a neurosurgeon, a scientist, trained not to exclude any possibility and evaluate the situation as it evolves. On the other sides sport journalists, who by trade must peddle sensationalism. In this exchange between foreign cultures (and possibly foreign languages) it's very likely that "brain damage can't be excluded" translates into "brain damage is certain". I am not saying that journos are willfully misleading, just that the "languages" of science and sport don't always match.